Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

ELECTION HYPOCRISY

Media give distorted view of Haitian vote

By G. Dunkel

Jean-Bertrand Aristide will be Haiti's next president. He received over 91 percent of the votes cast in that country's Nov. 26 presidential election.

A surprising number of North American newspapers covered the election. And not just major newspapers known for their international coverage, like the Washington Post, New York Times and Toronto Star.

Nor was it confined to regional papers that serve areas with large Haitian communities, like the New York Daily News, Newsday, the Montreal Gazette, the Boston Globe and the St. Petersburg Times.

Papers like the Calgary Herald, the San Diego Union-Tribune, the Houston Chronicle, the Omaha World-Herald and the St. Louis Post-Dispatch all ran stories or editorials on this election.

You might think that among all these stories in papers spread over the vastness of North America there would be divergent views. But all of the commentaries were remarkably similar.

Elections in Haiti were chaotic and badly run, they said. Jean-Bertrand Aristide and his party, the Fanmi Lavalas (Lavalas Family), would most likely win but there were no foreign observers to guarantee the integrity of the polling, they said.

Parliamentary elections last May were rigged, they claimed, and the Election Board (CEP) was composed of Fanmi Lavalas partisans.

Some reporters even interviewed Haitian "opposition" leaders without explaining their backgrounds, so workers here couldn't evaluate their charges.

For example, when the Los Angeles Times quoted Chavannes Jean-Baptiste, a "peasant leader" in the Central Plateau who says he is "hiding from armed assassins," it should have also reported that he is in a political alliance with forces that supported the old Duvalier dictatorship and the 1991 coup against Aristide.

Other supposedly "independent" sources, like the Haitian radio stations Radio Metropole and Radio Galaxie, called the election illegitimate because "opposition parties did not participate." They gave wildly deflated estimates of voter turnout--5 percent or less. The official figure from the CEP said turnout was over 63 percent.

A number of reports made a point of emphasizing the "violence" on election day. Two pipe bombs exploded in Port-au-Prince, Haiti's capital, and one or two elsewhere.

But compared to earlier elections, there was no large-scale violence.

Another perspective

Haiti Progress--a progressive newspaper that is published in French, Creole and English in Brooklyn, N.Y., and has editorial offices in Port-au-Prince and correspondents throughout Haiti--reported that the election represented a "people's victory" and was a "check to terror." It pointed out that the elections "unfolded with dignity and serenity."

On Dec. 3 the New York Times Week in Review ran an article with the following admission buried near the end of the story: "... even diplomats and members of civic groups critical of Mr. Aristide admit that Lavalas enjoyed such popular support that it was virtually guaranteed convincing victories."

While the big-business media were unanimously critical of Haiti's election, they all made a big point of saying it was not comparable to the mess a few miles north in Florida. This would be a "glib comparison," they said.

Of course, Haiti is far poorer than Florida. Some polling places lacked electricity; paper ballots had to be counted by hand using candles or flashlights.

But they were counted. The administrative problems due to Haiti's poverty were overcome and the results were announced within a week.

Florida has electricity. But many of the votes cast by its Black citizens--including those of Haitian descent--will not be counted.

The whole media campaign against the Haitian elections is consistent with the racist attitude the U.S. ruling class has held against Haiti since that country threw off its French slave masters and declared itself independent in 1804.

But it has another point too: to cast doubt on Aristide's victory and his support among the Haitian people. These are steps to prepare the U.S. people for intervention in Haiti against Aristide and the masses, to keep Haiti from following the example of its neighbor, socialist Cuba.

For eyewitness reports on the Haitian elections, readers can visit the Haiti Progress Web site at www.haitiprogres.com

This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)

HOME :: U.S. NEWS :: WORLD NEWS :: EDITORIALS :: SUBSCRIBE :: DONATE