ALERT: U.S. war provocation against Iran
By
Sara Flounders
Published Jan 9, 2008 9:25 PM
What is an armada of U.S. warships doing off the coast of Iran?
The Pentagon has initiated an extremely dangerous war provocation just off
Iran’s coast, in the Strait of Hormuz.
The U.S. Navy has gathered nuclear-armed aircraft carriers, guided-missile
destroyers, frigates, cruisers and submarines thousands of miles from the
U.S. off the coast of Iran.
Isn’t this massive mobilization of deadly, nuclear-armed equipment a
major provocation?
On Jan. 6, the U.S. claims a “confrontation” took place between
three massive guided-missile U.S. attack vessels and five small, open Iranian
speedboats at the entrance to the Persian Gulf. Iranian media on Jan. 9 denied
the U.S. claims, saying Washington fabricated a video showing the skirmish.
At its narrowest point, the Strait of Hormuz is only 34 miles across. However,
there is only a 2-mile-wide navigable channel for inbound and outbound tanker
traffic, as well as a 2-mile-wide buffer zone. Roughly 40 percent of all
globally traded oil supply flows on ships through this narrow chokepoint of
water between the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea.
It is essential to take note of when this dangerous “incident” took
place. It was on the eve of President George W. Bush’s trip to the
region. Bush is expected to spend eight days visiting Kuwait, Bahrain, Abu
Dhabi, Dubai and Saudi Arabia. The purpose of his trip is to convince these
corrupt, feudal regimes, which are dependent U.S.-client states, that Iran
represents a dangerous threat.
Isn’t this threatening trip to the countries surrounding Iran a
provocative act?
While the Iranian government has attempted to downplay the incident, Washington
has gone out of its way to further threaten Iran. The corporate media has, with
one voice, uncritically reported the U.S. charges that what happened was an
Iranian “provocation.”
President Bush claimed Iran committed “a provocative act and a dangerous
situation.” Vice Adm. Kevin Cosgriff attacked Iran as
“unnecessarily provocative.” Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
described the move as “provocative and dangerous.” Bryan Whitman, a
Pentagon spokesperson, charged the Iranians with acting in a “reckless
and dangerous manner.”
U.S. warships a constant threat
None of the corporate media has even once asked what this deadly array of U.S.
warships is doing in this narrow chokehold of vital shipping off the coast of
Iran.
The U.S. Navy has again and again held major war games to plan for and stage
just such a confrontation with Iran. The Pentagon has announced that it has
already set targets on thousands of sites in Iran.
A video released to the media belies the very story that is being drummed up by
the Bush administration. It shows five small open-air Iranian speedboats
buzzing in the distance, far from the USS Hopper. Iranian boats have every
right to patrol and defend their own coastal waters.
It should be noted that, according to the Pentagon’s own description, the
USS Hopper is a guided-missile destroyer. It carries an M240 machine gun that
can fire 10 armor-piercing projectiles per second and is capable of carrying
nuclear missiles that can destroy whole cities. This high-tech ship weighs
8,373 tons and measures 504 feet in length. It was traveling in convoy with the
USS Port Royal—a guided-missile cruiser that weighs 9,600 tons fully
loaded and has a length of 567 feet and is also capable of firing Tomahawk
cruise missiles—and the guided-missile frigate USS Ingraham, weighing
4,100 tons and measuring 445 feet in length.
These three deadly ships are just a small part of the U.S. Navy armada arrayed
off the Iranian coast, which includes aircraft carriers that can carry out
prolonged bombing missions. In addition, heavy armor and military supplies for
the U.S. occupation in Iraq and other Gulf countries pass through the channel
aboard U.S. Navy-owned, U.S.-flagged and foreign-flagged ships.
The Bush administration has continued to threaten Iran even since 16 of the top
U.S. spy agencies publicly released a National Intelligence Estimate concluding
that Iran has no nuclear program, at least since 2003, nor nuclear weapons.
This NIE Report was a public rift within the top levels of the U.S. military
and the ruling class, who are concerned that the Bush/Cheney push for a wider
war involving Iran would boomerang.
The attempt by the administration to suppress the NIE Report and the fact that
it was publicly released are signs of just how overstretched the Pentagon is as
it faces massive popular resistance in both Iraq and Afghanistan.
But Bush, speaking to the press after the release of the NIE report, could only
say, “Iran was dangerous, Iran is dangerous, and Iran will continue to be
dangerous.” Bush’s trip to the region is seen as another attempt to
ratchet up a confrontation with Iran. Just before departing, Bush’s
repetitive message was: “Iran was a threat, Iran is a threat, and Iran
will continue to be a threat.”
Gulf of Tonkin ‘incident’ in 1964
It is important to remember that the massive U.S. bombing of Vietnam and the
Johnson administration’s escalation of the war was preceded by reports of
an attack on a U.S. destroyer in the Gulf of Tonkin off the coast of
Vietnam—which years later was finally admitted to be phony.
On Aug. 2 and 4, 1964, the Pentagon claimed that small Vietnamese boats had
fired on the USS Maddox and another destroyer in the Gulf of Tonkin. Lyndon
Johnson used this “attack” as pretext for ramming a resolution
through Congress giving him the power and funds to wage war on Vietnam.
Johnson’s own papers later revealed it was a fraud, and then Defense
Secretary Robert McNamara admitted in the film “Fog of War” that
the whole incident had been phony.
The U.S. military has prepared a plan to attack more than 10,000 possible
targets inside Iran, which could destroy the country’s entire
infrastructure.
Nearly all the Republicans and Democrats in both houses of Congress, including
the present major contenders for the presidential nomination, voted for
resolutions against Iran. In a staged or fraudulent confrontation with Iran,
with wild charges from the corporate-owned media, Congressional opposition is
highly unlikely.
It is vital that the anti-war movement be on full alert regarding the danger of
wider war with Iran. It could well start, as it did in Vietnam, with a staged
“provocation.”
As in both Vietnam and in Iraq today, once the Pentagon initiates a war of
colonial conquest it can drag on for many years at a cost of millions of lives
and untold destruction. But in the long run the popular determination to resist
occupation is more powerful than the Pentagon’s deadliest weapons.
Flounders is coordinator of the Stop the War on Iran Campaign, a project of the International Action Center.
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
[email protected]
Subscribe
[email protected]
Support independent news
DONATE