Follow workers.org on
RED HOT: TRAYVON MARTIN
CHINA,
AFGHANISTAN, FIGHTING RACISM, OCCUPY WALL STREET,
PEOPLE'S POWER, SAVE OUR POST OFFICES, WOMEN, AFRICA,
LIBYA, WISCONSIN WORKERS FIGHT BACK, SUPPORT STATE & LOCAL WORKERS,
EGYPT, NORTH AFRICA & MIDDLE EAST,
STOP FBI REPRESSION, RESIST ARIZONA RACISM, NO TO FRACKING, DEFEND PUBLIC EDUCATION, ANTI-WAR,
HEALTH CARE,
CUBA, CLIMATE CHANGE,
JOBS JOBS JOBS,
STOP FORECLOSURES, IRAN,
IRAQ, CAPITALIST CRISIS,
IMMIGRANTS, LGBT, POLITICAL PRISONERS,
KOREA,
HONDURAS, HAITI,
SOCIALISM,
GAZA
|
|
Big business, Pentagon real sponsors of pro-war spin
By
LeiLani Dowell
Published May 4, 2008 8:36 PM
How many times in the past five years have you turned on CNN or another news
network to find some “military analyst”—usually a former
general or military official—giving his opinion on how well the
occupation of Iraq was going, or why the U.S. should continue with the war?
An extensive exposé in the April 20 New York Times has revealed that many
of these “opinions” have been bought by the Bush administration in
an unprecedented and ongoing propaganda campaign.
The article, “Message Machine: Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s
Hidden Hand,” described a network of military analysts that
“represent more than 150 military contractors either as lobbyists, senior
executives, board members or consultants ... all part of a vast assemblage of
contractors scrambling for hundreds of billions by the administration’s
war on terror.”
At the beginning of 2002, the campaign to garner public support for the second
Iraq war was launched, with these analysts at the forefront.
Whenever the Pentagon wanted a particular spin on affairs, or whenever negative
coverage of the “war on terror” appeared in the media, the analysts
would be rushed to briefings and scripted tours—from Guantánamo to
Iraq—where they would be given the Pentagon line.
They then would appear on the news or write op-ed pieces repeating that line.
“Internal Pentagon documents repeatedly refer to the military analysts as
‘message force multipliers’ or ‘surrogates’ who could
be counted on to deliver administration ‘themes and messages’ to
millions of Americans ‘in the form of their own opinions,’”
the Times reports.
In return for espousing favorable sentiments on the air, the analysts—who
were instructed not to publicly discuss their contacts with the
Pentagon—received business advantages from the Bush administration,
including paid trips to Iraq; briefings with military leaders and White House,
State Department and Justice Department officials; and access to classified
materials. Those who failed to put forth the “correct” version of
the war were dropped.
Entire ruling class complicit
The exposé reminds readers of “other administration tactics that
subverted traditional journalism. Federal agencies, for example, have paid
columnists to write favorably about the administration. They have distributed
to local TV stations hundreds of fake news segments with fawning accounts of
administration accomplishments. The Pentagon itself has made covert payments to
Iraqi newspapers to publish coalition propaganda.”
What is becoming clearer through revelations like the Times article is that
it’s not just the Bush administration that is guilty of the war and
occupation of Iraq—it’s the entire ruling class, from the corporate
media to retired generals to the Democrats. All saw the means to make profit
from the war and continued occupation, and therefore all kept their mouths shut
despite any misgivings they may have had. This article only appears now because
many in the ruling class see the situation in Iraq as a complete disaster.
The article is useful in that it provides more evidence of what anti-war forces
and independent media outlets have been saying since before the war began: that
the case for war was built on a bed of lies. Yet the article fails to mention
the anti-war movement at all, once again ignoring it in favor of
“experts”—even in an article exposing those experts as
charlatans.
Less than a week after the Times exposé was published, the corporate media
was awash with what appears to be a buildup for war against
Iran—including increased public allegations that Iran is supporting the
insurgency in Iraq; the firing of warning shots by a U.S. Navy-contracted
vessel at two speedboats several miles off the coast of Iran; and the statement
by Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, that the
Pentagon is planning “potential military courses of action” with
regards to Iran.
Like Iraq, this new buildup has been spoon-fed to the “military
analysts,” according to the Times. In April 2006, when several generals
openly criticized then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, a special meeting
with the analysts was held.
“Even as they assured Mr. Rumsfeld that they stood ready to help in this
public relations offensive,” the Times reports, “the analysts
sought guidance on what they should cite as the next ‘milestone.’
...
“Days later, Mr. Rumsfeld wrote a memorandum distilling their collective
guidance into bullet points. Two were underlined:
“Focus on the Global War on Terror—not simply Iraq. The wider
war—the long war.”
“Link Iraq to Iran. Iran is the concern.”
Email: [email protected]
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: [email protected]
Subscribe [email protected]
Support independent news DONATE
|
|