Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

Brown vs. Board of Ed and the mass movement for education

By Minnie Bruce Pratt

On May 17, 1954, the U.S. Supreme Court declared school segregation by "race" to be illegal. The case of Brown vs. the Board of Education was based on the reality of Linda Brown, a Black third grader in Topeka, Kan., who had to walk a mile through a railroad switchyard to get to her elementary school while an elementary school for whites was only seven blocks away from her home.

Linda Brown's circumstances were multiplied hundreds of thousands of times in the lives of other African-Amer ican children, as well as Native American and Latino children.

In Prince Edward County, Va., children went to school in flimsy shacks heated only by oil-drum stoves. Black students had no textbooks, or used hand-me-down, outdated textbooks from the schools for whites. They had little or none of the amenities, like science equipment, of the white schools.

Despite this, African American teachers labored valiantly to transmit their proud history of struggle to the students, who continued the fight. At the Prince Edward schools in 1951, students went on strike for two weeks to protest the terrible conditions.

It was this militant action that led to a Virginia court case that was also part of the Brown decision.

Separate and unequal

The Brown decision overturned an 1896 Reconstruction-era Supreme Court ruling, Plessy vs. Ferguson, that declared segregation legal if there were "equal but separate accommodations" for Black and white people.

The Plessy decision was part of an overall assault by the U.S. ruling class on the "unfinished revolution" under way in the South after the abolition of slavery--the attempt by freed Black people to assert self-determination through economic and political means.

Establishment of a free public school system in the South was one element in this revolution.

In "Black Reconstruction," W.E.B. DuBois wrote: "The first great mass move ment for public education at the expense of the state, in the South," came from freed Black people, not permitted by law to learn to read or write when enslaved. There had been virtually no public schools for anyone in the South, including poor whites. Schools began during the Civil War when Black refugees and soldiers were taught in camps, and continued to the establishment of public schools like those in Charle ston, S.C., open to "all children without distinction of color."

The old slavocracy segregated this embryonic integrated public school system in order to divide the white and newly freed Black working-class.

Defeating Reconstruction in the South, the former slave owners violently forced themselves back into power and passed a series of laws to return freed Black people to de facto bondage. Northern capital joined hands with the Southern ruling class, and the Plessy decision was the codification of this racist strategy at the national level.

Determined resistance

The Brown decision, almost 50 years after Plessy, was a tremendous victory over that racism. The decision came in the middle of a period of intense reaction within the United States. Only a few months after the ruling, a Black schoolchild was lynched.

Emmett Till, a 14-year-old African American visiting from Chicago, was brutally killed and mutilated in Missis sippi. His white murderers used the phony old pretext of alleged sexual advances toward a white woman.

His assailants were acquitted. But the unrelenting determination of his mother, Mamie Till Mobley, brought Emmett Till's case to national attention.

The U.S. Justice Department just announced that it is reopening prosecution of Till's murder, perhaps for some of the same reasons that the Supreme Court ruled for Linda Brown 50 years ago-the need to whitewash "U.S. justice" to a world increasingly skeptical of that idea.

Today the need comes from the horrific racist tortures of Iraqis by U.S. soldiers. The pictures of white soldiers smirking as they stand over tortured Iraqi instantly recall the photographs of smiling whites at lynchings, or Till's murderers laughing in the courtroom during their trial.

In the 1950s, racist repression in the South took the form both of physical violence like that done to Till, and institutional violence such as segregated schools. But African Americans met repression with determined resistance before and after the Brown decision.

This rising militancy, fueled by Black veterans returning from World War II and the Korean War, was strengthened by local organizing. This included the Montgomery bus boycott initiated by African American women in Alabama, and the growing anti-colonial struggles in Asia, Africa, the Middle East and Latin America.

These historic factors of struggle led to the unanimous Supreme Court decision in Brown, even though at least one of the justices, Hugo Black of Alabama, was affiliated with the Ku Klux Klan.

Education for profit

Today, the elementary schools in Linda Brown's hometown of Topeka are fully integrated--and staggering from insufficient funds, particularly in districts with impoverished children of color. Field trips and counseling are cut this year, perhaps nurses and teachers next.

Legal access to public schools regardless of nationality came with Brown, and then came a 50-year struggle to enforce it. But money and support for quality education for children of color did not follow from local, state, and federal governments. In the South many local white-controlled school boards stripped the public schools of books, equipment, and buses to set up segregated whites-only Christian academies.

Activists are waging an intense legal struggle to adequately finance public schools. But a 2002 decision by the Supreme Court in favor of school vouchers will funnel money away from the public education of poor school children, especially children of color, into private schools they cannot afford to attend, even with vouchers.

In the for-profit privatization promoted by the U.S. ruling class, states are attempting to seize control of local schools under the pretext of "low performance," and turn them over to companies whose students perform substantially below standard levels. In Philadelphia, where more than 80 percent of the students are children of color, and 78 percent from low-income households, a move to sell out the city's schools to such a company was met by fierce community opposition and student walkouts.

Education as class struggle

Fifty years after Brown, oppressed communities are fighting not legal but economic barriers to the education of their children. They are also still fighting for their right to self-determination, to choose where and how that education can best occur.

The state exists to protect the interests of the owning capitalist class--and it never concedes without a struggle to any change that would strengthen the working class. The state never allocates without a fight a portion of capitalist profits back to working-class and oppressed people who generate the surplus value in the first place.

Brown was a concession wrung from the state by such fierce, protracted struggle, and at the cost of many lives. The continuing struggle for our children's education is part of the on-going struggle for our class.

Reprinted from the May 27, 2004, issue of Workers World newspaper
This article is copyrighted under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe to WW by Email: wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Donate to support pro-labor, anti-war news.
HOME | NEWS | SEARCH | SUBSCRIBE | WWP | SUPPORT WW