Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

The dirty truth on 'Clear Skies'

By Joyce Chediac

President George W. Bush has discovered Earth Day. He commemorated the 32nd anniversary of this anti-pollution marker in front of the media by romping in the snow in New York state's Adirondack mountains, and by pushing his environmental initiative.

"With Clear Skies legislation," he said, "America will do more to reduce power plant emissions than ever before in our nation's history."

The White House claims its initiative is much better than the Clean Air Act, now in effect. Environmental groups, however, say just the opposite is true--the Bush proposal allows more emissions than under the Clean Air Act. What's needed, they say, is for the government to enforce the Clean Air Act.

"It is now painfully clear that this is the most anti-environmental presidential administration ever," said Gregory Wetstone of the Natural Resources Defense Council. "On issue after issue, federal agencies have been promoting the agenda of corporate polluters at the expense of our clean air, clean water, protected lands and forest, and even our planet's climate."

On the question of power plant emissions, the Bush plan allows three times more toxic mercury emissions than current law would allow, and postpones forthcoming mercury limits by a decade.

It would allow 50 percent more sulfur emissions--which cause acid rain and premature death from respiratory disease--than current law. And it would push back clean-up standards from 2012 to 2018.

It would also allow hundreds of thousands of tons of additional smog-forming nitrogen-oxide pollution, and delay their cleanup for a decade beyond current requirements.

"Delaying cleanup of these plants will cause more asthma attacks and more cardio-pulmonary disease for thousands of Americans. And we will see thousands more premature deaths," John Walke, director of NRDC's Clean Air program, said.

Bush pro-polluter policies

Bush has been so openly pro-big-business at the expense of the environment that a top Environmental Protection Agency official resigned in February to protest the administration's so-called clean air policies. Eric Schaeffer, head of the EPA's Office of Regulatory Enforcement, drew the line at White House efforts to weaken tough emissions standards for power plants.

In his resignation letter, Schaeffer said he was tired of "fighting a White House that seems determined to weaken the rules we are trying to enforce." He expressed particular frustration with the administration's close relationship to industries that the EPA is supposed to regulate, and at Bush's unwillingness to pursue legal action against polluters.

Meanwhile, the White House's energy policy calls for $34 billion in tax subsidies to polluting energy industries.

Origins of Earth Day

Earth Day began 32 years ago as a campus-led movement to protect the environment. This movement has grown worldwide, targeting profit-hungry corporations and the imperialist military as the biggest polluters--from the deforestation of the Amazon basin to the depletion of the ozone layer to the many toxic dumps in communities of color.

It is the cheapest of shots for the Bush administration to try to expropriate Earth Day to push a pro-big-business, pro-polluters agenda. This attempt will surely backfire, and make enviroment-conscious people even angrier at the Bush administration and the corporate powers it so shamelessly represents.

Reprinted from the May 2, 2002, issue of Workers World newspaper

This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)

HOME :: U.S. NEWS :: WORLD NEWS :: EDITORIALS :: SUBSCRIBE :: DONATE