U.S. imperialism exposed as
British House of Lords deny Chagos Islanders right of return
By
Abayomi Azikiwe
Published Nov 2, 2008 9:19 PM
A decision by the British House of Lords, the upper house of Parliament, has
overturned a previous high court ruling to allow the inhabitants of the Chagos
Islands to return to their homes. The Chagos Islands, the largest of which was
known as Diego Garcia, are located in the Indian Ocean archipelago.
Thousands of Chagos Islanders, also known as Ilois, are living in Britain after
being evacuated during the 1960s and early 1970s, when the territory was leased
by the British to the United States for the construction of a naval and air
base.
In a British court decision in November of 2000, the people of the Chagos
Islands won their case, which claimed that their forced removal was illegal.
The then British foreign secretary, Robin Cook, claimed that the government
would immediately transport the Chagossians to the outer islands.
However, in 2004 the government decided to renege on the decision and appealed
the initial verdict in favor of the Chagos Islanders. In a high court decision
in 2007, the original verdict was upheld and it was reiterated that the people
were illegally expelled and should be given the right to repatriate.
Nonetheless, the British appealed to the House of Lords, which delivered the
most recent decision denying the right of the Chagos Islanders to return to
their homeland. The decision was met with protests by the Chagossians and their
supporters in Britain and throughout the world.
“There are a lot of Chagossian people in front of the court today and we
are very sad about this decision,” Hengride Permel of the Chagos Island
Community Association told Al Jazeera on Oct. 22. “It was a chance for
the British government to right a wrong. ... It is a shameful day for the
government.” Permel said the Chagossian people would deliver a letter of
protest to Prime Minister Gordon Brown asking that he overturn the
decision.
In addition to the forced relocation of the Chagossians to Britain, many were
also taken to Mauritius, also located in the Indian Ocean.
According to the British-based solicitor Richard Gifford, who represented the
Chagossians in their case: “It has been the misfortune of the Chagos
Islanders that their passionate desire to return to their homeland has been
caught up in the power politics of foreign policy for the past 40 years. Sadly,
their struggle to regain their paradise lost has been dismissed on legal
grounds, but the political possibilities remain open for Parliament, the
British public and the international community to continue to support [their
return].”
Significance of the British and U.S. removal
During the mid-1960s the U.S. claimed that it was concerned about possible
Soviet expansion in the Indian Ocean and wanted to establish a base in the
region on an island with no population.
In a secret deal, which was never revealed to the U.S. Congress or the British
Parliament, a payment of $11 million was made to lease the territory from
Britain, which controlled the area as a colony.
The first choice of the U.S. was the island of Aldabra, just north of
Madagascar. However, Aldabra was a breeding ground for giant tortoises, which
interfered with potential military activity and whose removal could have drawn
controversy from ecologists.
As an alternative they targeted the Chagos Islands, alongside neighboring
Mauritius, which were ruled by the British. At the same time there was an
independence struggle going on demanding that Britain relinquish control of
both territories.
In 1965 Britain agreed to grant independence to Mauritius only after the Chagos
Islands were separated from the deal. The British then created what was called
the British Indian Ocean Territory. This unilateral act on the part of Britain
stripped the Chagos Islands residents of any rights to determine their
destiny.
A telegram sent to the British mission at the United Nations in 1965 framed the
argument that would be made to the international community. The memo stated
“We recognise that we are in a difficult position as regards references
to people at present on the detached islands.
“We know that a few were born on Diego Garcia and perhaps some of the
other islands, and so were their parents before them. We cannot therefore
assert that there are no permanent inhabitants, however much this would have
been to our advantage. In these circumstances, we think it would be best to
avoid all references to permanent inhabitants.”
The people who were forced to leave the island were later refused re-entry.
When the U.S. military forces arrived on Diego Garcia, the remaining residents
were rounded up and deported to Mauritius.
Need to close all U.S. bases illustrated
Even today in the U.S. military occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, the base
established on the Chagos Islands during the 1960s is being utilized.
A recent Al Jazeera article points out that “Diego Garcia has been used
in U.S. military campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the British government
has argued that it would not be right for the Chagossians to be allowed home,
citing security concerns.” (Oct. 22)
Consequently, the real reason why the Chagossians are not being allowed to
return to their homeland is because of the imperialist aims of the U.S. and
Britain. This is why anti-war forces must not only demand the withdrawal of
military forces from both Iraq and Afghanistan, but they must also insist that
all foreign bases be closed and that the Indigenous inhabitants of these
territories be given full rights to return to their homes.
The lessons of the seizure and occupation of the Chagos Islands points out that
the imperialist states will create falsehoods to justify their military and
territorial ambitions. The exposure of these lies sheds further light on the
fact that the so-called “war on terrorism” is nothing but a
continuation of the aims and objectives of world imperialism.
ν
Abayomi Azikiwe is the editor of the Pan-African News Wire.
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
[email protected]
Subscribe
[email protected]
Support independent news
DONATE