Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

After job action by state workers

Ventura attacks the right to strike

By Steve Argue
St. Paul, Minn.

Beating back Minnesota Gov. Jesse "the Body" Ventura's "final offer," government workers have gotten a better contract proposal by going out on strike. While the contract is not yet ratified by the membership, union officials have already returned the members to work.

Now Ventura is saying he will cut jobs and needed government programs because of the strike. In addition, on Oct. 22, Ventura stated that government workers should not even be allowed to strike.

Ventura warned striking workers of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) and the Minnesota Association of Professional Employees (MAPE) that they would lose their jobs if they didn't drop their strike and give in to his demands.

Those on strike included highway maintenance workers, janitors, tax collectors and office clerks. Also included in the union are parole officers. The strike started on Oct. 1 and lasted two weeks.

Ventura claimed that workers would have to be laid off if he gave into their demands because there would not be money to pay them. Peter Benner, AFSCME Local 6 executive director, responded, "There are layoffs in good times. There are layoffs in bad times. So this doesn't deter us."

Ventura has now repeated this threat of layoffs, claiming the money isn't there to keep the workers. AFSCME Local 6 refutes this claim, reciting the government's own budget records. What this looks like is retaliation against the workers who stood up against Ventura's concessions contract. If the governor gets away with it, social programs will suffer as well from his cuts.

The 28,000 workers were forced out on strike by the governor's concessions contract proposal, which included an increase in health care costs for workers. Also included was a small cost-of-living increase of 3.8 percent in the first year and 2 percent in the years after. These cost of living increases would have been offset by the new health care costs.

The new contracts that are coming up for a vote include a 3.5-percent increase this year and next year for AFSCME employees and a 3-percent increase both years for MAPE employees.

What was obvious with the governor's earlier proposal was that workers would pay a lot more for health care. What the proposal left unclear is how much more. The clinics that workers use would be rated first, second and third tier, and different tiers would charge different amounts. Making this proposal completely unacceptable was the fact that the clinics were not even rated yet. Union members had no way of knowing what their health care cost increases would be under the proposed contract.

Under the new proposal the clinics are now rated. Workers will now know how much more they will be paying and be able to weigh that when they vote for or against the contract. In addition, MAPE employees will get a one-time lump payment of $250 designated to offset increased health care costs.

Overall the contract is better than the earlier proposal, but is still questionable in charging more for healthcare than in previous years. The contract comes to a vote in mid-November. Governor Ventura cited the war as the reason why workers should have accepted the earlier concession contract.

On Oct. 4 on a conservative talk-radio show, Ventura stated, "Personally, I would be going to work, because it's a tough time. We're going to war, in my opinion. Everybody has to bite the bullet a little bit."

In times of war and economic crisis the capitalist class always wants workers to pay the price while the bosses live in their luxurious mansions. Ventura's anti-union war drumming places him squarely alongside the ranks of the anti-worker politicians of the Democratic and Republican parties.

In addition, Ventura mobilized 1,000 National Guards to do some of the work of strikers at state-run facilities such as veterans' homes, hospitals and treatment facilities. The Department of Transportation also took out ads for scab snowplow drivers.

Teamster truck drivers refused to cross picket lines. Yet deeper union solidarity could have ended the strike very quickly and resulted in a better settlement. In the mid-1990s Gov. Arne Carlson's plan to call out the National Guard against bus drivers was thwarted by the Teamsters telling the governor that if he did so, they would call a general strike. This type of action, flexing union power against state power, should have been repeated.

AFSCME and MAPE workers deserve solidarity. They stood up in the front lines defending the standard of living of the working class against the ideological onslaught of the government, which was telling workers to sacrifice for the profits of the rich in a time of war.

No to layoffs! No to cuts in social services! No to curtailments on the right to strike!

Reprinted from the Nov. 1, 2001, issue of Workers World newspaper

This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)

HOME :: U.S. NEWS :: WORLD NEWS :: EDITORIALS :: SUBSCRIBE :: DONATE