Follow workers.org on
RED HOT: TRAYVON MARTIN
AFGHANISTAN, FIGHTING RACISM, OCCUPY WALL STREET,
PEOPLE'S POWER, SAVE OUR POST OFFICES, WOMEN, AFRICA,
LIBYA, WISCONSIN WORKERS FIGHT BACK, SUPPORT STATE & LOCAL WORKERS,
EGYPT, NORTH AFRICA & MIDDLE EAST,
STOP FBI REPRESSION, RESIST ARIZONA RACISM, NO TO FRACKING, DEFEND PUBLIC EDUCATION, ANTI-WAR,
CUBA, CLIMATE CHANGE,
JOBS JOBS JOBS,
STOP FORECLOSURES, IRAN,
IRAQ, CAPITALIST CRISIS,
IMMIGRANTS, LGBT, POLITICAL PRISONERS,
Expansion of U.S. bases spurs Philippine resistance
Published Mar 29, 2008 10:53 AM
A category of semi-secret U.S. bases is vastly extending the Pentagon’s
military presence around the globe. Innocuously called CSLs, for Cooperative
Security Locations, these bases are a new, covert form of intervention.
The CSLs and other loose security agreements allow the Pentagon to set up
facilities and structures, lease warehouses, and maintain roads, airstrips and
seaports using a combination of private contractors and local forces. The
Pentagon maintains a network of military bases in about 70 countries. But the
new Collective Security Locations are being established in up to 100 other
Senior Editor Adam J. Hebert wrote an article in the August 2006 Air Force
Magazine online entitled “Presence, Not Permanence” that described
the Pentagon’s changing approach to its worldwide bases and its need,
since the collapse of the Soviet Union, to reorganize and break out of its
“strategically obsolete Cold War straitjacket.”
Hebert described how, with the closing of bases, such as in Iceland, the Air
Force didn’t bring home large numbers of airmen but instead updated its
basing structure with a series of new locations and temporary bases.
Asia Times online of June 1, 2005, reporting on an earlier background briefing
by a senior official of the Defense Department, explained that the U.S. had
been operating from “5,458 distinct and discrete military installations
around the world. ... We don’t need those little pieces of property
The Commission on Review of the Overseas Military Facility Structure of the
U.S., also known as the Overseas Basing Commission, was established by Congress
to conduct a thorough study on the global re-alignment of U.S. bases. The
commission defined a series of new basing arrangements.
The CSLs were supposedly envisioned as facilities with little or no permanent
U.S. presence, maintained with contractor and/or host nation support. They
contain prepositioned equipment and are rapidly scalable and expandable. The
Overseas Basing Commission also defines Forward Operating Sites as places with
prepositioned equipment that can host rotational forces and be a focus for
bilateral and regional training.
Other categories, such as Forward Support Location, Preposition Site, and En
Route Infrastructure, are defined as new base arrangements beyond the
traditional Main Operating Base that has permanently stationed combat forces
and command and control structures.
The expanding U.S. military presence throughout East, South and Central Asia
appears to be focused on surrounding and attempting to isolate the growing
influence of China.
The Pentagon also uses joint military exercises to exert overwhelming influence
over the militaries of many smaller and developing nations. Former U.S. Pacific
Command head Admiral Thomas Fargo explained in March 2003 that relationships
built through exercises and training are “our biggest guarantor of access
in time of need.”
There are CSLs in Thailand, throughout South and Central Asia, and in Senegal,
Growing popular struggles against the joint military exercises and the CSL
bases in the Philippines may have an impact on anti-base struggles around the
For over 110 years the Philippines has been U.S. imperialism’s prime
military outpost and stepping stone to China and the Asian mainland. U.S. bases
in the Philippines enabled the U.S. military to control strategic sea
Philippine law has banned U.S. bases since a mass movement forced them out in
1992. Yet today 30,000 to 50,000 U.S. troops are stationed there and are in
constant operation. Under the Balikatan joint war exercises, the Pentagon is
bringing in logistical equipment and building installations.
