Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

Lenin's message to today's workers


By Milt Neidenberg

Retired Teamster

No matter how much the Bush administration and its loyal opposition, the Democratic Party, whip up the war frenzy against Iraq and the "war on terrorism" in the name of national security, it is the economy that is preoccupying the workers and the oppressed.

We need a strategy to turn around the "war on terrorism" into a war on poverty--and the issue of "national security" into job security.

Labor columnist Steven Greenhouse conducted an important interview in the Sept. 6 New York Times with David J. Olson. It illustrates the potential power labor can wield.

Olson is a professor, a founder of the Harry Bridges Center for Labor Studies, and a consultant on ports and the longshore union. Bridges was founder of the International Longshore Workers Union and leader of the historic 1934 San Francisco general strike.

Greenhouse asked Olson what the impact on the economy would be if the longshore workers, who unload container boxes from ships, conducted a short work stoppage.

Olson answered, "It would severely affect those companies that depend on just-in-time inventory ... the whole gamut of merchandisers [from] Wal-Mart to Sears, to name a few."

Olson stressed, "The container box is the warehouse for modern-day business. ... The ports handle millions of parts needed for assembly or manufacture. ... We're not talking about goods flowing into the country, but also goods flowing out of the country."

Picture ships from abroad landing on these shores filled with containers. The containers are unloaded by dockworkers, picked up and transported inland by trucks, railway and airlines to their destinations, where the commodities are unloaded. Then visualize the reverse: commodities being exported from these shores.

Any disruption in this interconnected process spells disaster for the employers. More than $300 billion worth passes through the West Coast ports--7 percent of the entire gross domestic product.

Now comes the introduction of a higher stage of technology into the mix. It ranges from satellites to hand computers and inter-modal shipments to increase productivity and speed-up. Inter-modal means moving commodities by a combination of road and rail.

In one swoop, the technology brings together a global industrial workforce that includes service workers who plot and record the movement of commodities. Marxists call this the socialization of labor.

Some 10,500 longshore workers acting in unity can unleash this power. It points up just how vulnerable the capitalist economy is to the power of labor, which threatens U.S. imperialist and globalization objectives. It's also important to note that the longshore workers are very multinational and have close ties to their communities.

Of course, the Bush administration would intervene in any way it could to immediately remove this threat to the stability of the capitalist system and its plans to dominate the globe.

However, the threat of severe cutbacks in the living conditions of the workers and the oppressed nationalities will elevate the class struggle to another level.

There are huge hurdles to overcome, not the least of which is the labor bureaucrats, with their political ties to the Democratic Party, their defense of the capitalist system and their hope for its reform. Nevertheless, they are not the fundamental class enemy. The leadership is divided on many issues and tactics over how to deal with the crisis of imperialist war, recession, repression and racism, and the anti-union assault.

It will be significantly easier to reach the rank and file than it was in earlier periods during and since the Cold War. If the government drags the reluctant workers and oppressed into a war against Iraq, it will speed up their class awakening.

Lenin offered today's workers an important lesson about the transition to a period of a revolutionary perspective.

He wrote an essay entitled "On Strikes" in 1899, when Russia suffered both repression and war. He began by discussing the importance of the strike weapon:

"Every strike strengthens and develops in the workers the understanding that the government is their enemy and that the working class must prepare itself to struggle against the government for the people's rights," he said. He called a strike "a school of war."

He talked about wider and broader forms of struggle that develop a revolutionary political perspective. "[We] look forward to the time when all class conscious workers would become socialists [and] will build a party that struggles for the emancipation of the people as a whole ... from the yoke of capital."

He ended his essay with a call that still rings with urgency today: Workers and oppressed of the world, unite!

The enemy that U.S. workers face today is not in Baghdad. It is in Washington and Wall Street, which rip off the wealth and resources created by the multinational labor of the workers and the oppressed.

Reprinted from the Oct. 3, 2002, issue of Workers World newspaper
This article is copyrighted under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe to WW by Email: wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Donate to support pro-labor, anti-war news.
HOME | NEWS | SEARCH | SUBSCRIBE | WWP | SUPPORT WW