Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

Good news in hard times

Lesbian, gay, bi, trans movement wins

By Leslie Feinberg

The lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans movement, through its dynamism and tenacity, is continuing to score gains in the U.S. and around the globe. And these hard-won victories taste even sweeter and inspire greater valor at a time when capitalist democracy is slipping the velvet glove off its iron fist.

In the early 1960s in this country, less than a decade before the birth of the modern l/g/b/t mass movement in the heat of a 1969 rebellion against police repression, all 50 states had some form of "sodomy" legislation--anti-gay laws that criminalize oral and anal sex.

Since a recent legal victory in Arkansas struck down that state's statute, only three remaining states now have anti-gay laws on their books targeting sexual relations between consenting same-sex adults. Nine others technically criminalize anal and oral sex for both gay or straight consenting adults: Alabama, Florida, Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Utah and Virginia.

Although police seldom break down people's bedroom doors to enforce these bigoted decrees, they are sometimes used to back up police sting operations in "solicitation" arrests of gay men. In Texas, Georgia and Florida the laws have been used to bar gay applicants from state jobs. And they have bolstered the denial of custody and visitation rights to lesbian and gay parents in North Carolina and Virginia.

The Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund won the Arkansas decision on July 5 after a court fight. Lambda had filed a lawsuit in 1998 on behalf of seven gay residents of the state. None of them had been prosecuted under the law. But each of them courageously declared in public that they have engaged in "illegal" sexual activity in private and will continue to do so.

On that basis, they argued, the sword of prosecution hung over their heads and left them in danger of stigmatization and discrimination as well.

Justice Annabelle Clinton Imber agreed, saying that as long as the law remained on the books the defendants were stigmatized as criminals and could suffer discrimination by the state in such areas as employment and parental rights.

The 5 to 2 ruling by the Arkansas State Supreme Court threw out the draconian law based on two provisions of the state's constitution: protection of individual privacy and the guarantee of equal protection of the laws.

Now all attention turns to the last states to retain these reactionary statutes. The last three with spelled out anti-gay laws are Kansas, Oklahoma and--surprise, surprise--Bush's home-on-the-range state of Texas.

Lambda is vowing to take the Lone Star state's "Homosexual Conduct Law" to the U.S. Supreme Court. After a widely publicized case of two Houston men who were arrested for having sex in one of their homes, the state's "sodomy" law was upheld by a state court of appeals in a ruling that the State Supreme Court declined to reverse.

Lest anyone put their faith in the nine robed justices that make up the Court of Last Resort, it's worth recalling that in 1986, the Supremes upheld Georgia's sodomy law in the notorious Bowers v. Hardwick decision.

However, the l/g/b/t movement has defeated the Georgia law since then. And the Supreme Court would do well to remember that the rotten 1986 ruling sparked militant street protests and mass civil disobedience.

CANADA: Same-sex marriage clears another hurdle

Denial of the right of same-sex couples to marry violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, a three-judge panel of the Ontario Superior Court ruled unanimously on July 12.

The Supreme Court of Canada had already interpreted the Charter to mean that anti-gay discrimination by the government violated the letter of that law. The Canadian Charter spells out the rights to equal protection and benefits, barring discrimination on the basis of race, national or ethnic origin, religion, sex, age and disability.

Several years ago the Supreme Court ruled that discrimination based on "sexual orientation" violates the spirit of the Charter.

The July 12 decision is a victory for the plaintiffs, who took their case to the Ontario Supreme Court, and for the national l/g/b/t organization EGALE, which backed them with an amicus brief.

Several of the plaintiffs immediately turned up at Toronto City Hall demanding marriage licenses, but were told the documents wouldn't be issued until officials could be apprised by their legal counsel.

The Ontario ruling flew in the face of a decision by a single justice of the British Columbia Supreme Court last October, now on appeal in that province's court of appeals.

And a decision on same-sex marriage is also anticipated in the near future from a Quebec court. Quebec officials, awaiting the ruling, agreed to a new law in June that recognizes same-sex unions and bestows equal parental rights on same-sex couples.

These three cases, spanning three provinces, make it likely that the question will soon make its way up to the Supreme Court of Canada.

BRITAIN: Transsexual wins right to marry

In a momentous victory for the legal rights of transsexual women and men, the European Court of Human Rights ruled on July 11 that Britain violates two articles of the European Convention on Human Rights in its treatment of transsexuals. The Court ordered the British government to issue new birth certificates to transsexuals and to allow them to marry.

The decision resulted from two cases filed by transsexual women with the court in 1994 and 1995. Christine Goodwin, a 65-year-old bus driver, filed one; the other was anonymous.

Britain is one of four countries in the Council of Europe that refuses to recognize the legal validity of sex change.

While the decision does not automatically supersede British law, it sets a stunning legal precedent. Goodwin's attorney, Robin Lewis, said the ruling would mean that the British government would eventually be forced to change its laws.

Lewis concluded, "Christine Goodwin's victory will be seen as a milestone on the road to change."

Reprinted from the Aug. 1, 2002, issue of Workers World newspaper

This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)

HOME :: U.S. NEWS :: WORLD NEWS :: EDITORIALS :: SUBSCRIBE :: DONATE