Babykillers in Black and Blue
Published Jul 29, 2005 7:21 PM
July 17—In recent days, the armed
standoff in Los Angeles, Calif., gripped the heart, especially when it was
learned that one of the two slain in the hail of police bullets was an adorable
toddler, 19-month-old Suzie Peña.
Within hours of the deaths,
police rushed to the mike to proclaim the murderer of the child was her dead
father, Jose Raul Lemos, who traded gunfire with cops as he held his baby in his
arms.
When a coroner’s report uncovered the fact that the baby was
slain by police fire, the story became, “He made us do
it.”
A man driven to the very precipice of madness, made cops
fire over 90 shots, with semi-automatic weapons, killing himself and his
child.
I thought of the recent incident in northern California, when
police, acting on a erroneous tip, fired at a motorist, who, it turned out, was
unarmed, and (thankfully!) only wounded and not killed by the storm of
bullets.
Invariably, after incidents like these, police mouthpieces are
trotted out to report that the officers involved followed departmental policy.
“Don’t worry,” they seem to be saying, “no policy
was violated when we shot over 100 bullets into this ghetto
neighborhood.”
I wondered, what’s
“policy”?
Policy is what the department says it’s okay
for them to do.
They set policy for themselves!
Remember when the
little Black girl in grade school was handcuffed by cops?
Policy. Nothing
personal ... just policy.
In L.A., Police Chief William Bratton bum-rushes
the mike, to take a few digs at the dead. “He used drugs,” Bratton
assured us. “He was a bad guy.” And one wonders, from whence comes
Bratton’s expertise, other than the abysmal record left in New York City,
like the deadly police strangulation of Anthony Baez; or the doorpost slaughter
of Amadou Diallo, shot [at—WW] 41 times by Bratton’s
minions—and then it dawns, this is indeed expertise, of a
sort.
(Perhaps New York can teach L.A. a thing or two!)
Abner
Louima ... Patrick Dorismund.... yeah, these guys are experts.
The late
Black revolutionary, Malcolm X, didn’t bite his tongue when he
said:
“If we’re going to talk about police
brutality,
it’s because police brutality exists. Why does it exist? Because our
people in this particular society live in a police state.” (Quoted in Jill
Nelson’s “Police Brutality: An Anthology,” N.Y.: Norton, 2000,
p. 206.)
We are looking at cowboys. Wild racing, gun toting, choking
(remember [former LAPD Chief] Daryl Gates’ reference to how choke holds
didn’t kill “normal” people?), bombing, and a hundred shots,
in a residential neighborhood, at an innocent motorist, on a false stolen-car
report.
Cowboys just being cowboys. Policy.
This very weekend, a
man took to the roof of his estranged wife’s suburban Pittsburgh home,
armed with a small-caliber pistol. He rolled around on the roof, and appeared to
be under the influence of something powerful, repeatedly pointing his pistol
firmly against his temple.
This went on for about four hours, and not a
shot was fired before the husband calmed down, and came down.
Oh,
yeah—I almost forgot—this was a white guy.
Activist-writer
Kristian Williams, in the book, “Our Enemies in Blue: Police and Power in
America” (Brooklyn: Soft Skull Press, 2003), reminds us that today’s
police had their genesis in the monstrous brutality and violence of American
slavery. What were once called “searchers,” then “alarm
men,” then “slave patrols,” and then
“paddyrollers” by Black captives, in time became
“police.”
Those days have bled into these, and with it,
violent hatred by the lie, “Serve & Protect.”
One thing
for sure, it ain’t “serve” or “protect” us.
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
[email protected]
Subscribe
[email protected]
Support independent news
DONATE