Add climate havoc to war crimes
Pentagon’s role in global catastrophe
Published Dec 16, 2009 6:17 PM
In evaluating the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen — with
more than 15,000 participants from 192 countries, including more than 100 heads
of state, as well as 100,000 demonstrators in the streets — it is
important to ask: How is it possible that the worst polluter of carbon dioxide
and other toxic emissions on the planet is not a focus of any conference
discussion or proposed restrictions?
By every measure, the Pentagon is the largest institutional user of petroleum
products and energy in general. Yet the Pentagon has a blanket exemption in all
international climate agreements.
The Pentagon wars in Iraq and Afghanistan; its secret operations in Pakistan;
its equipment on more than 1,000 U.S. bases around the world; its 6,000
facilities in the U.S.; all NATO operations; its aircraft carriers, jet
aircraft, weapons testing, training and sales will not be counted against U.S.
greenhouse gas limits or included in any count.
The Feb. 17, 2007, Energy Bulletin detailed the oil consumption just for the
Pentagon’s aircraft, ships, ground vehicles and facilities that made it
the single-largest oil consumer in the world. At the time, the U.S. Navy had
285 combat and support ships and around 4,000 operational aircraft. The U.S.
Army had 28,000 armored vehicles, 140,000 High-Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled
Vehicles, more than 4,000 combat helicopters, several hundred fixed-wing
aircraft and 187,493 fleet vehicles. Except for 80 nuclear submarines and
aircraft carriers, which spread radioactive pollution, all their other vehicles
run on oil.
Even according to rankings in the 2006 CIA World Factbook, only 35 countries
(out of 210 in the world) consume more oil per day than the Pentagon.
The U.S. military officially uses 320,000 barrels of oil a day. However, this
total does not include fuel consumed by contractors or fuel consumed in leased
and privatized facilities. Nor does it include the enormous energy and
resources used to produce and maintain their death-dealing equipment or the
bombs, grenades or missiles they fire.
Steve Kretzmann, director of Oil Change International, reports: “The Iraq
war was responsible for at least 141 million metric tons of carbon dioxide
equivalent (MMTCO2e) from March 2003 through December 2007. ... The war emits
more than 60 percent of all countries. ... This information is not readily
available ... because military emissions abroad are exempt from national
reporting requirements under U.S. law and the U.N. Framework Convention on
Climate Change.” (www.naomiklein.org, Dec. 10) Most scientists blame
carbon dioxide emissions for greenhouse gases and climate change.
Barry Sanders in his new book, “The Green Zone: The Environmental Costs
of Militarism,” says that “the greatest single assault on the
environment, on all of us around the globe, comes from one agency ... the Armed
Forces of the United States.”
Just how did the Pentagon come to be exempt from climate agreements? At the
time of the Kyoto Accords negotiations, the U.S. demanded as a provision of
signing that all of its military operations worldwide and all operations it
participates in with the U.N. and/or NATO be completely exempted from
measurement or reductions.
After securing this gigantic concession, the Bush administration then refused
to sign the accords.
In a May 18, 1998, article entitled “National security and military
policy issues involved in the Kyoto treaty,” Dr. Jeffrey Salmon described
the Pentagon’s position. He quotes then-Secretary of Defense William
Cohen’s 1997 annual report to Congress: “DoD strongly recommends
that the United States insist on a national security provision in the climate
change Protocol now being negotiated.” (www.marshall.org)
According to Salmon, this national security provision was put forth in a draft
calling for “complete military exemption from greenhouse gas emissions
limits. The draft includes multilateral operations such as NATO- and
U.N.-sanctioned activities, but it also includes actions related very broadly
to national security, which would appear to comprehend all forms of unilateral
military actions and training for such actions.”
