Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

Black farmers demand justice--again

By Monica Moorehead

"Land is the basis of all independence.
Land is the basis of freedom, justice
and equality." --Malcolm X

The struggle of Black farmers to win a semblance of social justice from the U.S. government has not gone away. In fact, it is very much alive.

Five years ago, thousands of African American farmers sued the United States Department of Agriculture, charging decades-long racist discrimination. Another class-action lawsuit, by many of the same farmers against this same USDA and for similar reasons, was filed Sept. 9. Many of these farmers are based in the Black Belt, the land comprising fertile, rich soil in the South.

This latest lawsuit seeks $20.5 billion in damages, and class-action status for upwards of 25,000 Black farmers who grew or tried to grow crops between 1997 and 2004. The lawsuit exposes how the USDA retaliated against many of the farmers who won money from the 1999 lawsuit. The USDA denied them new loans and subsidies, from the time that lawsuit was settled until now.

The Black Farmers and Agriculturalist Association and 11 other plaintiffs filed the lawsuit in Washington, D.C., on behalf of these farmers.

In August, the Environmental Working Group and the National Black Farmers Association released a report denouncing the 1999 settlement because the courts have dismissed the overwhelming majority of these farmers' claims of being systematically denied federal loans to farm.

In other words, the farmers charge the U.S. government with racism.

This report states that out of an estimated 96,000 Black farmers who sought restitution under the 1999 class-action lawsuit, more than 72,000 saw their claims rejected in arbitration. Another 7,800 claims were dropped for failing to meet "filing deadlines."

Many of the farmers have gone on record saying they were not made aware of any USDA deadlines for filing claims.

When the 1999 lawsuit was approved, a judge proclaimed that it would be the largest civil-rights lawsuit in U.S. history, and that $2 billion would be shared by the 96,000 farmers. As of today, less than $815 million has been paid to just a little over 13,000 farmers.

Minus lawyers' fees and other costs, these farmers have received on average about $50,000 or less--a mere drop in the bucket.

"The last thing in the world the African American should be denied is the right to farm--that is the reason we were brought here [slavery--MM]. ... Farming should be an entitlement to Black folk. Our great-grandfathers and great-grandmothers paid for that opportunity," said Thomas Burrell, president of the Black Farmers and Agriculturalist Association. (Associated Press, Sept. 9)

Black farmers staged many sit-ins at local USDA offices in the South in 2001-2002 to bring media attention to their plight.

Fighting extinction

These farmers' struggle is rooted in the legacy of U.S. slavery and Jim Crow racism.

The Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 did not deliver the promise of 40 acres and a mule to the former slaves, but the short-lived radical Reconstruction period did breathe some life into Black farming.

There was an increase in land ownership. African Americans owned 3 million acres by 1875, 8 million in 1890 and 12 million in 1900.

By 1910, African American farmers owned an estimated 15 million acres, with 175,000 farms fully owned, 43,000 partially owned and 670,000 sharecropped.(foodfirst.org)

Black ownership of the land continued to thrive even under semi-enslaved conditions after the Great Compromise of 1877. This act instructed Northern troops to leave former slaves unprotected from former slave masters, which undermined the struggle for full social equality for Black people in the South.

Sharecropping was the U.S. version of feudalism. Black farmers were treated like serfs or tenants. In essence, the white landowners leased them a small plot of land to grow food. A smaller portion of this food was for subsistence for themselves and their families. The larger portion of the crops went to the white landowners, who sold the food on the market to make a profit.

According to foodfirst.org: "In 1920, 925,000 farmers (14 percent of all farms) were African American. By 1950, Black land ownership had declined to 12 million acres, and in 1969 it was down to 5.5 million acres, a drop of 54 percent in just 20 years.

"Between 1982 and 1992, the number of Black farmers in the United States dropped by 43 percent, from 33,250 to 18,816.14. A 1990 House Committee report said Black farmers were on the verge of extinction.

"At that time, African Americans made up roughly 1 percent of the nation's farmers and were disappearing at a rate almost five times greater than whites. The African American farm owners who still survive are bucking a dismal trend.

"In 1999, less than 18,000 African American farmers, out of a total 1.9 million U.S. farmers, owned less than 1 million acres. It was then predicted that by the year 2000, there would be no Black-owned land in America."

The answer is solidarity

Historically, white farmers have been pitted against farmers of color by succumbing to a more privileged status. White farmers have not been victimized by the banks' racist loan policies as have Black farmers and other farmers of color in disproportionate numbers. The banks and the U.S. government rely on racism to divide the farmers in order to keep the profits flowing into their coffers.

Consider these startling statistics--91.4 percent of 1997 farm loans went to white farmers, 2.3 percent to Black farmers, 4.2 percent to Latino farmers, and 1.2 percent to Native Americans. (Farmers Home Administration)

Getting a loan from a bank is the only way a farmer can buy expensive earth-moving equipment, seed and much more that is needed in order to plant and sustain crops.

In 2003, the revolutionary Cuban government signed an agreement to buy crops from some of the Black farmers in the United States with the assistance of the NAACP. The Cubans did this to expose the fact that crops grown by Black farmers were being excluded from the worldwide capitalist market.

The emergence of imperialist agri business on a global scale has helped to impoverish peasants and farm workers around the world, and to accelerate the demise of the livelihood of hundreds of thousands of farmers of all nationalities in the United States due to capitalist restructuring. White farmers' privileged position is fading more and more as foreclosures and seizures of farmers' land by agribusiness intensifies.

It would be in the interests of white farmers to show concrete support for this current lawsuit against the USDA initiated by Black farmers. It is this kind of anti-racist class solidarity that would shake the very foundations of the agribusiness bosses and the U.S. government.

Reprinted from the Sept. 23, 2004, issue of Workers World newspaper

This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)

HOME :: U.S. NEWS :: WORLD NEWS :: EDITORIALS :: SUBSCRIBE :: DONATE