Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

Romanian steel workers chase U.S. capital out

Union protests, hunger strikes and fierce battles with new management over unpaid wages have reversed the privatization of the Resita steel mill in western Romania.

Noble Ventures, a U.S. company, snatched up the vast state-owned steel-melting complex for a song last September as that East European country faced heavy pressure to sell off state-controlled interests as a condition for membership in the European Union.

The Resita steel mill was nationalized in 1948, one year after the victory of Romania's socialist revolution, during which central planning and collectivization were introduced throughout the country to help develop industry and agriculture.

More than 40 years later, counter-revolutionaries prevailed following the execution-style murder of Communist leader Nicolae Ceausescu and his wife, Elena, in December 1989. Despite the pro-capitalist coup, 80 percent of the Romanian economy still remains under state ownership today.

Steel and aluminum companies in the U.S. and Britain are hungry to move in and devour the rich mineral wealth and industrial infrastructure and exploit the labor of the Romanian people, who built their modern facilities under socialist construction. But ongoing rebellions and organized resistance like the fight that 4,000 smelter workers and miners have put up since December 2000 in Resita are keeping the vultures from these big imperialist countries at bay.

Noble Ventures' so-called investment in Resita last year was considered the most significant from a foreign company in Romania. Now they are being chased out through an order canceling the privatization contract. The order was issued by Romanian courts and is backed up by statements from the current government--under fear of more protests from the steelworkers of Resita.

Nationalization of an industry in a country controlled by a capitalist bourgeoisie does not mean the transfer of ownership from one class to another. That happens only when the state doing the nationalizing is under the control of the workers. But it can stop the private owners' plans for massive layoffs, at least for the time being. This is clearly the intention of the steelworkers.

--G.A.

This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)

HOME :: U.S. NEWS :: WORLD NEWS :: EDITORIALS :: SUBSCRIBE :: DONATE