Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

Californai schemin'

Enron scandal still deepening

By Scott Scheffer
Los Angeles

Recently released memos reveal that bosses at Enron Energy Services carried out elaborate schemes that bilked California consumers of at least $30 billion.

It occurred during months when California and several neighboring states were suffering the devastating effects of an acute energy crisis.

When the dust from this scandal finally settles, what many already suspected will be confirmed: The crisis did not stem from a shortage of energy supply or a lack of capacity to transmit sufficient power. Instead it was manufactured by thieving energy billionaires.

How many other energy trading companies and power producers employed similar tactics is not yet known. But it's already clear that this is a capitalist swindle of historic magnitude.

Other energy firms that dominate California's market--like Mirant, Dynergy, Calpine, and Williams--are falling all over themselves to proclaim innocence. But Enron attorney Robert Bennett asserts that the shorthand names used to describe the schemes were known throughout the industry, implying that others took part.

The memos detail strategies with catchy names like Fat Boy, Death Star, Get Shorty and Ricochet. Fat Boy was the name for buying in energy-strapped California--where price caps prevented the selling price from going above $250 per megawatt--and then reselling in neighboring states for as much as $1,200 per megawatt.

One of the memos recording a discussion about the legal risks concludes that it's safe: "This strategy appears not to present any problems, other than a public-relations risk from the fact that such exports may have contributed to California's declaration of a Stage 2 emergency yesterday."

Death Star was how traders labeled the practice of scheduling power transmission that didn't really exist. The purpose was to create fake congestion in some areas of California's power grid. Then they scheduled power transmission in the opposite direction.

As a result they were paid a premium for relieving congestion by Cal-ISO, the independent agency that operates the grid.

According to a memo dated Dec. 6, "No energy, however, is actually put onto the grid in either direction."

Similarly, "Ricochet" meant creating fake congestion as a justification for buying more expensive power out of state, then reselling it in California above the price cap of $250 per megawatt.

During times of high congestion, Cal-ISO would also pay a premium to traders who reduced their load. So another tactic was to simply overstate the amount of power scheduled and collect payment for a reduction that never really occurred.

The agency had no way of detecting how much power was really scheduled to begin with. For "reducing congestion," Cal-ISO paid the traders $750 per megawatt.

Too big to sweep under the rug

The Enron bosses are infamous for hiding mountains of debt through financial interplay among all the firm's divisions and offshore companies. Thus they kept the companies' share prices artificially high to continue accumulating capital.

When their pyramid scheme collapsed in 2001, it caused the biggest bankruptcy in history.

Just before Enron stock plummeted on the market, the bosses dumped their shares to avoid losses. At the same time, Chief Executive Officer Kenneth Lay, a close friend of President George W. Bush and a big contributor to his campaign, lied in a videotaped message to Enron employees about the company's health.

The company savings plan mandated that employees buy Enron shares. Thousands of Enron workers lost their life savings while the executives held onto their fortunes.

Under the pressure of ongoing investigations into the Enron debt-hiding scam, lawyers for the post-bankruptcy Enron bosses came forward with the memos. But even some Wall Street insiders are warning against limiting scrutiny to corruption at Enron or even just to energy trading corporations.

In a May 10 opinion piecein the New York Times, Paul Krugman wrote that "federal officials, from George W. Bush on down, offered California nothing but sermons on the virtues of the free market. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which is supposed to police these things, found no evidence of foul play. Essentially, FERC asked energy companies whether they were manipulating the market. 'Who, us?' they replied--and that was that."

Krugman added: "The bigger story involves market manipulation by a number of producers. ... if no smoking-gun memos have yet come to light, what do you expect? The Enron story shows just how easy it is for companies to cover their tracks, especially when the regulators are in their corner. If Enron hadn't lost its clout by going bankrupt, you can be sure that we would never have heard about Fat Boy and Death Star."

In 1996 California's energy system was the first to be deregulated. Until that time the investor-owned utilities--Pacific Gas & Electric, Southern California Edison and San Diego Electric--controlled both production and supply.

Under deregulation, they shed their generating and transmission facilities to make way for giant energy traders who buy energy in a huge open auction market from giant private power producers.

The Bush administration has been a champion of deregulation. The White House even opposed the price cap applied during the worst days of the crisis.

A number of politicians wasted no time in calling for a Justice Department investigation into the market manipulation. Sen. Tom Daschle is even calling for jail sentences. Because of the myriad connections between the Bush administration and Enron, and because of their advocacy of unbridled capitalism, this is a prime opportunity for Democrat demagogues to shellac the Republicans.

So what's holding them back from nailing Bush and Cheney for the Enron scandal?

On the one hand, the government is the steering committee for the entire capitalist class. It is supposed to be responsible for reining in excesses by individual banking and corporate empires. Enron didn't just bilk customers, its workers and shareholders. A lot of capitalists lost money in the Enron mess and they're hopping mad about it.

On the other hand, this scandal comes at a time when the Bush administration is popular with the ruling class because of its massive military expansion and aggressive global policies. As a result, the Enron mess hasn't stuck to the Bush administration--not yet.

But some of the demagoguery from politicians emanates from their fear that the Enron debacle could provoke a very formidable reaction from the working class. And on that count, they have every reason to be afraid.

As the legions of those struggling against capitalist globalization and this endless imperialist war increase and find common cause with each other, more and more people in this country will see that the same U.S. banks and corporations that are bleeding the workers and poor around the world for mega-profits are also gouging the workers and poor from California to Connecticut. And it won't take a capitalist politician to make that connection.

Reprinted from the May 23, 2002, issue of Workers World newspaper

This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)

HOME :: U.S. NEWS :: WORLD NEWS :: EDITORIALS :: SUBSCRIBE :: DONATE