U.S. imperialism’s role
Yemen teeters on brink of civil war
By
G. Dunkel
Published Jun 4, 2011 10:42 PM
Hundreds of thousands of people, predominantly youth, took to the streets
throughout Yemen on May 28 to demand President Ali Abdullah Saleh leave.
Earlier, there had been heavy fighting between government forces and tribally
based militias, joined by dissident factions of the army. (Miami Herald, May
28)
In February, after the victories of protests in Tunisia and Egypt, protesters
took over the plaza in front of the university in Sana. In conjunction with a
very broad and legal opposition coalition called the Joint Meeting Parties,
these protesters are demanding an end to the corruption that has enriched
regime insiders. They condemn the bad schools, hospitals and roads as well as
the skyrocketing price of food and of clean water. They demand jobs, especially
for college and high-school graduates. (Middle East Review, May 3)
The JMP includes socialists, especially from the al-Hakar movement based in
southern Yemen; Sunni Islamists and other conservatives affiliated with the
party known as Islah; and partisans of Nasserist, Baathist and liberal
platforms. Islah has both very socially conservative members, including some
deemed “terrorist” by the U.S. State Department, and moderates such
as Tawakkul Karman, who is the founder of the nongovernmental organization
Women Journalists Without Chains.
However, the U.S. State Department and some of the big business media have made
a lot of noise about al Qaida, calling it the main “security” issue
in Yemen.
This area contains the world’s biggest source of oil. More than 3 million
barrels of oil a day flow past Yemen’s port of Aden. (Reuters, May 28)
Yet Yemen is a desperately poor country; 40 percent of its 23.5 million people
live on less than $2 a day. It is also the country with the largest population
on the Arabian Peninsula.
On Jan. 11, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton made a brief visit
to Yemen where she held a “town hall” meeting. Clinton “was
asked by a member of the Yemeni Parliament who leads an anticorruption
committee how the United States could tolerate Mr. Saleh’s strongman
rule, given that it had helped to make Yemen a haven for terrorist
groups.”
Clinton replied: “We support an inclusive government. We see that Yemen
is going through a transition. And you’re right: it could go one way or
the other. It could go the right way or the wrong way.” (New York Times,
Jan. 11)
Though Saleh has been an inconsistent ally, sometimes giving the OK for drone
attacks, sometimes rebuffing U.S. requests, the U.S. has consistently given his
government significant amounts of aid. It has refrained from public criticism
of the killing of some 300 unarmed protesters and the wounding of thousands
more since protests began in February.
U.S. pressures Saleh to step down
The U.S. tone has changed recently. After many failed mediation attempts,
mainly from the Gulf Cooperation Council, to arrive at an agreement for Saleh
to leave power, Obama released a statement May 25 calling on Saleh to
“move immediately” to transfer power. (AFP)
Saleh still clings to power. However, the forces of Sadiq al-Ahmar, the head of
Yemen’s largest tribe, the Hashid, successfully fought off a government
attack on his headquarters in Sana that began May 23. They seized some
government offices and forced a ceasefire by May 27.
Saleh survived the defection in March of Gen. Ali Muhsin, who ordered troops
under his command to protect demonstrators in Sana under attack by the
president’s guard. (MER, May 3) Muhsin was the military commander who ran
campaigns against Houthi insurgents in northern Yemen and southerners in the
civil war of 1993-94.
According to the French Press Agency, 15 unarmed protesters were killed and 120
were wounded after a protest at Freedom Square in Taiz on May 29. Thousands of
protesters have been camping in the square since January demanding
Saleh’s departure. A Reuters video of the protest showed a group of women
in burqas chanting against Saleh.
A number of press reports establish that a group of Islamic holy warriors have
seized Zinjibar to “liberate” it from “the agents of the
Americans.” In a statement to the May 30 Yemen Post, the JMP claimed the
Saleh government was behind the militants. “[Saleh] uses these tactics to
show the international community what risks Yemen would pass through if he
leaves office.”
Gen. Abdullah Ali Aleiwa, a former defense minister who no longer supports
Saleh, released a plea to Yemeni soldiers: “We call on you not to follow
orders to confront other army units or the people.” (Reuters, May 30)
The situation in Yemen is extremely fluid, with four main blocs competing: the
Saleh government, dissident forces in the army under Gen. Ali Muhsin, tribal
militias commanded by Sadiq al-Ahmar, and the JMP. The last coalition is united
around Saleh’s departure, a fairer political system and a more equitable
economy. The United States and Saudi Arabia do not want to see an outcome in
which progressives and socialists play a major role.
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
[email protected]
Subscribe
[email protected]
Support independent news
DONATE