Where is U.S.-Japanese rivalry heading

By Sam Marcy (March 30, 1995)

Many momentous questions have been raised by the poison-gas incident that has caused such a tragic loss of life in Tokyo's subway system. The evidence presented to the public so far points to a well- organized conspiracy. The question is, by whom?

Regrets will of course be forthcoming from the imperialist rivals of Japan, as well as from neighboring countries. But this is the small change of history.

This unprecedented attack takes place when the Western imperialists are more mindful than ever of Japan's potential for assuming economic, political, and ultimately military leadership in the region, even though these seem very distant at the present time.

The struggle now, as it always has been, is a struggle for economic advantage among the ruling classes of each of the contending powers.

Behind Clinton's trip to Russia

The U.S. is not at all a disinterested observer of what goes on in this vital area. President Bill Clinton's plan to visit Russia is not just to give Boris Yeltsin a public pat on the back. It is also meant to remind Japan of U.S. imperialist interest in Asia.

It is not the poisoning of thousands of individuals in Japan that will preoccupy President Clinton in his forthcoming talks with Yeltsin. What will be preoccupying them and their aides is the rising interest of Japanese investment capital throughout the entire region.

Is this not a repeat of the imperialist rivalries of the late 1920s and early '30s? Is not the U.S. again attempting to rally French, British and German imperialism, with whom the U.S. has been at loggerheads, against the "yellow peril"?

Times have changed, of course. The language has become more refined and gentlemanly. But imperialist appetites are just as voracious as ever and the stupendous development of the productive forces everywhere continually shifts the emphasis from purely economic rivalry to political struggle.

And if that is not sufficient, then what? Isn't that what is occupying the thinking and the maneuvering in the capitals of the imperialist powers? It is in this regard that one must view President Clinton's hurried announcement of a trip to Russia. Why to Russia, all of a sudden? It is true that Yeltsin has for some time been trying to get Clinton to come for purely domestic reasons--to bolster his own waning political strength. But that is not Clinton's reason for going.

Clinton needs to shore up U.S. diplomatic strength in Russia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East and above all in the Pacific.

Because of the internecine struggles in the Middle East, it might have appeared that U.S. imperialist interest there was waning. But the larger interest of U.S. capital in combating Japanese expansion makes it incumbent for them to "show the flag" in order not to leave the impression that the U.S. is slowly being outdistanced by its imperialist rivals.

The economic power of Japan could become a formidable factor in the Middle East if political obstacles created by other imperialist powers were not so overwhelming.

Isn't this why World War II was fought? And isn't the situation today really a repetition of what preceded that war?

Imperialist Germany and Japan were shorn of their military and naval power after the war. But they are putting up a deadly struggle for economic supremacy similar to the way the U.S. first overcame Britain in the early 1920s. Ludwell Denny, in his well-known book "America Conquers Britain," showed how the U.S. superseded British economic influence and power south of the U.S. border. Britain was not in a position to contemplate a military solution at the time.

Only one way out

What all this demonstrates is that the interminable imperialist contradictions and rivalries inevitably lead to military conflict. Only a socialist solution to the economic problems is a just one.

Only the working class, by taking destiny into its own hands, can avoid the incalculable disasters of military struggle and spare humanity yet another devastating capitalist war.

The situation cries out for a truly socialist solution among the community of nations in the area.



Main menu Yearly menu