Figleaf on occupation of Iraq is in ‘chaos’
By
Deirdre Griswold
Published Mar 30, 2005 10:00 AM
When will it finally sink into the heads of
those in Washington dazzled with dreams of ever wider empire that they will have
to scale down their global ambitions? Only, it seems, when the revolt against
them tears apart the social fabric of their profit-driven system.
Look at
the news from Iraq. The farce of building an “Iraqi government”
under conditions of atrocious U.S. military occupation stumbles on, part
tragedy, part comedy. Of course, it is not an Iraqi government. It is a colonial
imposition ushered in through a weird election process in which most of the
candidates were anonymous. Even then, those “elected” know the Iraqi
people expect them to somehow get the U.S. troops out, but Washington sees them
as a figleaf for its continued occupation. A big contradiction.
It is
ludicrous to think that, after having destroyed every semblance of normalcy in
Iraq, the U.S. can just pull a new government out of a hat. But the media here
are going along with this fiction and talking about the political process in
Iraq as though it actually was indigenous and democratic and not manufactured to
suit the interests of the occupiers.
As of this writing, the Iraqi
“parliament” after two months has been unable to set up a government
or agree on a constitution. It is bogged down in wrangling over posts—
especially the key post of oil minister. Press reports describe its latest
meeting, on March 29, as ending in “chaos.”
As a reminder that
this fruitless debate is being carried out against the backdrop of a determined
popular resistance to U.S. occupation, the area of the Green Zone where the
National Assembly was meeting was hit by several mortar rounds shortly before
the session ended.
The political struggle is merely over which groupings
will get to siphon off a little of the country’s riches into their own
pockets. As long as the Pentagon is there and wielding the real power, it is a
foregone conclusion that the lion’s share of Iraqoil revenues will go to
enrich Halliburton and other U.S. energy corporations, with their related
financial institutions, that are behind the aggressive global strategy of the
Bush administration.
Meanwhile, the resistance continues and is sinking
the morale of the U.S. troops. They don’t want to be there but there are
fewer and fewer new recruits to replace them. Young workers are beginning to
realize they have no stake in this war and that getting killed or maimed while
suppressing the people of another country is not worth the inflated promises of
job training and benefits that even military recruiters are beginning to
doubt.
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld may want Congress to allocate
vast new sums of money for an even higher-tech army of the future to fight the
next war—something the legislators are groaning about given the already
huge budget deficits and social cutbacks—but that won’t help the
Pentagon get enough soldiers right now to stabilize the occupations in both Iraq
and Afghanistan.
So, as has happened with every “dirty”
colonial war in the past, the U.S. government is using the most vicious and
diabolical—and illegal—methods to try to intimidate the civilian
population and sap their support for the resistance.
Just like the French
in Algeria, the British in Malaya and Kenya, the Dutch in Indonesia, the
Japanese in China and their own predecessors at the time of the Vietnam and
Korean wars, the empire builders in Washington have given a thumbs up to
indiscriminate bombing of civilians, the use of torture, the beating and killing
of families in their own homes, and a terror campaign against journalists who
would tell the true story of the war.
Reports continue to get
out—very rarely in the corporate media—of the horrible situation in
Falluja when U.S. troops bombarded and finally captured that city. People all
over the Arab world have seen the photos of fathers shot in their own beds,
bloated corpses in the streets, patients at the main hospital lined up on the
ground under the guns of U.S. soldiers.
The Pentagon itself now admits
that the deaths of 31 people it had detained in Afghanistan and Iraq are
confirmed or suspected homicides. The International Red Cross has said that the
interrogation techniques used by the U.S. are “tantamount to
torture.”One Iraqi lieutenant colonel died in January 2004 of “blunt
force injuries and asphyxia” after being lifted to his feet by a baton
held against his throat, according to a U.S. Army official.
No one knows
how many people have been seized and disappeared into detention and
interrogation centers, but it is undoubtedly thousands. There are almost 600 at
Guantanamo alone, and the government admits having many more secret
facilities.
Many in the U.S. may have been brainwashed to see them as
“terrorists,” but to the people of the Middle East and much of the
rest of the world, they are heroes in the struggle against foreign aggression,
people who were tortured to death because they refused to capitulate to those
trying to take over their countries.
With the deliberate attempt of U.S.
soldiers to kill Italian journalist Giuliana Sgre na in Iraq, the spotlight is
now on how dangerous it has become to report the truth.
But returning
soldiers are beginning to bring that truth home with them. And as the true face
of capitalist globalization is seen more clearly, here in the U.S. as well as
abroad, the resistance to it can only rise.
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
[email protected]
Subscribe
[email protected]
Support independent news
DONATE