Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

No new taxes for rich New Yorkers

Billionaire mayor tells poor to tighten belts

By Greg Butterfield
New York

Most media coverage of New York's new mayor, Michael Bloomberg, has focused on his policy of "openness." True, it's a sharp contrast to the stance of former mayor and fellow Republican Rudolph Giuliani who shut out Black and Latino politicians, labor unions and community leaders from City Hall for eight years.

But Bloomberg's first "State of the City" address Jan. 30--and his budget proposal to be released Feb. 13--are potent reminders that City Hall's agenda is still to rob from the poor and the working class, and give to the rich.

Bloomberg said New York faced a budget deficit of $4 billion in the coming year. On Feb. 8, City Hall raised that estimate to $4.5 billion.

Part of the deficit has to do with the recession and the disruption caused by the 9/11 disaster. Another big chunk--unmentioned in polite City Hall circles--comes from Giuliani's generous tax breaks and incentives to big business.

To close the gap, Bloomberg told heads of city agencies to plan for budget cuts of at least 20 percent. The only exceptions were the fire department, city schools--and the New York Police Department, which can continue to hire more cops.

Bloomberg said the workforce employed by the city--250,000, down about 50,000 from a decade ago--is too big. He was careful not to mention layoffs. Earlier he said most job cuts would come through attrition.

Many city workers remember that Giuliani said the same thing before ramming through big layoffs and forced "buyouts" in the mid-1990s.

In early January the mayor told "The Today Show" he was considering "adjusting pensions" of city workers. That means withholding workers' salaries for a week or more and paying it when they retire.

Lee Saunders, administrator of the largest municipal workers' union, District Council 37, said he was "troubled" by Bloomberg's remarks. (New York Times, Jan. 31)

Poor told to 'sacrifice'

All of the belt-tightening rhetoric was cloaked in post-Sept. 11 garb. New York must pull together. Everyone must sacrifice.

But one group is exempt from pulling the belt tighter. Bloomberg ruled out raising taxes on big corporations and their wealthy owners, who prospered during the 1990s Wall Street boom and will be the main beneficiaries of the $20-billion federal aid package promised by George W. Bush.

Bloomberg himself is a billionaire, and owns 72 percent of the privately held Bloomberg LLC media company. He spent $75 million to win last year's mayoral election.

More than 100,000 New Yorkers lost their jobs during the last four months of 2001. But the layoffs didn't start with 9/11. Like the rest of the country, New York started to feel the pinch of the capitalist recession early last year.

Some 38,000 New Yorkers lost their welfare benefits on Nov. 30, 2001, as the federal five-year lifetime limit kicked in. Nearly 14,000 more will lose their benefits at the end of February.

In December the New York Times reported that 1 million people in the metropolitan area now rely on food banks and charities on a regular basis just to eat.

Thousands of workfare workers have toiled in the city's so-called Work Experience Program. City officials promised they would be first in line for real city jobs that opened up: a real paycheck, benefits, a union.

These New Yorkers, and the millions who are just one or two paychecks away from their predicament, are the ones Bloomberg is asking to "sacrifice."

Attack on public schools

Bloomberg spent much of his "State of the City" talk attacking the public school system.

He repeated Giuliani's demand that the city's 32 local, elected school boards be abolished and the Board of Education put directly under the mayor's control. The mayor already selects the schools chancellor and appoints some board members. Bloomberg needs the state government's approval to abolish the current system.

The teachers' union and parent/community groups recognized long ago that this scheme had more to do with encouraging privatization than with improving schools. It would mean surrendering important gains won by the Black and Latino communities in the 1960s to have a say in running the schools.

These groups say the city schools' big gest problem is gross underfunding compared with upstate, suburban and predominately white schools.

New York City teachers are currently negotiating for a contract. Gov. George Pataki, who is running for re-election this year and hopes to win the union's backing, offered to sell $204 million worth of state bonds to give teachers a raise. Bloomberg has all but rejected the idea--indicating he plans to continue Giuliani's fight to break the union. (New York Times, Jan. 25)

"No parent has ever come up to me and said, 'I want you make sure that the mayor is in charge of the public school system," said Bill Perkins, a City Council member from Harlem. (Newsday, Jan. 31)

On Jan. 31, 15 City Council members responded to Bloomberg's speech by pointing out modest measures that could help close the budget gap without draconian budget cuts.

According to their "Common Sense Economic Stimulus Plan," the city has access to at least $769 million in unspent state and federal money, the City Limits Weekly Web site reported.

They also suggested helping the poorest city residents apply for state and federal assistance they are eligible for, like food stamps. Under Giuliani, official policy was to discourage potential recipients from applying for any kind of help.

Reprinted from the Feb. 21, 2002, issue of Workers World newspaper

This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)

HOME :: U.S. NEWS :: WORLD NEWS :: EDITORIALS :: SUBSCRIBE :: DONATE