U.S. platoon refuses 'suicide mission' in Iraq
By Dustin Langley
On Oct. 13, soldiers from the 343rd Quartermaster Company,
based in Rock Hill, S.C., and stationed in Tallil, Iraq,
refused to drive seven unarmored fuel tankers to areas near
Baghdad where resistance attacks on convoys are an almost daily
occurrence.
The company has personnel from South Carolina, Alabama,
Kentucky, North Carolina and Mississippi. They arrived in Iraq
in April as part of the 13th Corps Support Command--a
15,000-strong logistics and supply unit.
Almost 90 percent of the company's troops are National Guard
members or reservists. Twenty-six have been killed thus
far.
The fuel-laden trucks they were ordered to drive could not
go faster than 40 miles per hour. Several of the vehicles had
mechanical problems. The platoon had also been informed that
the convoy would not be escorted by infantry in humvees or
helicopter gunships.
The incident received international news coverage after some
of the GIs managed to contact their relatives in the United
States.
It was the first reported incident of a large group of U.S.
troops in Iraq refusing orders.
Beverly Dobbs of Vandiver, Ala., told Salon magazine that
she got a panicked call from her son, Spec. Joseph Dobbs, on
Oct. 13. "Mama, we're in a lot of trouble," he said.
"We refused to go because our vehicles were in awful shape.
The place they wanted to send us was dangerous. We had to go
without guns. All of us refused to go. We're not risking our
lives like that."
"I'm proud of my son," said Renee Shealey of her son Scott,
one of 19 soldiers who refused orders to go on what the
soldiers called a "suicide mission" in Iraq.
The Army has said a "full investigation" of the incident is
under way and that disciplinary action would be meted out if
warranted.
Tod Ensign, legal director for Citizen Soldier, a
New-York-based GI/veterans' rights advocacy group, is demanding
access to Pfc. Colin Durham of Rock Hill, S.C. Nadine Stafford
of Rock Hill has asked Ensign to talk to Durham, her grandson,
and ascertain his current legal status and that of other
members of his unit.
History of resistance
Combat refusals are nothing new to the U.S. Army. As early
as 1813, a unit of 4,000 Kentucky soldiers declined to engage
Native forces that had just attacked Fort Dearborn (later
Chicago).
During the Mexican-American War, thousands of soldiers,
rebelling against anti-immigrant and anti-Catholic bigotry,
deserted the U.S. Army and joined the Mexican Army in its
struggle to fight the U.S. invasion. Led by Capt. John Riley of
County Galway, they formed the "San Patricio" Battalion and
fought bravely in most of the campaigns of the two-year
war.
This latest refusal by an entire platoon is reminiscent of
the Vietnam War. By 1970 in Vietnam, killing hated officers and
sergeants with fragmentation grenades--"fragging"--was
commonplace. Mutinies also occurred.
Over 65,000 soldiers had deserted by 1970. Search and
destroy missions often became "search and avoid."
In an article headed "The Collapse of the Armed Forces,"
written for the Armed Forces Journal in June 1971, Col. Robert
D. Heinl Jr. reported that the "army that now remains in
Vietnam is in a state approaching collapse." He cited
widespread incidents of mutiny, fraggings, and GI organizing
against the war as evidence.
Heinl quoted a U.S. soldier in Cu Chi: "They have set up
separate companies for men who refuse to go into the field.
It's no big thing to refuse to go. If a man is ordered to go to
such and such a place he no longer goes through the hassle of
refusing; he just packs his shirt and goes to visit some
buddies at another base camp.
"Operations have become incredibly ragtag. Many guys don't
even put on their uniforms any more ... . The American garrison
on the larger bases are virtually disarmed. The lifers have
taken our weapons from us and put them under lock and key. ...
There have also been quite a few fragging incidents in the
battalion."
GI resistance was instrumental in ending the war in Vietnam.
Anti-war activists played a key role in supporting GI
resisters. Organizations like the American Servicemen's Union
provided support for GIs who opposed the war.
The ASU published a newspaper for GIs called The Bond. The
name reflected the bond between the anti-war movement and the
brothers and sisters in the military. Establishing that bond
once again is a priority for those interested in bringing the
occupation of Iraq to an end.
Anti-war groups support GI resisters
The Support Network for an Armed Forces Union--SNAFU--is an
organization that supports resistance inside the military.
SNAFU has issued a statement supporting this platoon's refusal
of orders, and is working to provide support for soldiers who
refuse.
According to SNAFU: "These soldiers have been placed in
danger by the policies of the U.S. government that have created
a climate of hatred throughout the Arab and Muslim world. The
illegal war against Iraq, the brutalization of the Palestinian
people, the bombing of civilians in Fallujah and throughout
Iraq, and the torture chambers at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere have
engendered a justifiable outrage throughout the region.
"The Pentagon and the brass have repeatedly demonstrated
their disregard for human life by brutalizing and murdering
Iraqi people, and by their callous disregard for the safety and
well-being of their own troops. Pentagon officials and the
officer corps view front-line troops, drawn largely from poor
and oppressed communities, as expendable, in the same way they
view the Iraqi people as less than human. ... We support the
decision by these soldiers to refuse orders and we call upon
others to also take action to stop the war."
(www.join-snafu.org)
Reprinted from the Oct. 28, 2004, issue of
Workers World newspaper
This article is copyright under a Creative
Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)
HOME
:: U.S. NEWS ::
WORLD NEWS ::
EDITORIALS ::
SUBSCRIBE ::
DONATE
Email
this article
Printable
page