Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

Anti-war protests follow Bush around the world

By Leslie Feinberg

Like a traveling salesman, Commander-in-Chief George Bush has been on the road, hawking the U.S. "war on terror" like snake oil. It's a tough sell.

As Bush jetted to five countries in Southeast Asia and to Australia in seven days Oct. 17-23, angry demonstrations filled the streets wherever Air Force One touched down.

Thousands of workers protested in Manila when Bush arrived for an lightning eight-hour state visit on Oct. 18, widely seen as a reward to President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo for sending soldiers and police to beef up U.S.-led forces in Iraq. Demonstrators converged on Congress where Bush was addressing the Joint Houses of legislature and other sites in the capital.

Nationally coordinated protests also took place in Baguio, Cordillera, Ilocos, Central Luzon, Cebu, Iloilo-Panay, Samar, Leyte, Negros, Davao, Cotabato, Agusan Provinces, Cagayan de Oro and other major urban centers and provinces. More anti-war protests were scheduled for Oct. 25.

The Kilusang Mayo Uno (KMU)--one of the biggest union federations in the Philippines--issued a statement stressing that the policies of Bush and Arroyo have "brought serious setbacks in the economies of both countries. High unemployment and massive retrenchment caused widespread industrial unrest among workers and labor unions. Poor people and other patriotic and peace-loving sectors continue to protest over the unjust war launched by Bush and supported by Arroyo. We declare them enemies of the working class."

KMU Secretary General Joel Mag lunsod castigated the police blockades and use of force against protesters. He concluded, "Bush wants to impose what he failed to achieve during the World Trade Organization Conference in Can cun, which is to forge 'free trade agreements' with Asian states. We urge peoples all over Asia to frustrate the U.S. economic and military agenda in the region."

The Bagong Alyansang Makabayan-BAYAN--the militant Philippine anti-imperialist movement, reported on demonstrations in other parts of Asia during Bush's seven-day trip.

Anti-imperialist and anti-war groups in Japan held nationwide mass actions on Oct. 17 to demand an end to the Pentagon occupation of Iraq and to protest the Koizumi government's deployment of Japanese troops there.

In Thailand, the Workers' Democracy, a coalition united against the U.S. occupation of Iraq, organized demonstrations against its government sending 1,000 Thai soldiers to Iraq. Organizers explained that the march from the World Trade Center in Bangkok to the Siam Center retraced the route of the historic 1975 protest demanding the dismantling of U.S. military bases there.

And mass anti-war sentiment in Britain and Australia have reached such critical mass that the Connecticut Cowboy faced embarrassing rebuffs from the political establishments of these two main imperialist allies.

Bush can run, but he can't hide

The Canberra, Australia, visit was the last leg of Bush's six-nation jaunt. The Australian government has contributed troops and military hardware to the imperialist military assault on Afghanistan and Iraq and backed Washington's war drive politically in the United Nations.

Right-wing Australian Prime Minister John Howard, a servile ally of Wash ing ton, welcomed Bush with open arms and an invitation to address a joint sitting of parliament's two legislative houses.

Outside Parliament House on Oct. 23, a massive security apparatus skirmished with thousands of anti-war protesters. Activists pressed against police barricades as Bush's motorcade screeched up to the entrance, banging drums and chanting "George Bush go home and take Howard with you!"

Later, near the U.S. Embassy, anti-war activists broke though the police barriers. After being pushed back by the mass of police force, demonstrators marched to Howard's official residence, where the Australian leader was hosting a lunch for the U.S. president. Others stood up to security forces and their attack dogs outside the U.S. Embassy compound where Bush spent the night. (CNN.com, Oct. 23)

A day earlier, an estimated 7,000 to 10,000 activists marched against Bush in Sydney.

This popular anger was reflected inside parliament. As Bush tried to defend the Pentagon-led aggression against Afghan istan and Iraq. Two Green Party Senators, Bob Brown and Kerry Nettle, disrupted and heckled the U.S. head of state, challenging him on the war drive and denounced the "free trade" agreement that Bush and Howard are reportedly negotiating in secret. They also demanded the return of two Australian nationals--Mamdouh Habib and David Hicks--held at the U.S. naval base at Guantánamo, Cuba, called on Bush to respect international law.

So hot is the breath of widespread anger on Howard's neck regarding these brutal and illegal internments, that the prime minister reportedly told Bush during their 40-minute private discussion, "It probably suits everybody that their fates be worked out sooner rather than later.

Together with hundreds of other "suspects," Habib and Hicks have been caged in Guantánamo without charges for two years and "both face U.S. military trails with limited access to legal advice, their families and lawyers have said." (AP, Oct. 23) Habib's wife and 18-year-old son Ahmed, and Hicks lawyer were in the parliament public gallery. Ahmed was ejected after standing and calling out to Bush: "What about my Dad's rights?"

Both Senators resisted being removed by the sergeant at arms after the speaker of the House ordered them ousted from the chamber.

Some 13 Labor legislators, mostly women, sat silently, refusing to rise for a standing ovation at the end of the speech. Earlier, 41 opposition lawmakers had signed a letter criticizing the Bush-led war drive, "saying that a clear and present danger in Iraq did not exist." According to the Oct. 27 Business Day, Labor Party leader Simon Crean had ordered them all to behave during Bush's speech.

Had CNN not defied the Australian government's orders not to film inside the chamber, viewers around the world would not have seen a close-up of Bush's face twitch or the scuffling as Howard and loyal politicians formed a jostling cordon to help the U.S. president make a quick exit. Nettle tried to hand Bush some papers, but he refused to take them.

No pomp due to circumstance

At this point, Bush desperately needs a good photo opportunity. His senior aides thought it would be jolly if the sovereign ruler of the U.S. rode together with the Queen of England in a triumphal procession along London's Mall during the president's Nov. 19-21 state visit.

The regal procession is traditionally the high point of public pageantry when a head of state visits. And meticulous plans were already in the works.

Smiling crowds waving flags on sticks, cheering "bully for Bush!" Unfortunately these best-laid plans went astray because so many people in England think of Bush as just that: a bully.

So the British government had to deliver an unpleasant message to the Oval Office. After consultations with the House of Windsor and Scotland Yard, a senior Palace official announced Oct. 18, "Downing Street, anxious about possible anti-war protests from the start, has now decided to pull the plug on it.

"We are liaising with the White House and they have made no attempt to hide their disappointment," he concluded.

Instead, Bush will be whisked around by helicopter, "to avoid protesters who line road routes," noted the Oct. 19 Sunday Telegraph.

And, the article continued, a prestigious invit ation to deliver a speech to the British Parliament has been withdrawn. "Other proposed events have also been curtailed or cancelled, and he will not address Parliament because of fears of a boycott by MPs."

Instead, King George and the Queen of England will be photographed sipping tea inside Buckingham Palace, choreographed and under guard. The message these staged snapshots will deliver to all those outside the fortressed walls is "Let them eat cake."

Marie Antoinette was a "neo"-con, too.

Reprinted from the Nov. 6, 2003, issue of Workers World newspaper

This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)

HOME :: U.S. NEWS :: WORLD NEWS :: EDITORIALS :: SUBSCRIBE :: DONATE