Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

Struggle grows to stop legal lynchings

Texas plans post-election killing spree

By Gloria Rubac

Houston

This year alone, Texas Gov. George W. Bush has executed mentally ill people, juveniles, a battered woman and revolutionary activists. Thirty-three prisoners have been put to death in this state so far this year. Seven more are scheduled to die before yearend--but not until after the November presidential election is past.

In fact, four executions are scheduled during the 10 days following the presidential election. Another three are set for December, with three more slated to follow in January.

During the presidential debates, Vice President Al Gore said he supports the death penalty and has no quarrel with Bush's record of 144 executions. Gore refused to call for a moratorium despite many studies showing how the death penalty is used disproportionately against people of color and the poor.

Three Texas prisoners whose cases are receiving public scrutiny are Calvin Burdine, a gay man; Miguel Angel Flores, a Mexican citizen; and Johnny Paul Penry, who is mentally disabled. Flores and Penry are among those scheduled to die in November.

Court: sleeping lawyer okay

Burdine was tried in 1984 and represented by a court-appointed attorney, Joe Cannon. According to several jurors and the court clerk, Cannon often fell asleep. In fact, Cannon reportedly dozed while prosecutors cross-examined Burdine--a grilling that took up 72 pages of the court transcript.

As a result, Cannon said nothing during this cross-examination, even when Burdine was asked clearly prejudicial questions about his sexuality.

One year ago a federal district judge overturned Burdine's death sentence. The judge ruled that this was a no-brainer, noting that reversal should be automatic when a defendant's attorney sleeps during the trial.

But in a shocking 2-1 ruling on Oct. 27, the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that it is impossible to determine that counsel slept during "a critical phase" of Burdine's trial.

One of the two judges who voted against Burdine is Edith Jones. George Kendall, a staff attorney with the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund in New York, noted that "Jones is on every short list I have seen for Gov. Bush's possible Supreme Court nominees."

Njeri Shakur, a leader of the Texas Death Penalty Abolition Movement in Houston, told Workers World, "The Oct. 27 ruling by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is saying that he didn't prove that his attorney slept during the 'important' parts of his trial and therefore no harm was done.

"This ruling is a total mockery of anything related to justice," Shakur stressed. "Calvin Burdine should be released from death row."

Burdine's attorney is appealing this ruling to the full Fifth Circuit Court and to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.

High profile case draws support

Despite a string of outrageous court rulings, death-penalty foes and immigrant-rights activists are waging a struggle to stop the Nov. 9 execution of Miguel Angel Flores, a Mexican citizen on death row in Texas.

Flores' attorneys and family have taken his case to the international community and the U.S. State Department, as well as to Bush and the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles.

In a formal protest to the State Department on Oct. 19, Mexican government officials said that they didn't find out about the charges against Flores until nearly one year after he had been sentenced to death. They asked that the sentence be commuted to life. And they requested that the State Department intercede with officials in Texas.

Three European diplomats joined Mexico in appeals to Bush and the pardons board to halt the execution of Flores.

The French consulate in Houston reported on Nov. 4 that French and Swedish ambassadors to the U.S., and the head of the European Union's Delegation of the European Commission, sent a letter requesting a stay of execution. Their letter cited provisions of international law under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relation that should have allowed Flores to contact Mexican officials.

Anti-death penalty activists held a militant protest at Bush campaign headquarters here on Nov. 3. Campaign workers were so upset that they called the Houston police. The cops responded with seven squad cars to handle the 20 protesters.

Many members of the Flores family attended the demonstration and spoke to the crowd and to reporters.

Another demonstration is planned for Election Day.

Film highlights Flores case

On Oct. 23, the film "La Espalda Del Mundo" ("The Back of the World")--winner of the prestigious International Critics Award at the San Sebastian Film Festival--premiered in Texas.

This moving film highlights the effects of Texas executions on prisoners' families. Each member of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles received a videocassette of the film.

The film includes a series of interviews with Flores' family. In one of them, his grandfather Tomas Rangel says, "If Miguel is given a date of execution I would rather be dead. I don't want to be alive for his execution because I don't think I could deal with it."

One of the central issues raised by Flores' current attorneys in the film is the failure of his original trial lawyer to call any members of his family to testify on his behalf during the penalty phase of the trial.

Flores' lawyers are urging Bush to direct ly intervene in Flores' clemency appeal.

These attorneys cite a little-known provision of Texas law that allows the Board of Pardons and Paroles to investigate and consider a recommendation of commutation of sentence in a case based on the governor's written request.

A third scheduled execution drawing attention is that of a mentally disabled man, Johnny Paul Penry, who is set to be killed on Nov. 16.

Penry, who has the mental abilities of a 6- or 7-year-old child, has supporters around the world. They charge that the execution of a mentally disabled prisoner is a violation of human rights and international laws.

'Change is coming!'

The last year has been a tumultuous one for the 3,600 people on death row in the U.S., as well as for the growing movement of anti-death penalty activists.

In January, the governor of Illinois called for a statewide moratorium on executions. This set off a chain reaction of events that have exposed the raw racism and blatant injustice of capital punishment being carried out in the U.S.

Over 30 U.S. cities have now called for a moratorium on executions.

The dam of public questioning about the use of the death penalty burst forth into public criticism and outrage around Texas and the world with the June 22 killing of Shaka Sankofa, also known as Gary Graham.

The failure of Bush and the courts to stop the execution of a man whose many supporters argued was innocent--a man who never had the opportunity to have a court consider all the new evidence in his case--caused reactions from skepticism to militant outrage.

From that day forward, every time Bush said that Texas had never executed an innocent person, his credibility waned.

Since Sankofa's legal lynching, the pace of executions has slowed down considerably in Texas. There have been only two this fall. Bush had averaged one execution for every two weeks he was governor.

For Bush to have executed a Mexican citizen and a mentally disabled man before the election would have caused even more scrutiny of his state's assembly-line death machine that has already become a public embarrassment.

'A national embarrassment'

But now Texas is set to break its own state record of 34 executions in one year, set in 1998.

In a broad critique of capital punishment in Texas, an October report by the Texas Defender Service concludes that the state's death penalty system is in dire need of change. The report cites prosecutorial misconduct, racial bias, phony experts and inadequate lawyers for poor defendants.

This report follows another critical study, presented last month by a committee of the State Bar of Texas, that described the state's system of providing legal representation to the poor as "a national embarrassment."

Shakur observed, "The movement to stop the racist, anti-poor death machinery is growing, especially in the poor and oppressed communities where we feel the direct effect of the prisons and these legal lynchings.

"The murders this year of Kamau Wilkerson and Shaka Sankofa, two revolutionary African men, will not be forgotten. We will avenge their deaths.

"No matter who is the next president," Shakur concluded, "we will be in Washington on Jan. 20 to protest his inauguration. There we will demand freedom for revolutionary political prisoner Mumia Abu-Jamal and we will demand that all executions be stopped."

This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)

HOME :: U.S. NEWS :: WORLD NEWS :: EDITORIALS :: SUBSCRIBE :: DONATE