According to a Feb. 26 report from Foreign Policy in Focus, the number of
troops, ships, equipment and infrastructure grows each year. The year 2005 saw
24 joint military exercises involving U.S. and Philippine troops. This grew to
37 scheduled exercises in 2006—or one U.S. military exercise every 10
“Training missions” and military exercises mean a continuing
presence of U.S. troops in the Philippines. It also comes with a special name:
the Joint Special Operations Task Force-Philippines. The JSOTF-P has been based
in the Philippines for more than six years on an ongoing “temporary
training mission.” The U.S. stay has become open-ended and, as with the
“temporary” CSL bases, its permanence is unofficial and
Immediately after 9/11 Washington used as an excuse for the re-entry of its
forces that the Philippines needed help in fighting a “terrorist
threat” from a small, secretive armed group known as Abu Sayyaf. The
Manila Times of Aug. 27, 2007, reported that, “Even as the United States
denies plans to set up a military base in the Philippines, the American
military is reportedly building a host of projects across Mindanao.”
A Rand Corporation report prepared for the U.S. Air Force entitled
“Ungoverned Territories” and available online summarizes U.S.
military presence globally. It highlights the Pakistan/Afghanistan border area,
East Africa, West Africa, the Caucasus, the Venezuela/Colombia border and
Mindanao Island in the Philippines. The U.S. “area of operations”
in the Philippines presently covers 8,000 square miles, including the entire
island of Mindanao and surrounding islands.
Paying for occupation
In the Philippines and many other underdeveloped countries drowning in debt,
the “host” country must pay for the U.S. military presence.
According to a Mutual Logistics Support Agreement, available online, that the
Philippines signed with the U.S. in November 2002, the Philippine government
must supply the Pentagon with all the logistical support needed during the
endless military and training “exercises” and “other U.S.
military deployments” to maintain their forces in the region. This
Support Agreement lists everything from food and water to ammunition, spare
parts and components, billeting, transportation, communication, medical
services, operation support, training services, repair and maintenance, storage
services, port services and construction of “temporary
Everything the U.S. used to supply for its own use at its former bases in the
region, such as the giant Clark Air Base and Subic Bay Naval Base, is now to be
provided by the impoverished Philippine government on an as-need basis.
The newsletter U.S. Intervention Watch, published by Initiatives for Peace in
Mindanao in coordination with US Troops Out Now! Mindanao Coalition, explains
that the widely publicized U.S. humanitarian missions are really military
operations and a cover for a permanent military presence.
“The objective is not to provide health care to peasant farmers, but to
secure U.S. economic interests in the Asia-Pacific by turning the Philippines
into a base of operation. This base will serve to protect U.S. multi-billion
dollar investments and promote prospective commerce in the Philippines in oil,
energy, minerals and plantations, keep an eye on the Malacca Straits where 25
percent of all globally traded oil passes, and threaten nearby China as its
rise to global power continues,” says the newsletter.
Massacre made in USA
U.S. occupation troops bring attacks, massacres and rapes of the local civilian
population. According to a news article in Bulatlat, a weekly Philippine online
news magazine, “U.S. troops were present during the February 4 assault by
combined Army and Navy elite forces on Barangay village, Ipil, Maimbung, Sulu,
that killed eight non-combatants, including an Army soldier home on
Sulu’s Governor Abdulsakur Tan said: “This is not the first time
that the U.S. troops were reported to have taken part in Philippine military
operations in Sulu.” He corroborated the U.S. role in an attack in early
2007, when U.S. troops were supposedly doing “road construction” in
the village of Barangay Bato-Bato, Indanan.
Temogen Tulawie, convener of the Concerned Citizens of Sulu and former Jolo
councilor, said the latest massacre is part of a larger picture. Starting in
2003, Balikatan military exercises were held in Sulu. This provoked waves of
protest from the people, who still remember an historic massacre committed in
1906 when hundreds of Moro resistance fighters were gunned down by U.S.
Kawagib Moro Human Rights Organization and Suara Bangsamoro have filed a case before the U.N. Human Rights Council on the latest massacre.
The U.S. military presence is no longer covert in the Philippines. A mass
movement is paying growing attention and mobilizing against this new form of
U.S. occupation. As Initiatives for Peace and U.S. Troops Out Now! Mindanao
Coalition explained: “Mindanao has a long history of resistance to
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: [email protected]
Subscribe [email protected]
Support independent news DONATE