Supply-route losses hamper NATO occupation
Published Feb 15, 2009 10:57 PM
The U.S. and its NATO allies face an extremely difficult challenge in
Afghanistan. How can they supply the troops they have there?
More troops—the U.S. has floated the idea of an additional 30,000 to
40,000—will mean a bigger challenge.
An overturned truck lies on a destroyed
bridge in the
Khyber area near
Most of the U.S. and NATO supplies come from Pakistan through the Khyber Pass.
This is 80 percent of what they use—everything except weapons and
ammunition, which come by air. (Christian Science Monitor, Feb. 4).
There is growing resistance in Pakistan to supporting the U.S., and the Afghan
resistance has made this treacherous mountain pass a priority target.
Last week, according to the Daily Times of Pakistan, they blew up “a
British-era iron bridge near Ali Masjid in Khyber Agency.” The blast was
powerful enough to break windows in nearby buildings, but two additions bombs
didn’t go off. If they had, the Pakistani authorities would have had a
very difficult time replacing a completely destroyed bridge, rather than
The day the bomb went off in the Khyber Pass, the Kyrgyz president, Kurmanbek
Bakiyev, announced that Kyrgyzstan would no longer allow the U.S. to use its
airbase at Manas, which has been a convenient staging ground for U.S. air
shipments destined for northern Afghanistan.
While the U.S. and British press made a big deal of the $2.15 billion aid
package that Kyrgyzstan got from Russia, the English-language Russian TV
channel RT in a Feb. 7 report concentrated on the rape charges against a U.S.
airman, who had diplomatic immunity. RT also interviewed Kyrgyz farmers living
near the base who were upset with U.S. planes dumping fuel before they
The U.S. currently has permission to move nonlethal supplies through Kyrgyzstan
territory, which involves landing them in the Ukraine then transporting the
supplies most of the way to Manas by train. The U.S. also uses the Soviet-built
airport at Manas for air cargo.
However, given the tense state of relations between the U.S. and Russia, the
Pentagon planners want to come up with a logistical scheme that avoids Russia,
and of course Pakistan.
One route currently under active consideration starts on Georgia’s Black
Sea coast and heads across the Caucasus by rail to Azerbaijan, where supplies
would be loaded onto ships to cross the Caspian Sea to Kazakhstan. Then
they’d be loaded back onto trains. Supplies would go via rail to Termez
While this cumbersome and obviously expensive possible supply route avoids
Russia, any number of political changes and permutations could make it
untenable, not to mention expensive. Given the current economic crisis, the
expense of this operation is the more important factor.
The Sunday Times of London (Feb. 8) reported that U.S. Defense Secretary Robert
Gates has postponed deciding whether to send an additional 17,000 troops after
he couldn’t answer some of President Barack Obama’s questions about
an exit strategy.
The U.S. and its imperialist allies are finding it more and more difficult to
overcome the resistance to their domination and occupation in Central Asia, or
even to reach a satisfactory stalemate.
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: [email protected]
Subscribe [email protected]
Support independent news DONATE