U.S. torture record queried at UN committee
Published May 16, 2006 10:32 PM
Judging by responses to U.S. testimony at the
International Committee Against Torture, Washington is on the defensive. Abu
Ghraib and the other hellholes the United States runs in Iraq, Baghram Air force
base in Afghanistan, Guantanamo in Cuba, thousands of “renditions”
along with CIA operatives grabbing non-U.S. citizens off streets and beaches to
be tortured thousands of miles away, the callous disregard toward the people of
color who were victims of Hurricane Katrina—all this has exposed to the
world U.S. imperialism’s cruel, vicious depravity.
propaganda machine that uses racism and bigotry dressed up in slick production
values, Washington has tried to sell itself as holding the moral high ground.
But to the extent anyone ever believed this claim, it was based on
Now Washington, afraid of losing a significant part of its
worldwide political influence, is trying to regain this aura. That appears to be
the State Department’s calculation. On May 5 the State Department sent a
large, high-level delegation, headed by legal adviser John B. Bellinger III, to
Geneva, Switzerland, for the International Committee Against Torture.
This committee is part of the United Nations. It was set up by the 1987
Convention Against Torture, a treaty that the United States signed. Under this
convention, the United States had been expected to report on its detention
policies by 1999.
The Geneva meeting was the first time the United States
has responded in an international forum to any charges about its
“detention policies” since Sept. 11, 2001. The delegation’s
report stuck to the same tired denials that the U.S. government has
systematically mistreated prisoners.
“The timing of our report comes
at a difficult time for the United States,” said Bellinger, who is one of
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s main advisors. “But we did not
shy away from coming.”
Even the European members of the commission
had trouble swallowing Washington’s dissembling responses. Fernando Marino
Menendez of Spain, relying on reports from Amnesty International, raised the
issue that only 10 U.S. service members or intelligence officers out of 600
accused of the torture or murder of detainees have received prison terms of a
year or more.
Andreas Mavrommatis, UN ambassador from Cyprus and chair of
the committee, was skeptical about Bellinger’s claim that the United
States got diplomatic assurances that the suspects it turned over in its
renditions would not be tortured. He said, “The very fact that you are
asking for diplomatic assurances means you are in doubt.”
European governments are mainly worried about violations of their sovereignty.
Issues like secret CIA overflights, secret CIA prison camps, kidnapping of their
citizens, and the need to keep their political distance from the debacle of Iraq
appear to drive them. This came out clearly on the second day of questioning
over the report. A committee of the European Union’s parliament is
currently in the United States to investigate these charges.
Camara, a committee member and jurist from Senegal, challenged the United States
directly. He said that the UN and its committee are the responsible bodies that
will create the definition of torture. The United States wants to gut the
definition by insisting on the phrases “excessive force or violence”
and “significant injury or degradation.” Camara told the U.S.
delegation: “One of the parties is going to have to give way. And I think
it’s probably going to have to be you.”
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: [email protected]
Subscribe [email protected]
Support independent news DONATE