U.S. loses elite troops in Afghanistan
By
G. Dunkel
Published Jul 7, 2005 12:56 AM
So many people in Afghanistan and Iraq are
confronting and challenging the U.S. presence and behavior there that even the
puppets and traitors installed by the United States have had to separate
themselves from the occupiers.
Four Navy Seals on a deep-penetration
mission in the mountains of eastern Afghanistan were uncovered and attacked by
their targets June 28. The U.S. command there sent a team of 16 Special
Forces— eight Army Rangers and eight Navy Seals—to fly to their
rescue in a Chinook helicopter. The guerrillas brought down the copter with a
rocket-propelled grenade, according to the Pentagon.
All 16 members of the
rescue mission died. One of the four original Seals was picked up five days
later and flown to Germany for debriefing. The U.S. is currently combing the
area for the other three and their Afghani “guides.”
This
incident cost the U.S. armed forces the most casualties in one battle suffered
to date since they invaded Afghanistan, plus they lost 16 highly trained special
forces operatives.
The battle was also a lesson in the asymmetric war
between the heavily armed Pentagon forces and the Afghans. A rocket-propelled
grenade sells for about $200 on the illegal market. The cost of a Chinook runs
into the multi-millions, depending on equipment. The training of 16 special
force members, some of whom were officers, also runs into the
millions.
The BBC reported July 2 that 25 Afghan villagers died in two
U.S. air strikes against their homes. Some were killed as they were trying to
help the victims of the first strike.
The past three months have seen some
sharp fighting in Afghanistan, as opponents of the U.S. occupation step up their
struggle. (The Independent, July 3) The casualties have been high: 495 suspected
resisters, 49 Afghan police and soldiers, 134 civilians, and 45 U.S.
troops.
Living conditions have deteriorated along with the fighting. Most
people don’t have electricity, so they use kerosene lanterns. But the
kerosene now on the market in Afghanistan has “leaked” from U.S.
military supplies to fuel helicopters and jets. It is much more volatile than
the kerosene the Afghans generally use.
Hundreds of Afghans have been
horribly burned in the fires and explosions this volatile kerosene causes. They
are dying in hospitals that don’t have the supplies to treat either their
extreme pain or the infections to which their huge, open sores make them
vulnerable.
Cholera struck Kabul June 15 because none of the $4 billion
the U.S. has spent in Afghanistan in the last three years went to providing
clean water. Kabul is the capital, with an international press corps; what is
happening outside the capital is indisputably worse.
Even Afghan President
Hamid Karzai, put in power by the United States and protected by U.S.
bodyguards, is criticizing the behavior of U.S. troops and requesting that they
coordinate more closely with Afghan authorities. (New York Times, June 30)
Earlier in May, when he was visiting Washington, Karzai asked President George
W. Bush for custody over Afghan detainees. Many Afghans are reportedly losing
confidence in the ability of the United States to defeat the
resistance.
Iraq also lacks water
Baghdad’s mayor, Alaa
Mahmoud al-Timimi, threatened to quit July 1 unless the government provides more
money to repair the infrastructure of the city. He asked for $1.5 billion for
2005. So far he has received only $85 million.
The day after he threatened
to quit, a mortar attack on a power station north of Baghdad set off a fire.
This plant supplies the electricity to plants supplying water to northern and
western parts of the city.
The 6.5 million residents of Baghdad already
face sporadic electricity and water outages, erratic fuel supplies, traffic
congested by road blocks, exclusion zones, car bombings and lack of public
services to collect garbage and repair the roads.
Summer in Baghdad brings
temperatures that range from a low of 120º F to a high of 145º F. To
be without water to drink and wash, to lack electricity to run fans, even to
cook is life threatening. The dust storms that hit Baghdad force people to close
their windows, making fans to move the air even more important.
Part of
the reason Baghdad lacks money for basic services is that most of the money
available is being spent on the Green Zone, where the U.S. ambassador lives and
works and where the quisling government meets. To heavily secure the Green Zone,
construction companies use most of the available building materials, equipment
and workers, leaving little for the rest of the city.
Unemployment is
high, somewhere between 50 and 70 percent. This inability to find work drives
many young men to line up for jobs with the police or the army, something
unpopular with most Iraqis. It risks death, and there are at least two car
bombings or suicide attacks a day, the puppet forces often being the
targets.
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld is proclaiming that U.S.
participation in Iraq could last until 2009 or longer. Vice President Dick
Cheney says the U.S. must stay the course. This was basically the message Bush
delivered to a silent audience of troops at Fort Bragg, N.C.
These U.S.
government figures are all putting pressure on the Iraqi government to train
more cops and soldiers so U.S. soldiers can be made available for other military
threats or adventures.
But the U.S. authorities have a big problem in
their training mission. The resistance fighters have thoroughly infiltrated the
Iraqi government. Who then is really benefiting from the U.S. training and the
weapons? Those willing to serve U.S. ends, or resistance forces?
Two
prominent Iraqi politicians have recently challenged the U.S. occupation. Former
electricity minister Ayham al-Samarrai announced the creation of the National
Council for Unity and Con struction of Iraq June 29, which includes significant
Iraqi political and tribal leaders. Al-Samarrai called for recognition of the
right of Iraqis to resist the occupation forces, an end of U.S. military
offensives in Iraqi cities, and negotiation between the resistance and the Iraqi
government.
Al-Samarrai said he represented a group of Iraqi fighters who
want U.S. troops out in one to three years.
His exact political program
and how many fighters he represents are unclear. But it is still important that
an ex-government minister now feels that the government is so weak he can
challenge it.
The BBC carried another story about Samir Sumaidaie,
currently Iraq’s ambassador to the United Nations, who is demanding an
inquiry into the “cold-blooded murder” of a young, unarmed relative
by U.S. Marines. Sumaidaie’s cousin was actually helping the Marines
search his hometown in “restive” Anbar province. When a dispute
broke out, the Marines reportedly shot and killed him.
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
[email protected]
Subscribe
[email protected]
Support independent news
DONATE