The media and Gaza
A military-industrial-media complex
Published Nov 28, 2010 9:34 PM
WW presents here the third installment of “The media and
Gaza,” a chapter from an upcoming book on the heroic struggle of the
Palestinian people of Gaza who are fighting for self-determination.
In 1944, when the U.S. was becoming the dominant power in the Middle East, the
U.S. State Department described Middle Eastern oil as “a stupendous
source of strategic power, and one of the greatest material prizes in world
Washington’s assessment of that area has not changed.
“The Middle East, with two thirds of the world’s oil and the lowest
cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies,” said Dick Cheney. This
was in 1999, when he was still CEO of Halliburton, the world’s
second-largest provider of equipment and services to oil and gas companies.
Cheney was George H. W. Bush’s secretary of defense before his stint at
Halliburton and later became George W. Bush’s vice president. This is not
“Cheney once drew parallels between his role as CEO of Halliburton and
his role as secretary of defense. Addressing the Gulf Coast Association of
Geological Societies convention in Corpus Christie in 1998, he stated:
“In the oil and gas business, I deal with many of the same people.”
(CorpWatch, July 25, 2000)
Understanding the needs and wants of the oil companies is a big plus for those
aspiring to high government office, since Washington safeguards these needs and
wants. Condoleezza Rice prepared for her roles as George W. Bush’s
national security advisor and then secretary of state by first representing an
oil company. She was on Chevron’s board of directors and even headed the
oil giant’s committee on public policy.
Oil companies also mesh with the huge Pentagon apparatus that protects them.
Currently on Chevron’s board is Donald Rice, who was Bill Clinton’s
secretary of the Air Force from 1989 to 1993.
The media monopolies are not far behind, as many have interlocking directors
with big oil. General Electric (NBC) interlocks with Mobil, CNN with Chevron,
Knight-Ridder with Phillips Petroleum, the New York Times with Texaco (whose
parent company is Chevron). And some “public” television news shows
are connected to Big Oil through ad revenues. Chevron is a key funder of the
most influential show on PBS, the nightly “News Hour with Jim
Lehrer.” (FAIR, Dec. 19, 2007)
This is why Washington officials, Chevron and the New York Times speak with one
A military-industrial-media complex
Oil companies are not the only U.S. corporations making money hand over fist.
Arms sellers are awash in profits. In 2005, for example, the top military
contractors had a record $25 billion to $30 billion in cash in their coffers.
Lockheed Martin, the largest arms seller in the world and the biggest supplier
of weapons to Israel, topped the list. (New York Times, May 12, 2005)
There is an incestuous relationship between Big Oil, the weapons makers and the
media. Oil companies want a strong military presence in the Middle East to
protect them from the people whose resources they exploit. In addition, the
military machine that protects oil company interests is itself the largest
consumer of oil in the world. And because the media monopolies interlock with
both, they are in on the take when both make profits.
How does the military exert its influence on the media?
For one thing, the big media welcome ads from the weapons makers. Lockheed
Martin is a major advertiser on CNN, which is owned by Time-Warner. Boeing is a
major funder of PBS’s “Washington Week.”
Some media are actually owned by arms merchants. NBC’s parent company is
General Electric. GE Aviation makes the propulsion systems found on U.S.
aircraft sold to the Israeli Air Force, including the F-16 Fighting Falcon and
F-4 Phantom, the CH-53 heavy lift helicopter, the Apache attack helicopter and
UH-60 Black Hawk utility helicopter, as well as the Israeli-made Kfir fighter
plane. Some of the attack helicopters GE outfits are used in the occupied
territories. GE also makes parts for Hellfire II laser-guided missiles as well
as T-700 and 701C jet engines used by the Israeli Defense Forces. (Seattle
Palestine Solidarity Committee)
So when reporters, analysts and guest “experts” at NBC find excuses
to justify Israel’s attack on Gaza, they don’t mention that their
salaries are paid by a company that makes a mint providing the very weapons
that Israel used. NBC doesn’t make a cent from exposing the terrible toll
these weapons have taken.
Another way the arms makers influence the media is through corporate interlocks
with media companies that weld together their interests.
This relationship between media and the military has become such a fixture that
it is an integral part of the for-profit capitalist system. Normon Solomon
explained that “a military-industrial-media complex ... now extends to
much of corporate media. ... Often, media magnates and people on the boards of
large media-related corporations enjoy close links — financial and social
— with the military industry and Washington’s foreign policy
establishment.” (War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning
Us to Death, Norman Solomon, Wiley & Sons, 2005)
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: [email protected]
Subscribe [email protected]
Support independent news DONATE