The health of Fidel and Cuba
By
Teresa Gutierrez
Published Aug 14, 2006 9:44 PM
An aide to the president of Cuba addres sed
the Cuban people on national television July 31 to announce that President Fidel
Castro had temporarily relinquished his government responsibilities.
Due
to a severe intestinal problem that led to bleeding, Cuba’s president had
to undergo surgery. According to President Fidel Castro’s statement, the
surgery came on the heels of intense work and several trips—including one
to Argentina—which brought on great stress.
For the first time since
the triumph of the Revolution in 1959, Fidel—as he is affectionately
referred to in Cuba and around the world—had to hand over his
responsibilities to the first vice president of the country, Raúl Castro.
This is in accordance with Cuba’s constitution.
All reports indicate
that President Fidel is doing well. But he must take the time to rest and heal
in order to carry out his work.
Fidel turns 80 on Aug. 13. The birthday
celebrations planned by the Ecuadorian solidarity movement were rescheduled for
Dec. 2, marking the 50th anniversary of the historic landing of the Granma ship
in Cuba, which launched Fidel’s guerrilla war against the U.S.-backed
Batista regime.
As soon as the news of Fidel’s illness was made
public, the Bush administration issued hostile and dangerous statements in yet
another example of U.S. imperialism’s long-standing desire to overturn the
Cuban Revolution. It is this desire matched with persistent deeds that lead to
the danger for the Revolution from imperialism. This danger is not rhetoric or
fantasy.
U.S. presidents get boos, Fidel gets cheers
When
revolutionaries and Cuba supporters around the world heard that President Fidel
had taken ill, they were immediately concerned and anxious. This is a leader who
is loved and respected not only in his country, but in every nation on the
globe.
Fidel is the only leader who can get a standing ovation anywhere.
So it is no surprise that messages of support and wishes to get well were
sent to Fidel from around the world. Those sending messages included Gabriel
García Márquez; Bolivian President Evo Morales; the Revolutionary
Armed Forces of Colombia; General Secretary Hu Jintao of the Chinese Communist
Party; Vene zue lan President Hugo Chávez; and Brazil’s President
Lula da Silva, as well as countless activists and leaders.
Of special
note were messages from the Cuban Five—Cuban political prisoners held in
the U.S. for trying to defend their island country by monitoring CIA-backed
right-wing terrorists in Miami.
From the U.S. government, there is quite
another tone. The health issue of Cuba’s president is being used as a
pretext for turning up an anti-Cuba tirade that is very dangerous. Indeed,
Cuba’s leaders have warned that Fidel’s health is a major security
issue for the island.
Imperialism can easily use the current situation as
a pretext for intervention.
For example, in clear violation of
Cuba’s sovereignty, White House spokesperson Tony Snow on Aug. 1, just one
day after Cuba’s announcement, stated: “The one thing that
[President George W. Bush] has talked about from the very beginning is his hope
for the Cuban people finally to enjoy the fruits of freedom and democracy. For
the dictator, Fidel Castro, to hand off power to his brother, who’s been
the prison keeper, is not a change in that status. Raúl Castro’s
attempt to impose himself on the Cuban people is much the same as what his
brother did. So, no, there are no plans to reach out. The one thing we want to
do is to continue to assure the people of Cuba that we stand ready to
help.”
The actions of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice ratcheted
up the danger of U.S. intervention even more. According to news accounts, the
secretary of state warned Cuba that Fidel must not be replaced by “a new
dictator.” Rice urged Cubans to “stay on the island amid the
political turmoil.”
She said on Meet the Press, which aired on Aug.
6: “This is a transition period for the Cuban people. We are going to
stand with them for the proposition that there should not simply be the end of
one dictatorship and the imposition of another dictatorship.
“The
United States really feels very strongly and we’ve worked to tell the
Cuban people that their future is at home. And, no, a mass exodus is not to be
expected, nor would it be condoned,” Rice said. “What the United
States has been giving is a message to the Cuban people that change is clearly
underway. The United States stands clearly with people who want a more
democratic future.”
Earlier, on Aug. 4, Rice—via U.S.-funded
Radio Marti and TV Marti—called on “the world community” to
press for “multi-party elections amid uncertainty over Castro’s
fate.” She told Cubans, “We will stand with you to secure your
rights—to speak as you choose, to think as you please, to worship as you
wish and to choose your leaders, freely and fairly, in democratic
elections.”
The Miami Herald of Aug. 7 reported that broadcasts to
Cuba through TV Marti and Radio Marti have increased to six times a week. Radio
Marti began in 1985 and TV Marti in 1990 in violation of Cuba’s
sovereignty and international law. Radio Marti and TV Marti are tools used by
the right wing in this country to spew anti-Fidel and counter-revolutionary
messages.
The climate of hostility emanating from Washington has the
solidarity movement on alert. In the last few days an international letter
titled, “The sovereignty of Cuba must be respected,” has circulated
around the world. It has been signed by such notables as José Saramago,
Adolfo Pérez Esquivel, Desmond Tutu, Rigoberta Menchú, Nadine
Gordimer, Noam Chom sky, Harry Belafonte, Mario Benedetti, Ignacio Ramonet,
Danny Glover, Eduardo Galeano, Russell Banks, Alice Walker and Ramsey Clark.
The statement reads in part: “As a result of the communication of
Fidel Castro on his state of health and the provisional delegation of his
responsibilities, high-ranking U.S officials have formulated more explicit
statements about the immediate future of Cuba. The Secretary of Com merce Carlos
Gutierrez said that ‘the moment has arrived for a true transition towards
a true democracy … .’
“Already the ‘Commission
for Assis tance to a free Cuba,’ presided over by the Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice, pointed out in a report issued[in] June ‘the urgency of
working today to ensure that the Castro regime’s succession strategy does
not succeed’ and President Bush indicated that this document
‘demonstrates that we are actively working for change in Cuba, not simply
waiting for change.’”
The statement concludes: “The
Department of State has emphasized that the plan includes measures that will
remain secret ‘for reasons of national security’ and to assure its
‘effective implementation.’ It is not difficult to imagine the
character of such measures and the ‘announced assistance’ if one
considers the militarization of the foreign policy of the present American
administration and its performance in Iraq.
“In front of this
increasing threat against the integrity of a nation, and the peace and the
security of Latin America and the world, we the signatories listed below demand
that the government of the United States respect the sovereignty of Cuba. We
must prevent a new aggression at all costs.”
To sign on to this
statement, visit www.porcuba.org or email [email protected].
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
[email protected]
Subscribe
[email protected]
Support independent news
DONATE