Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

African leaders tell U.S. & Britain

'End sanctions on Zimbabwe!'

By Heather Cottin

The leaders of the 14 countries of the Southern African Development Community, meeting in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, have condemned sanctions against Zimbabwe. President Benjamin Mkapa of Tanzania, current chair of the SADC, said, "Those sanctions should now be lifted."

In 2000, just when southern Africa was suffering from a serious drought, the U.S. and the European Union instituted economic sanctions on Zimbabwe. It was already reeling from the AIDS crisis, which affects 25 percent of its population.

Sanctions are war without guns and bloodshed that targets "children, the elderly and the chronically ill," wrote former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark. He was commenting on sanctions on Iraq, but the same is true in Africa.

In the mid-1990s, former members of the revolutionary armies that had won Zimbabwe's independence in 1979 spearheaded a resistance movement to win back the land, which remained largely in the hands of the white ruling class and multinational corporations.

The British-brokered Lancaster House Accords ending the guerrilla war had prevented the African people from expropriating white-owned land for 10 years after independence, keeping the white farmers rich and the Black Zimbabweans poor.

Some 4,500 whites owned 95 percent of Zimbabwe's most fertile soil while millions of African farmers were landless. When President Robert Mugabe supported the redistribution of land, the imperialist countries launched a destabilization campaign as vicious as those which have targeted Yugoslavia, Iraq and Cuba.

One British conservative characterized the Mugabe government as a "racist and fascistic regime." Britain is the former colonial power in Zimbabwe, which used to be called Rhodesia after the British magnate Cecil Rhodes.

President Mugabe's support of the landless veterans' demand for land provoked the imperialist countries, especially the U.S. and Britain, to launch a propaganda campaign against him at the same time that they instituted the killer sanctions.

Britain and the U.S. then began pressuring the leaders of Mozambique, Namibia and South Africa "to prevail on Mr. Mugabe to ... end the wave of farm invasions and violence." (The Times of London, April 22, 2000) After a recent meeting with George W. Bush, South African President Thabo Mbeki said he and the U.S. president were "of one mind about the urgent need to address the political and economic challenges of Zimba bwe." In a July 10 article in the British newspaper The Guardian, this was slanted as "Bush backs Mbeki on Zimbabwe."

But Mbeki did not come out against the land redistribution program in Zimba bwe. The Black people in southern Africa strongly oppose the still-existing and iniquitous property relations that continue to impov erish them while enriching white farmers and transnational agribusinesses.

They also know that the imperialists are always defaming their leaders. In fact, for decades, even after he had received the Nobel Peace Prize for his struggle against apartheid, Nelson Mandela was on a U.S. government list of international "terrorists."The U.S. government only recently agreed to remove the 85-year-old Mandela and two other former leaders of the African National Congress from the list. (Charlene Smith, "The Independent Online," Aug. 10)

Mugabe received a "rapturous welcome" from the populace at the SADC summit in Dar es Salaam, according to BBC News, and enthusiastic support from South African President Mbeki. This shook up the imperialists.

In a defiant speech, which was the conference highlight, Tanzanian President Mkapa upheld the inalienable right of the Zimbabwean people to recover their land. He said, "I find it insulting that there are powers and people who believe food shortages in the region can only be averted when Africans become servants on white people's-owned land, rather than when they work on their own land."

Reprinted from the Sept. 11, 2003, issue of Workers World newspaper

This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)

HOME :: U.S. NEWS :: WORLD NEWS :: EDITORIALS :: SUBSCRIBE :: DONATE