Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

From civil disobedience to lawsuits

Same-sex couples battle for right to marriage

By Leslie Feinberg

District attorneys and legislators, police and presidential hopefuls are trying to retake the beachheads after activism and widespread civil disobedience have pushed forward the struggle for equal access to civil marriage.

In a March 12 news conference, Massa chusetts Gov. Mitt Romney raised the possibility that he might try to block the state from carrying out a ruling by its highest court that Massachusetts must begin issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples on May 17.

In New York, in an extraordinary move by the state, the Ulster County district attorney filed criminal misdemeanor charges on March 15 against two Unitar ian ministers who performed same-sex marriages in New Paltz, N.Y.

The Revs. Dawn Sangrey and Kay Greenleaf, plus another minister for whom charges may still be pending, had married 25 couples on March 13. The two had also performed a dozen same-sex marriages a week earlier, after New Paltz Mayor Jason West was socked with 19 criminal counts for wedding more than 25 same-sex couples on Feb. 27.

A March 11 California Supreme Court order put a halt to issuing marriage licen ses in San Francisco to same-sex couples, pending a court review in May or June. More than 4,000 couples had been married in City Hall in the city by the bay in the 28 days prior to the court intervention.

More than 2,200 couples obtained marriage licenses in Portland, Ore., before the state attorney general there stepped in to put a halt to it.

The city of Asbury Park, N.J., stopped issuing licenses to same-sex couples on March 9, after an order from the state's attorney general. The city immediately sued the state to recognize the first marriage conducted there.

In both California and New Jersey, supporters of same-sex marriage access--including lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans couples and municipalities--filed countersuits in the courts.

But as Tom Teepen wrote in a March 16 column for Cox Newspapers, "The crush at welcoming city halls may be pushed back for now, but in its brief season it exposed a huge pent-up pressure among gays and lesbians to see their commitments secured. A social eruption like that, once vented, can very rarely be capped again."

And new fronts of civil disobedience and solidarity are opening up in the grassroots struggle to win equal access to civil marriage.

'Arrest us!'

African American leaders held a powerful rally and media conference on the steps of City Hall on March 14. One of the organizers, City Council Member Phil Reed, told reporters, "In the recent debate and discussion about same-sex marriage, the vast majority of images have been of Caucasian gays and lesbians.

"The truth of the matter is that there are hundreds of thousands of African Amer ican gays and lesbians, and many other groups, who are also supporters of same-sex marriage."

Organizations that took part in the rally included the National Black Justice Coali tion, African Ancestral Lesbians United for Societal Change and Gay Men of African Descent.

The NBJC has launched a countrywide campaign opposing a federal constitutional amendment that would deny the equal economic and social rights of civil marriage to same-sex couples.

Latinos and Latinas rallied in front of the Bronx courthouse in support of same-sex marriage rights on March 14. Mark Reyes said in a March 13 statement, "As you know, last week, with the leadership of the Bronx Lesbian and Gay Health Resource Consortium, we held a counter-demonstration to a group of Hispanic evangelical ministers who stood on the steps of the Bronx Courthouse and not only supported President Bush's constitutional amendment, but also spewed bigotry against the gay community in opposing civil marriage rights as well."

A group of some two dozen clergy converged outside police headquarters in Manhattan on March 11, decrying the legal injustice of denying same-sex marriage access. "This is bigotry. This is discrimination," stated Rabbi Sharon Kleinbaum. The group called on New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg to press state legislators to legalize marriage for all sexes.

The clergy informed the cops that they had performed weddings for same-sex couples and challenged: "We say to the authorities of New York, 'Arrest us'!"

Other Jewish and Christian clergy publicly vowed to wed couples on the steps of City Hall in Manhattan at 1 p.m. on March 18.

New Paltz Mayor Jason West has publicly vowed, "I will start conducting same-sex marriages again as soon as the injunction is removed." He reports that 1,000 of the 6,000 village residents rallied in defense at the courthouse on the day of his arraignment.

In Massachusetts, California, Oregon, Georgia, New Jersey, New York, Mich i gan, Maryland, Wisconsin, Kansas, Wash ing ton, West Virginia and other states this demand--marriage in form, for economic and social equality in content--is being fought out on many fronts.

Legislative attempts to codify inequality in state constitutions are resulting in wins, losses and draws. A storm of suits and countersuits is raging in the courts. The issue has injected itself into the presidential elections, despite the fact--and because of the fact--that both leading candidates of both big business parties oppose same-sex marriage.

And in villages, towns and cities across the country, individuals are confronting the authorities, insisting that the state recognize their right to equal access to civil marriage by issuing licenses.

Reprinted from the March 25, 2004, issue of Workers World newspaper

This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)

HOME :: U.S. NEWS :: WORLD NEWS :: EDITORIALS :: SUBSCRIBE :: DONATE