Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

The irrationality of capitalism

Freight backed up but railroad won't hire

By G. Dunkel

In this era of outsourcing and automation, when the drive to reduce the number of workers in the production and distribution of goods has been relentless, even the Wall Street Journal is forced to admit that workers and their skills are essential to the functioning of the economy.

The lead story in the July 22 Journal was headlined, "Woes at Union Pacific Create a Bottleneck for the Economy." UP is the largest railroad in the country, moving about 13 percent of all the freight by volume.

This is not even the peak season for railroads. Grain harvests are not yet ready to move, demand for the coal used in electric generation is low, and goods for the holiday season are just reaching U.S. shores. The Journal says the main problem facing the UP is that the "railroad has found itself without adequate staffing to handle the extra freight" generated by the "unexpected" growth in the U.S. economy.

It is not until the last third of the article that it quotes unnamed spokespeople from the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen and the United Transportation Union as saying "the company's problems stem from not hiring enough conductors and engineers."

Even in an era in which locomotives--at least those in freight yards--can be remote controlled, they need more workers.

According to railroad management, it officially takes at least 14 weeks to train a conductor or a brake person and six months to train an experienced conductor to become an engineer. However, they do acknowledge that it takes much longer to prepare "train and engine employees." Even after taking the training classes, railroad worker Steve Millies told Workers World, the employee needs additional time on the job to "post" jobs and get qualified on the "physical characteristics" of track--memorize the location of signals, speed, restrictions, etc.

The railroad companies themselves admit that it takes five years in most jobs to become fully qualified. So, even if they started hiring today, it would be years before they had a fully qualified workforce.

The Union Pacific started shedding highly qualified workers under the reign of Drew Lewis, who was the company's CEO until 1996. Lewis set the general outlines of UP's employment practices. As Ronald Reagan's secretary of transportation before that, this scab herder broke the PATCO strike of air traffic controllers in 1981.

Labor creates all wealth

UP reduced its work force by 11 percent from 1999 to 2004. Most of its cuts were in its operating staff.

But it's not only UP that has this staffing problem. According to the July 14 St. Louis Dispatch, "Rail employment among the five biggest operators totaled nearly 177,000 in March 1999 and stood at about 147,000 in March 2004, reflecting a 17 percent reduction."

The railroads point to derailments and bridge collapses as another cause of the bottlenecks created in the movement of goods. But certainly if the railroads hired people to maintain tracks and bridges, this source of slowdowns would be at least reduced.

The slowdown on the rails has other effects.

The West Coast docks, especially San Diego and Los Angeles, are also jammed. In Los Angeles, during the week of July 10, 58 ships were unloading, 17 were at anchor waiting for dock space, and 37 ships were expected within a few days.

Part of the congestion comes from the fact that the railroads and the trucking industry--which is having trouble finding drivers--can't clear the containers. The longshore companies want to hire at least 2,000 more workers. But the bosses want to hire "casuals," who get paid $10 to $14 an hour less than enrolled longshore workers. In general, only about 60 casuals a week can be trained.

It is the labor of workers that creates profits. But the instability of the capitalist economy, with its ups and downs, inhibits the bosses from putting on more workers when they need them. If the bosses, in their drive to increase profits and in disdain for planning and the overall economy, cut too many, their decisions have dire consequences. This is what the Journal, a capitalist tool if there ever was one, has documented.

Reprinted from the Aug. 5, 2004, issue of Workers World newspaper
This article is copyrighted under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe to WW by Email: wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Donate to support pro-labor, anti-war news.
HOME | NEWS | SEARCH | SUBSCRIBE | WWP | SUPPORT WW