UN: On the rights of Indigenous peoples
By
Stephanie Hedgecoke
and
Mahtowin Munro
Published Sep 30, 2007 10:12 PM
After a decades-long struggle, the United Nations General Assembly on Sept. 13
approved the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Among other
points, the non-binding Declaration states that Indigenous peoples have the
right to maintain their cultures and remain on their land.
Only four countries in the UN General Assembly—the United States, Canada,
Australia and New Zealand, all settler states—voted against the
Declaration.
Reaction from Indigenous peoples and their organizations around the world was
mixed, but most recognized it as a partial victory resulting from a long
struggle. A selection is reported on below:
The International Indian Treaty Council stated: “This is the first time
that Indigenous Peoples have been recognized as ‘Peoples’ without
qualification in an international instrument. [It] recognizes Indigenous
Peoples’ inherent rights to self-determination, traditional lands,
territories and natural resources, cultures and sacred sites, means of
subsistence, languages, identities as well as their traditional life ways and
concepts of development based on free, prior and informed consent, among
others.”
The IITC noted that Indigenous representatives were not allowed to participate
in the most recent negotiating process between representatives of the
co-sponsoring states—in particular, Mexico, Peru, Guatemala and African
states—during which there were nine negotiated text changes in the
Declaration language.
But, according to the IITC, the modifications “did not include any
changes to key provisions upholding self-determination, land and natural
resources, free prior informed consent, Treaties, and others. On that basis,
and to protect those essential provisions from being undermined, most
Indigenous Peoples either expressed their support for adoption of the modified
text, or stated, as did IITC, that they would not oppose it under the
circumstances.”
IPS news service reported criticism from Indigenous leaders Manuel Castro of
Ecuador and Luis Andrade of Colombia. “Twenty years of debate to produce
this document, and we end up with a non-binding declaration that does not force
governments to do anything; this is a disgrace,” said Castro,
spokesperson for the Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities of Ecuador.
“Very few Indigenous people are even aware of the existence of this
document.”
Andrade, president of the National Indigenous Organisation of Colombia, said
that “the level of representation of most Indigenous peoples was
extremely low.” He criticized Colombia’s abstention, the only one
in Latin America. “The administration [of right-wing President
Álvaro Uribe] threatens the right of Indigenous people and is their
enemy.”
Rigoberta Menchú Foundation spokesperson Elmer Erazo said the Declaration
is an advance “to the extent that Indigenous people make use of it.
It’s nothing to jump up and down about.” He said it is “a
weapon to be used by the people.”
In recent years, Indigenous struggles in the countries of Latin America have
gained substantial ground, especially in Ecuador and Bolivia. Indigenous
movements played a role in removing President Jamil Mahuad in Ecuador in
January 2000 and President Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada in Bolivia in October
2003.
Bolivia’s first Indigenous President, Evo Morales, said he welcomed the
vote. “These standards will help ensure that everyone has the same rights
and that we will stop being marginalized.”
Settler states vote against the Declaration
All four countries that voted against the Declaration are founded on the
historic and ongoing dispossession of their Indigenous peoples. Indigenous
populations in these countries are the most impoverished segments of the
population and are in the poorest health.
CBC News widely reported First Nations condemnation of Canada’s refusal
to support the Declaration. Mary Simon, president of the Inuit organization
Tapiriit Kanatami, worked with other Indigenous groups at the United Nations to
draft the declaration during the mid-1980s and early 1990s. She described Sept.
13 as a proud day for Inuit and Indigenous peoples around the world, but said
the negative votes reflects badly on Canada and the other three dissenting
governments.
Western Arctic Member of Parliament Dennis Bevington accused Canada of selling
out to multinational businesses that want access to resources on aboriginal
lands around the world.
Native Women’s Association of Canada President Beverley Jacobs said,
“I think they’re afraid of Indigenous people having some measure of
control of our own processes, of our own institutions, and dealing with our own
laws within our own territories.”
An IITC statement also criticized Canada’s vote.
“This day will be a red-letter day for Indigenous peoples of Aotearoa and
the globe,” said New Zealand’s Maori Party co-leader Tariana Turia.
“How can this government oppose a declaration which promotes and protects
what is meant to be merely a minimum standard of human rights for
Maori?”
The Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice
Commissioner, Tom Calma, welcomed the Declaration as a “milestone for the
world’s Indigenous peoples” and said it was “a matter of
great regret” that it was opposed by the Australian government.
Robert “Tim” Coulter, director of the Indian Law Resource Center in
Helena, Mont., was at the United Nations in New York City for the vote and was
quoted in The Spokesman Review newspaper (Spokane, Wash.) as saying, “It
was not a good day for the United States, but it was a good day for Indigenous
peoples.”
Coulter referred to recent U.S. attempts to legalize torture and said,
“The Bush administration in particular is contemptuous of human rights
rulings.”
At a recent United Nations news conference about the vote, Joseph Ole Simel,
Coordinator of the African Regional Indigenous Caucus, recalled why the text of
the Declaration had not been adopted in 2006. “The developed nations, in
particular Canada, New Zealand, Australia and the United States, had been
dictating to African countries and developing countries in general about human
rights, accountability, democracy and transparency.
“However, Third World countries have now taken a very progressive step in
terms of human rights and demonstrated a lot of goodwill and commitment to the
rights of Indigenous peoples, leaving the United States, Canada, Australia and
New Zealand behind.”
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
[email protected]
Subscribe
[email protected]
Support independent news
DONATE