Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

What Workers World said in April 2003

The death of a delusionary doctrine:

Iraqi resistance and the Rumsfeld strategy

The following excerpts are from an article by Fred Goldstein in the April 10, 2003, issue of Workers World newspaper about the false debate regarding the role of U.S. troop strength in the Iraq War.

The most important thing to note about the controversy over the war plan is that it is entirely superficial. The dispute has been reduced to a question of judgment. In fact, it is not merely a question of poor judgment on Rumsfeld's part. It is a question of ideology and world outlook that underlies the disastrous miscalculation.

The Bush administration developed its doctrine of world domination in a National Security Strategy document of September 2002. This is an evolution of the Defense Planning Guidance first promulgated in March 1992, authored by Paul Wolfowitz and approved and later modified by Cheney. It has been brought up to date and couched in language about countering terrorism. But it basically asserts the right of U.S. imperialism to intervene and remove any government that Washington deems a threat. The document further flatly states that no power or combination of powers shall be allowed to challenge the world supremacy of the Pentagon.

Such an outrageously aggressive and delusionary political doctrine, which proclaims the intention of U.S. imperialism to dominate the globe and its population of 6 billion people, must of necessity have an enabling military doctrine that can envision such a world conquest within the means available to U.S. capitalism. ...

The Rumsfeld military doctrine--the supremacy of air power, high technology and threats of "shock and awe"--is a 21st-century version of 19th-century gunboat diplomacy. It harkens back to an era when the masses of the world were as yet isolated from one another, cut off from modern technology, military means, means of communication, and historical experience of struggle and organization. It recalls the era when British gunboats could sail to the coast of China or Africa and fire their cannons--a vastly superior military technology at the time--and devastate a coastal area in order to bring the local rulers into submission. ...

This was the "shock and awe" of the 19th century, which is being resurrected for the 21st century with computer-guided bombs instead of cannon balls.

The fatal flaw in their doctrine

Its two principal and interconnected assumptions are that Washington can get its way by threatening governments into submission or changing "regimes" around the globe so as to establish absolute sovereignty and domination. And that the people of the world are an inert mass--they are mere objects sufficiently disorganized and non-threatening that they do not have to be taken into account as the fundamental factor in world history. All that is needed is to send some smart bombs, cruise missiles, killer helicopters and computerized tanks, and U.S. domination is assured.

This, of course, is a necessary military doctrine for any faction of the ruling class that dreams of establishing a world empire. It means that you don't have to use millions of soldiers to go kill and be killed in massive combat. It means that the role of the infantry and the Marines is to go in and "mop up" after murderous bombardments and then be transitional occupation forces helping to usher in new puppet governments that will do the beck and call of Washington.

It means that the working class here being sent to the wars of conquest will not have to undergo hardships; will not rebel against being used as shock troops for the transnational corporations and the oil companies. It means the ruling class can have "endless war" abroad and social stability at home.

But the Iraqi government, which has become a government of national resistance, and the Iraqi people in every city, town and village, have already proven decisively on the ground that the Rumsfeld strategy, and the Bush doctrine of empire that it is calculated to uphold, are false to the core.

Reprinted from the Oct. 28, 2004, issue of Workers World newspaper

This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)

HOME :: U.S. NEWS :: WORLD NEWS :: EDITORIALS :: SUBSCRIBE :: DONATE