Mistrial in Watada resister court martial
Published Feb 15, 2007 9:09 PM
After making its case badly at the Ft. Lewis, Wash., court-martial of war
resister Lt. Ehren Watada, the Army prosecution team requested and was granted
a mistrial. The unorthodox handing of this case has raised the possibility that
the U.S. Army might have to free Watada, who had faced four years in
Watada is the first officer to refuse duty in Iraq. Since his announcement last
spring that he would refuse, the lieutenant has been a strong spokesperson for
anti-war sentiment. He participated in a conference of anti-war veterans in the
summer and made a speech that has been played all over the country at meetings
large and small.
Both his parents have been supportive of Watada’s action, and they both
have been speaking around the country on his behalf. For the Jan. 27 protests,
his father spoke in Washington to over 100,000 people while his mother spoke on
the West Coast.
Hundreds of people, many of them veterans, and including actor Sean Penn and
other military war resisters, with a large contingent from Iraq Veterans
Against the War, had come to Watada’s court-martial to show their support
at the Feb. 5 opening and throughout the trial. The judge made all decisions in
the first days of the trial to prevent the lieutenant from bringing up his
principled opposition to the Iraq war as part of his defense.
Nevertheless, the prosecution apparently believed they failed to make a strong
case against Watada, so lead prosecutor Capt. Scott Van Sweringen asked for the
mistrial. The defense objected, but Lt. Col. Judge John Head granted the
prosecution the ability to re-present their case at a different time in the
Eric Seitz is Lt. Watada’s civilian lawyer. Seitz said, “The
mistrial is very likely to have the consequence of ending this case because a
retrial would be a case of double jeopardy based on the military rules for
courts martial and applicable case law.” Seitz added that if the Army
attempted to try Watada again, he would ask for dismissal of the charges with
prejudice so they could not be filed again. “I do not expect a retrial to
ever occur,” stated Seitz.
Watada’s military defense lawyer—appointed by the Army—Capt.
Mark Kim, said that he agreed with Seitz’s interpretation of military
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Support independent news DONATE