Social-democratic gov'ts feel anti-war heat
Large protests erupt in NATO countries
By John Catalinotto
Hundreds of thousands of people from the Middle East to
Africa to Europe took part in major demonstrations against the
U.S. bombing of Afghanistan the weekend of Oct. 12-13. Two of
the larger protests took place in the heart of major NATO
powers--in London and Berlin.
These actions took place as the U.S. continued bombing
Afghanistan, using cluster bombs and killing Afghani civilians.
This put the onus of terror on the Pentagon in the eyes of much
of the world.
Bush's war of "long duration" showed all signs of being an
imperialist war to arrange the division of the world and its
energy resources--especially in the Middle East and Central
Asia. British and German participation in this war makes even
clearer its predatory character.
British Prime Minister Tony Blair has been traveling around
the world trying to build up support for the "coalition"
Washington is using to back its moves against Afghanistan.
Blair is a more articulate defender of imperialist interests
than Bush, but there is no way of separating Britain's role
from its history of colonialism, especially in that area.
British imperialism is in the role it has occupied since
1945--junior partner of U.S. imperialism. While its political
leaders put their experience running the British Empire at the
service of Washington, they make sure the British ruling class
gets its share of the plunder.
But while the New York Times happily reprints Blair's
speeches, he has aroused growing opposition at home.
What distinguished the march in London, which organizers
said was 50,000 strong, was the broad multinational
participation. There was an especially large contingent from
the Muslim community--mainly South Asian--living in England
that is now about 4 million people.
Salma Yakoob of the Stop the War Coalition in Birmingham,
speaking in Trafalgar Square, described it well: "If only the
leftists had been here today, people would have said we were
all lefties," she said. ''If only CND [Campaign for Nuclear
Disarmament] had been here, they would have said it was the
middle-class elite. If it was only the Muslims, they would have
called us extremists. If it was only Asians and Black people,
they would have said it was the ethnic minorities.
"Tony Blair, we are here united against this war. You cannot
dismiss us all.'' (The Independent, Oct. 13)
British anti-war activist Jean Hatton told Workers World,
"The most popular placard carried by the demonstrators seemed
to be 'Not in our name,' a slogan used widely by protesters
against sanctions on Iraq. Others highlighted the double
standards employed by Western nations, where the deaths of
thousands in Iraq caused by these sanctions go largely
unreported."
She added that even neighborhoods in smaller cities saw many
expressions of solidarity between the historically British and
the immigrant Muslim population, and a strong feeling that the
people of Afghan istan should not suffer any additional
hardships.
"There is great unease across Britain. Even people who
supported the bombing of Yugoslavia and Iraq are asking what
can possibly be achieved by bombing a country already
devastated by war," Hatton said.
A new role for Germany
Since 1945, Wash ing ton has led the vast majority of
military assaults in the world, from Korea to Kosovo. London
and sometimes Paris send their troops in behind the Pentagon;
at times they act on their own. The German military, however,
was supposed to stay put--unless it was fighting the USSR under
NATO command.
Now for the first time Berlin has been openly invited to
take part in the action, and the Social Democrat/Green
government is jumping at the chance to send German youths to
their death.
In a major speech on Oct. 11, German Chancellor Gerhard
Schroeder said, "The willingness to provide security through
the military is an important declaration for Germany's allies."
It "means a new self-conception of German foreign policy....
Avoiding every direct risk cannot and must not be the guideline
of German foreign and security policy." (Washington Post, Oct.
12)
He added, "There are more reasons why Germany must show its
active solidarity ... historical reasons, contemporary reasons,
and reasons to do with the position of Germany in the
future."
Schroeder's speech found an echo. "This is a defining moment
for Germany and its role is being fixed," said Karl Kaiser,
director of the German Council on Foreign Relations. "It didn't
go unnoticed that when Bush spoke of the coalition around the
U.S., he said it was Britain, France, Australia and Germany.
And that has enormous meaning."
The Christian Democrats also back this aggressive policy.
Only the Party of Democratic Socialism refused to vote for
German participation in the war on Afghanistan.
This new eagerness to send their youth--working-class youth,
that is--into danger should be recognized for what it is. This
is a declaration that the German government wants to guarantee
that German imperialism gets its share of the spoils. In the
current crisis, that means its share of Middle East and Central
Asian oil and gas.
Protests in Berlin and Stuttgart
As in the U.S. and Britain, an ever-larger part of the
German population began to fear that the Pentagon's bombing of
Af ghan istan would kill and maim innocent people there and
only increase the dangers at home.
In Berlin a reported 50,000 people came out against the U.S.
war. Another 25,000 marched in Stuttgart.
Ruediger Goebel writing in the Berlin daily newspaper Junge
Welt on Oct. 15 noted that these protests were significantly
larger and more youthful than any during NATO's aggression
against Yugoslavia two years ago, with large numbers of
high-school students taking part.
This new youth activism is important, as it directly
confronts the move by German ruling circles to participate in
military adventures around the world. Some of these youths had
participated in anti-globalization actions.
Sebastian Schluesselburg, representing secondary-school
students, expressed the youths' dissent in a clear voice at the
Berlin protest. "Retaliatory military strikes have no backing
in the German student body, Mr. Chancellor," he said. Earlier
in the week students in Berlin had defied threats of school
punishment to take part in anti-war activity.
Germany still has a drafted army, although it is moving in
the direction of a more streamlined, professional and motorized
force. A vocal opponent of German militarization, Tobias
Pflueger, has already called upon German youth to refuse
service and on German soldiers to refuse to take part in any
support of the U.S.'s open-ended war.
Reprinted from the Oct. 25, 2001, issue of
Workers World newspaper
This article is copyright under a Creative
Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)
HOME
:: U.S. NEWS ::
WORLD NEWS ::
EDITORIALS ::
SUBSCRIBE ::
DONATE
Email
this article
Printable
page