Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

Bush lied about 9/11 pollutants

Millions exposed to lethal plume

By Heather Cottin

The Bush administration instructed the Environmental Protection Agency to lie about air pollution in New York after the World Trade Center burned up in September 2001. The White House coordinated its effort with the National Security Council and the EPA on behalf of the capital of finance capitalism: Wall Street.

According to a report by the EPA's inspec tor general's office just released--almost two years after the Twin Towers dis integrated into a trillion toxic particles--the White House instructed the EPA to give "misleading information."

The Long Island daily Newsday reported Aug. 23 that "some of the [EPA] press releases were softened before being released to the public, reassuring information was added and cautionary information deleted."

"Softened" is a euphemism. All statements had to be cleared by the National Security Council of the White House.

On Sept. 16, 2001, EPA chief Christine Todd Whitman issued a statement saying it was "safe for New Yorkers to go back to work in New York's Financial District." But it was not safe.

The asbestos level was in some cases 10 times the acceptable levels. As early as January 2002, reports on asbestos indicated that the increased danger in "homes or offices that have not been properly decontaminated could be as high as one additional cancer death for every 10 people exposed." (St. Louis Post Dispatch, Jan. 14, 2002)

A vermiculite mine in Libby, Mont., supplied some of the asbestos used in the World Trade Center. Most of the people in Libby are now dying of asbestos-related diseases. The W.T. Grace Company made its money and then closed down the mine.

Cate Jenkins, an EPA senior chemist who measured the levels of asbestos in Libby, noted the World Trade Center connection in early 2002. She asked, "Why are government agencies just shrugging off the fact that many of the apartments and businesses in lower Manhattan have identical levels of asbestos or higher?"

Les Skramstad, a miner from Libby, also saw what was happening back then. "It's the same damned government babble and indecision that led to half this town being either dead or dying from asbestos. ... Twenty or 30 years from now, when those New Yorkers start falling over dead, some young government bureaucrat will get all choked up apologizing for what the EPA and others didn't do." (St. Louis Post Dispatch, Jan. 13, 2002)

What the government did do was distort, cajole and cover up.

Lethal levels of lead and asbestos were in the air. Scientists were alarmed at the deadly cocktail of inhalable particles, toxic metals, asbestos and byproducts of burning plastic. Yet the EPA directed businesses to open up, saying, "The general public should be very reassured by initial sampling."

The plume of debris that blew over Man hattan, Brooklyn and Queens was called "no significant health hazard," by the EPA. But there was in fact no basis for saying this. The EPA had not tested for very fine particles of substances like asbestos.

In November 2001 Dr. Tom Cahill, professor of applied science and atmospheric sciences at the University of California Davis, suspected the presence of the ultrafine particles, considered to be more dangerous to human health than large particles.(New York Times, Feb. 24, 2002)

But the EPA did what it was told. The government got the financial district up and running again, while the millions who inhaled the air and those with deadly dust in their homes, schools and businesses were kept in the dark.

Undoubtedly, those who worked at Ground Zero and the many members of cleaning crews will be the most affected. These workers often immigrants paid the minimum wage and given little or no safety equipment, cleaned polluted office and residential space after the disaster.

Sen. Charles Schumer endorsed the coverup, calling it "understandable. ... If the public loses faith that things are safe when the government says so, we'll have done more damage. ..." For Schumer and for the White House, people's lives are secondary. For them, damage control means saving Wall Street and the liars in Washington.

Reprinted from the Sept. 4, 2003, issue of Workers World newspaper

This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)

HOME :: U.S. NEWS :: WORLD NEWS :: EDITORIALS :: SUBSCRIBE :: DONATE