As rich get Katrina funds
Survivors who are poor suffer health crisis
By
LeiLani Dowell
Published Apr 27, 2006 7:56 AM
As news about the fate of survivors of
hurricanes Katrina and Rita fades from the headlines, the aftermath and
continuing effects of what many call “hurricane America” continue
for them. That hurricane persists in providing safety and security for the
wealthy few while ignoring the needs of the poorest sections of the working
class.
A study released April 18 by the Mailman School of Public Health at
Columbia University and the Children’s Health Fund describes a
“second crisis” found in FEMA’s temporary housing in
Louisiana—an alarming epidemic of chronic medical conditions and mental
health disorders, compounded by a lack of treatment and prescription medicine.
(The complete study findings can be accessed at
www.ncdp.mailman.columbia.)
According to a press release, the study found
that:
* More than one-third of children have at least one diagnosed
chronic medical condition and are more likely to suffer from asthma, behavioral
or conduct problems, developmental delay or physical impairment, and learning
disabilities.
* Nearly half the parents surveyed reported that at least
one of their children had emotional or behavioral difficulties not observed
before the hurricane.
* More than half the women caregivers showed
evidence of clinically diagnosed psychiatric problems, such as depression or
anxiety disorders.
* On average, households have moved 3.5 times since the
hurricane, some as many as nine times, often across state lines.
* More
than one-fifth of the school-age children who were displaced were either not in
school or had missed 10 or more days of school in the past month.
The
authors of the report stress that failure to address the physical and mental
health needs of survivors will have long-term consequences. Yet Anthony Speier,
Louisiana’s director of disaster mental health, says that although 500
crisis counselors are being paid for by the federal government, the money
allocated for them cannot be used to treat mental or behavioral disorders. (New
York Times, April 18)
Who gets redevelopment
money?
Meanwhile, in New Orleans, “Just as disparities between
rich and poor were exposed in the days after Hurricane Katrina, class and wealth
seem to be playing a significant role [in redevelopment].... While [the wealthy,
gated community of] Eastover is full of the sounds of saws ripping wood and the
pneumatic punch of nail guns, the sound of the Lower Ninth Ward is mainly
silence.” (New York Times, April 25)
On its face value, the
redevelopment plan being used in New Orleans calls for community
control—residents get to decide as a group what their vision is for the
rebuilding of their neighborhoods. However, funds and resources to enlist the
help of planners, architects and other experts are not attached to this
plan.
In addition, the plan requires residents to determine how many of
those displaced will be returning to the neighborhood—an estimate that the
city will use to decide whether areas will be rebuilt and provided city
services, turned into swampland, or sold to the highest-bidding
developer.
This redevelopment plan was first proposed by the
euphemistically titled “Bring New Orleans Back Commission,” with
real estate executive—and George Bush fundraiser—Joseph Canizaro at
the helm.
Unlike wealthier home-owning areas, only one small enclave in
the Lower Ninth Ward, the Holy Cross neighborhood, had a homeowners’
association, according to the Times. In the wealthier areas these associations
have been useful in tracking down residents and contracting professional
planners to devise blueprints for rebuilding.
The largely African-American
Lower Ninth Ward has the largest number of residents currently displaced
throughout the country. They are being denied the ability to participate in the
planning process due to lack of means to travel to the area. At the same time,
gas and potable water have not been reestablished in the area, and FEMA has
cited this as the reason for still not delivering residential trailers
there.
Pork-barrel emergency funding
With the need for
resources clearly still a critical issue for many hurricane survivors, criticism
has fallen on the emergency “supplemental” spending bill the Senate
will consider in early May, with a price tag of $106 billion. Even though the
continuing occupations of Iraq and Afghan istan were never an
“emergency” and the Depart ment of Defense budget for 2006 is
already $419.3 billion, the largest portion of the bill would spend an
additional $72 billion for military operations in those
countries.
However, the main criticism of the bill is in response to other
allocations, such as $4 billion for the already well-subsidized farming industry
and $1.1 billion for fishery projects, including $15 million for a
“seafood promotion strategy.”
When funding for all the other
projects in the bill is shaved away, the amount left for hurricane recovery
efforts is $27 billion—a measly amount compared to the magnitude of the
task.
Louisiana officials point out that the cost of rebuilding the levees
alone—a crucial task with the hurricane season now weeks away—will
cost upwards of $6 billion. The Senate bill would add only $600 million to the
$1.5 billion approved by the House for Gulf Coast levees and flood control
projects. To date, the Bush administration has not come up with a formal plan to
rebuild the levees.
Recent audits show that up to $1 billion was wasted by
FEMA in the immediate aftermath of the storms, when it bought trailers and
rented whole cruise ships to provide temporary housing that was impractical and
unwanted. (Washington Post, April 14) While cruise lines and trailer companies
profited, many hurricane survivors wound up in expensive but inadequate hotel
rooms while the government’s Section 8 housing program that provides
subsidies for apartment rentals went unused.
Democrats play politics
on the backs of survivors
Yet the opportunism of the two
major political parties knows no bounds. Just as the Republican party held its
2004 election-year national convention in New York in order to capitalize on
sentiment surrounding the 9/11 attacks, now the Democrats are considering
holding their national convention in New Orleans in 2008.
The Democratic
National Committee held its spring meeting in New Orleans from April 20 to 22.
The Democrats’ response to a city with one of the highest poverty rates in
the U.S. before the hurricane struck, which was deprived of the funds to
maintain critical levees, leading to the ensuing devastation, has been as
sluggish and neglectful as the Republican response. Their main concern is to use
the ongoing Gulf Coast tragedy to push for the presidential win in
2008.
While it is very possible that many voters across the country will
desert the Republicans because of the administration’s lack of response to
the hurricane, and their own disdain for the Iraq war, a growing number of
working and poor people are coming to realize that the true solution to the
crisis of imperialism at home and abroad lies in the organization of the people
to end capitalism once and for all.
[email protected]
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
[email protected]
Subscribe
[email protected]
Support independent news
DONATE