A tale of two invasions
Imperialism’s legacy in Afghanistan
Published Sep 9, 2010 11:07 PM
On Aug. 31, USA Today reported 1,985 NATO coalition deaths in Afghanistan, with
1,248 of them U.S. troops. More than 7,000 have been seriously wounded.
July and August were the most costly months to NATO forces in almost a decade
of war and invasion. The Pentagon is attempting to carry out its ballyhooed
“surge,” which is supposed to get the U.S. out of the quagmire it
has created for itself in Afghanistan.
Of course, these numbers pale when compared to deaths of the Afghan civilians
and freedom fighters who, according to one conservative estimate, have suffered
nearly 20,000 deaths.
Conservative pundits such as Charles Krauthammer have already begun to blame
the Obama administration for a potential defeat. He accuses Obama of
“giving our enemy sustenance” by even mentioning the possibility of
a U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan by July 2011. (Washington Post, Sept. 5)
Most people, in the U.S. and around the world, think the date should be much
An imperialist legacy
In 1839, the British government decided to invade Afghanistan, ostensibly to
forestall the Czarist Russian government from increasing its influence there.
Their real reason was to support the expansion of the British East India
The British achieved some initial “success”: they killed a lot of
Afghans, installed a puppet government and settled down for a long occupation.
Large bags of gold, literally, were handed out to buy off traditional tribal
Three years later, an entire British army of more than 14,000 men lay dead
along the banks of the Kabul River, slaughtered as they tried to escape through
the mountain passes. The headless, dismembered corpse of the chief British
general hung in the marketplace of Kabul, while the Afghan puppet ruler
attempted (unsuccessfully) to convince other Afghans that he had helped
persuade the British to leave. (Steven Tanner, “Afghanistan: A Military
History,” Da Capo Press, 2009)
The British tried again in 1878, and again they failed. However, before they
withdrew, they “preserved British honor” by massacring whole
villages and hanging militants from almost every lamppost in Kabul.
In 1893, the British imperialist government in India decided to draw a border
between Afghanistan and British India (which included modern Pakistan). Having
failed disastrously in two previous attempts, the British goals were to grab as
much of the land and population of Afghanistan as they could, establish a
defensive perimeter and control the vital passes through the Hindu Kush
Afghanistan lost a third of its population and some of its most fertile land,
the Peshawar region, in what is today northwestern Pakistan. These are the
so-called Northwest Territories, a center of resistance to the U.S. occupation
of Afghanistan and home to 25 million ethnic Pashtuns. Pashtuns also comprise
more than 50 percent of the population of Afghanistan.
The British never went back until 2001 — when they joined the U.S.-led
NATO coalition in Afghanistan.
This same region has suffered from unprecedented flooding recently, with more
than 14 million people affected. More than 1 million people are still stranded
and starving. The U.S./U.N. response of $460 million in aid was recently
dwarfed by private Muslim charities, which contributed $1 billion from around
the world. More is needed.
However, the principal concern of mainstream pundits has been that the Taliban
— which was among the first to offer aid to the victims — may
“take advantage” of the flooding to increase their influence. To
make their point, the U.S. launched a drone attack that killed an unknown
number of people in Peshawar while the flooding was still in progress.
The U.S. seems to be following the template laid down by the British in the
nineteenth century. Whether events will turn out the same, or whether the U.S.
ruling class will learn from history, remains to be seen.
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: [email protected]
Subscribe [email protected]
Support independent news DONATE