The STRIVE Act
Corporate-designed immigration reform
By
Javier Rodriguez
Published Apr 15, 2007 10:30 PM
The debate in the nation on immigration reform is definitely on
this spring and the cards are once again stacked. The
Gutierrez-Flake STRIVE Act of 2007 is a corporate monster most of
the way. It doesn’t come close to meeting the human rights
standards set forth by the international community for the more
than 200 million migrants on the planet who, by designs of
corporate globalization and its rising capitalist transnational
class, have been forced to leave their home countries in search
of a new life.
On the contrary the new STRIVE Act, like last year’s failed
Sensenbrenner-HR4437 and Hegel-Martinez S2611, will criminalize
immigrants and allow enforcement of immigration law by police
agencies. It calls for more extreme border enforcement and calls
for building 20 more detention centers for immigrants. It will
erode human rights for future deportees and future immigrants,
impose an employer verification program and delay legalization
for the 13 million immigrants already here for many years. Not
surprisingly, it does not set realistic standards to resolve the
immigration issue—period.
Overall, if approved, the STRIVE Act will further set back the
struggle for immigrant empowerment, make present and future
immigrant workers more vulnerable to exploitation and drive them
further underground.
The international criteria for immigrants set in 1987 say
migrants, within three years of living in the host country, have
earned their right to legalize their status. By then, they have
established roots in their adopted communities, creating family,
children, culture, education, business and religion. This is a
sounder humane approach to a real earned right to legalization,
to be united with their families and to the stabilization of
their lives.
In 1986, through the IRCA Immigration Reform Act, several million
urban and farm workers, undocumented immigrants, regularized
their status through a radically different set of standards: a
one-year wait for their permanent residency and five more for
citizenship and the right to vote without having to leave the
country. The farm worker clause was even more humane, with a
requirement of only three months of farm work in the previous two
years to qualify. It set forth a fee of only $150 per applicant.
That’s it. It was a family-oriented law, though far from
perfect.
Now compare. By Rep. Luis Gutierrez’s own words, under the
STRIVE Act the legalization part will not be implemented for two
years until Congress confirms that the security border
enforcement measures of the new law are in place. Only then will
the legalization process begin.
Then the first of two three-year permits for non-immigrant status
will be issued, with the right to a social security card, a
driver’s license and to leave and return to the country.
After the sixth year the immigrant will have the right to solicit
permanent residency. But instead of an automatic green card into
the hands of the 13 million immigrants, all applicants will be
placed in the back of the line for another 5 to 10-year wait,
until the applications of 3 million plus potential immigrants now
in process, which the STRIVE Act does not address, are
resolved.
The delay does not stop there. There will be an added five-year
wait to qualify for citizenship and the right to vote, which
means, approximately a total 18 to 21 years to exert full-earned
constitutional rights which all U.S. citizens now enjoy under the
Constitution. Is this a corporate panacea or not?
The proposed House bill also establishes a quota for 450,000
yearly “conditional workers,” a euphemism for the old
guest worker program. Conditional workers will have the right to
two three-year working permits with the right to change jobs, to
organize, bring their families and children with the right to
school, to a driver’s license, a social security card and
lastly, with existing good moral conduct and no criminal
background, the right to legalize their status.
Seductive, isn’t it. But like their 13-million immigrant
counterparts already in the U.S., who, hypothetically speaking,
will be waiting in line for years for the coveted green card,
this sector will be highly vulnerable to small and large
corporate business misconduct. Admittedly though, on par, the
future undocumented sector will be several notches more
exploitable.
According to leaks emanating from the Capitol in the last two
weeks, the Kennedy-McCain Senate proposal will use the same
framework of S2611 which died last year. If so, for certain the
conciliation process between the House and Senate will be a
watering-down process for the Flake-Gutierrez bill.
For the immigrant rights movement and allies the central question
is: What is to be done? Already at the gate in tacit support of
this concept is a powerful conglomerate of the most active wing
of labor, big business, the Latino establishment, Democrats and
Republicans, the church hierarchy, the Mexican and Central
American governments and the moderate wing of the immigrant
rights movement. And it is well-financed with a war chest of $4
million.
The accomplishments of the 2006 mass immigrant struggle are
historic. Most notable was energizing the electorate and along
with the anti-war sentiment changing the correlation of forces in
Congress against the extreme right. Without a doubt President
George W. Bush and the Republicans are in a weaker position,
although his shock troops have launched a near-fascist campaign
against the country’s undocumented population, creating
havoc and terror.
At this point the correlation of forces is absolutely not
favorable, except that the country’s progressive forces and
allies are moving from traditional lobbying towards mass
mobilization in an attempt to gain the upper hand and influence
the national debate for a more inclusive pro-worker immigration
reform. The activists’ response to the government’s
ICE raids and deportations campaign has been toe to toe and, it
appears, has set the conditions for another round of mega mass
mobilizations. We shall see if the people respond accordingly
again on May 1, International Workers Day, in defense of their
dignity and humanity. The challenge is as historic as in
2006.
Javier Rodriguez is the media and political strategist for
the March 25 Coalition and a co-founder of the May 1st National Movement.
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
[email protected]
Subscribe
[email protected]
Support independent news
DONATE