Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

Laid-off and dying

Steel workers need a new strategy

By Martha Grevatt
Cleveland

Every day, in addition to formal obituaries, the Cleveland daily newspaper lists everyone who recently died. A few words identify the deceased, perhaps as a member of a church or a worker at a certain company.

This year has seen a marked increase in deaths of workers or retirees from LTV Steel.

Because of bankruptcy proceedings, on Feb. 28 LTV retirees lost their health insurance. Laid-off workers lost supplementary unemployment benefits and health insurance. Salaried employees were left out in the cold completely, without a penny in the severance pay promised them.

However, the bankruptcy court approved millions of dollars in "retention bonuses" to the top executives who shut the mills down. The workers' families drew little comfort from the announcement, also made Feb. 28, that a buyer had been found for the mills, which were idled last year.

Officials of the Steelworkers union are pleased that the new owners, the New York investment firm of W. L. Ross, will reopen the mills and recognize the union. It is surely good news that steel making will continue in Cleveland.

However, the new bosses will not be bound by the previous contract, and will surely demand even more concessions on top of those the union has already made to LTV. Even more significant, they will recall at most 3,000 of the 7,500 workers who lost their jobs. Whether these recalls will respect seniority rights remains to be seen.

The Steelworkers leadership focused on sweetening the pie for a potential buyer by dropping a successor clause that would have required the new owners to recognize the union and abide by the existing contract. The union leaders credit their threat to strike with pushing LTV to extend benefits to laid-off workers and retirees.

Ironically, it is the non-represented salaried workers who have organized to demand a better deal. These former salespeople, supervisors and others who were not unionized have held rallies and filed a lawsuit against the company, stating that they should be considered a secured creditor in the bankruptcy proceedings.

In fact, the union, whose members are owed billions in pension funds, should have been recognized all along as the largest creditor, bigger than all the vendors and bankers to whom LTV was indebted. Instead, the union leaders negotiated as subordinates to these corporate creditors.

If the salaried workers can demand recognition as creditors, why not the union and the workers it represents? As creditors, and thus de facto owners prior to the sale, they could demand all the proceeds of the sale go to rehiring the workers and restoring health benefits to retirees.

The steelworkers recently mobilized large numbers of members and supporters to go to demonstrate in Washington, D.C. Huge ads in the local papers appealed to area workers to help "save our steel." President George W. Bush then agreed to impose large tariffs on some imported steel.

While the steel companies and unions alike welcomed this step, it will not solve the worldwide crisis of capitalist overproduction in steel and manufacturing. Setting off an international trade war does not create jobs. In fact, steel buyers are using the higher price of steel as an excuse to lay off workers in their industries.

The other key demand of the Washington demonstration was that the federal government use the funds from increased tariffs to restore and secure benefits for retired steelworkers. This demand was denied.

With over 30 U.S. steel companies now in bankruptcy, the Steelworkers union has a crisis far bigger than LTV. It is not too late to mount a militant strategy to control the future of these mills and the tens of thousands of jobs they represent. Failure to do so will only lead to more layoffs, more loss of benefits, and far too many early deaths of stress-filled workers.

Reprinted from the March 21, 2002, issue of Workers World newspaper

This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)

HOME :: U.S. NEWS :: WORLD NEWS :: EDITORIALS :: SUBSCRIBE :: DONATE