Mumia Abu-Jamal from death row:
What 'war against terrorism'?
[H]e educated the sons of chieftains in the liberal arts
and gave higher marks to the talents of the Britons than to the
studied skill of the Gauls, with the result that those who
recently rejected the Latin language desired eloquence. Then
too our manner of dress became stylish and there was widespread
use of the toga; and gradually they gave in to the attractions
of vices, porticoes and baths and the elegance of banquets. And
this was called civilization among those who did not know
better, although it was part of slavery.
--Tacitus, "Agricola, Germany and Dialogue
On Orators" (Univ. of Okla. Press, 1967/1991)
It is ever so easy for us to talk about the "war against
terrorism," and accept it as a given, an obvious truth.
Yet it is exceedingly difficult to speak on it, if one has
but an inkling of the history of the United States in its own
regions and neighboring territories for the last century, or
even 50 years.
There, we find a history of U.S.-sanctioned-and-supported
barbarism against people throughout the length and breadth of
Central and South America, who have had to endure (if they
survived!) decades under ruthless generals, monsters who
wreaked unholy havoc upon their people, or rapine, torture,
murder and more in the name of their masters--the
norteamericanos.
For millions of people who live in the countries south of
the Rio Grande, U.S. claims to wage a "war against terrorism"
are dismissed with deep cynicism, if not ill humor. For they
know that the United States has always been the motivating
force behind the sheer terror that has ravaged their societies
since the 1800s.
They know that the United States trained their soldiers not
just in the use of weaponry, but in the techniques of torture,
not to be used against neighboring threats, but against their
own people, on behalf of the landowners, almost all of whom
have themselves sold their souls to the United States.
Indeed, they would *love* a "war against terror," if it
meant that the United States would cease interfering in their
national affairs, stop supporting coups, or stop buying off
sectors of their middle classes.
Several days ago, I was reading a remarkable book: Clara
Nieto's "Masters of War: Latin America and U.S. Aggression"
(N.Y.: Seven Stories Press, 2003). In her work, the former
diplomat and journalist details U.S. intervention into Mexican,
Cuban, Guatemalan, Argentine, Nicara guan, Panamanian,
Uruguayan, Brazilian ... you name it--virtually all Central and
Latin American internal affairs. From the 1823 era of the
Monroe Doctrine to the vicious Reagan years to the Clinton era,
the United States wages war against the forces of democracy in
the region, fueling the forces that have made the United State
the place of immigration for millions. Those people leave their
homes not for democracy, not for freedom, but because they
understand that the United States will rarely do at home what
it does abroad. Here, at least, is a semblance of peace. They
understand that no place, outside of imperial territory, is
safe from the wrath of the Empire.
As for Cuba, its leader was subjected to at least a dozen
U.S. attempts to kill him. The CIA enlisted the help of Mafiosi
like Meyer Lansky, John Roselli and Santo Trafficante in its
assassination attempts against Fidel Castro. In one year
alone--indeed, in eight months--the CIA carried out 5,780 acts
of "sabotage and terrorism" against Cuba and its leaders, with
Mafia help. (Nieto, pp. 78-9)
In the 1980s, Ronald Reagan unleashed a right-wing wave
against the Sandinistas of Nicaragua. As Nieto argues:
"Reagan's 'secret war' against Nicaragua became an
international grab bag. Criminals, terrorists, mercenaries,
paramilitaries, soldiers of fortune, unemployed people of
various nationalities, former Green Berets, Cuban veterans of
the Bay of Pigs, retired military officers, former CIA agents,
Argentine thugs, and Israeli advisers (some 30 in 1983)
participated in one way or another." (p. 341)
These men unleashed an unholy hell on Nicaragua, of
bombings, killings, rapes, torture and widespread murder. All
because they were 'following orders' of the imperial president,
Reagan. Reagan would liken these people, the Contras, to "our
Founding Fathers."
Perhaps he had something, at that.
Reprinted from the June 17, 2004, issue of
Workers World newspaper
This article is copyrighted
under a Creative
Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe to WW by Email: wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Donate to
support pro-labor, anti-war news.
Email
this article
Printable
page