Salmon also quoted Undersecretary of State Stuart Eizenstat, who headed the
U.S. delegation in Kyoto. Eizenstat reported that “every requirement the
Defense Department and uniformed military who were at Kyoto by my side said
they wanted, they got. This is self-defense, peacekeeping, humanitarian
Although the U.S. had already received these assurances in the negotiations,
the U.S. Congress passed an explicit provision guaranteeing U.S. military
exemption. Inter Press Service reported on May 21, 1998: “U.S. law
makers, in the latest blow to international efforts to halt global warming,
today exempted U.S. military operations from the Kyoto agreement which lays out
binding commitments to reduce ‘greenhouse gas’ emissions. The House
of Representatives passed an amendment to next year’s military
authorization bill that ‘prohibits the restriction of armed forces under
the Kyoto Protocol.’”
Today in Copenhagen the same agreements and guidelines on greenhouse gases
still hold. Yet it is extremely difficult to find even a mention of this
According to environmental journalist Johanna Peace, military activities will
continue to be exempt from an executive order signed by President Barack Obama
that calls for federal agencies to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by
2020. Peace states, “The military accounts for a full 80 percent of the
federal government’s energy demand.” (solveclimate.com, Sept.
The blanket exclusion of the Pentagon’s global operations makes U.S.
carbon dioxide emissions appear far less than they in fact are. Yet even
without counting the Pentagon, the U.S. still has the world’s largest
carbon dioxide emissions.
More than emissions
Besides emitting carbon dioxide, U.S. military operations release other highly
toxic and radioactive materials into the air, water and soil.
U.S. weapons made with depleted uranium have spread tens of thousands of pounds
of microparticles of radioactive and highly toxic waste throughout the Middle
East, Central Asia and the Balkans.
The U.S. sells land mines and cluster bombs that are a major cause of delayed
explosions, maiming and disabling especially peasant farmers and rural peoples
in Africa, Asia and Latin America. For example, Israel dropped more than 1
million U.S.-provided cluster bombs on Lebanon during its 2006 invasion.
The U.S. war in Vietnam left large areas so contaminated with the Agent Orange
herbicide that today, more than 35 years later, dioxin contamination is 300 to
400 times higher than “safe” levels. Severe birth defects and high
rates of cancer resulting from environmental contamination are continuing into
a third generation.
The 1991 U.S. war in Iraq, followed by 13 years of starvation sanctions, the
2003 U.S. invasion and continuing occupation, has transformed the region
— which has a 5,000-year history as a Middle East breadbasket —
into an environmental catastrophe. Iraq’s arable and fertile land has
become a desert wasteland where the slightest wind whips up a dust storm. A
former food exporter, Iraq now imports 80 percent of its food. The Iraqi
Agriculture Ministry estimates that 90 percent of the land has severe
Environmental war at home
Moreover, the Defense Department has routinely resisted orders from the
Environmental Protection Agency to clean up contaminated U.S. bases.
(Washington Post, June 30, 2008) Pentagon military bases top the Superfund list
of the most polluted places, as contaminants seep into drinking water aquifers
The Pentagon has also fought EPA efforts to set new pollution standards on two
toxic chemicals widely found on military sites: perchlorate, found in
propellant for rockets and missiles; and trichloroethylene, a degreaser for
Trichloroethylene is the most widespread water contaminant in the country,
seeping into aquifers across California, New York, Texas, Florida and
elsewhere. More than 1,000 military sites in the U.S. are contaminated with the
chemical. The poorest communities, especially communities of color, are the
most severely impacted by this poisoning.
U.S. testing of nuclear weapons in the U.S. Southwest and on South Pacific
islands has contaminated millions of areas of land and water with radiation.
Mountains of radioactive and toxic uranium tailings have been left on
Indigenous land in the Southwest. More than 1,000 uranium mines have been
abandoned on Navajo reservations in Arizona and New Mexico.
Around the world, on past and still operating bases in Puerto Rico, the
Philippines, South Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Japan, Nicaragua, Panama and
the former Yugoslavia, rusting barrels of chemicals and solvents and millions
of rounds of ammunition are criminally abandoned by the Pentagon.
The best way to dramatically clean up the environment is to shut down the
Pentagon. What is needed to combat climate change is a thoroughgoing system
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: [email protected]
Subscribe [email protected]
Support independent news DONATE