Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

A major cover-up

The Hiett case & the U.S. war in Colombia

By Deirdre Griswold

Which takes precedence in the U.S. media: Nielson ratings or the strategic interests of U.S. imperialism?

Most of the time, it appears that network ratings drive the media's sensationalism. But there's a truly sensational bit of news that hardly any newspaper or network seems to want to touch.

It involves a drug smuggling case. All the elements are there for a juicy, long-running story.

A U.S. national, Laurie Anne Hiett, has been charged with sending four shipments of heroin from Colombia to the United States. She surrendered to federal authorities in August and was freed on bond after pleading not guilty.

But that's just the beginning. What makes this case truly sensational is how the heroin was shipped here. It was mailed from the U.S. Embassy in Bogota.

And why was Hiett able to use the embassy's mail service? Because she is married to U.S. Army Col. James Hiett.

And what was the colonel's job?

He was the commander of the U.S. Army's anti-drug operation in Colombia. The top man.

You can't get a more sensational story than that. How come none of the commentators are talking about it? How come there are no screaming headlines? No enraged editorials?

Well, some might say, give Laurie Anne Hiett her day in court. Maybe this is all a mistake. Didn't she say she's innocent?

But the New York Times of Jan. 20, in a small article on page four of the Metro section, reported that Hiett is now expected to plead guilty in a plea bargain. Nobody--the prosecution or her lawyers--could be reached for comment.

The plea bargain, of course, conveniently keeps this case from going to trial, where all kinds of questions could be asked.

This amazing case is being swept under the rug at the very same moment that the U.S. government has announced it is so distressed by Colombian drug trafficking that it will spend $1.6 billion on aid, most of it to the Colombian military, to deal with this scourge.

Colombia now ranks third on the list of countries that receive U.S. military aid.

Secretary of State Madeleine Albright went to Colombia personally to announce this huge increase in helicopters, weapons and U.S. Special Forces "trainers" to invade this South American country. She used the occasion to attack the revolutionary groups that have been fighting for deep social change, calling them "narco-terrorists."

Albright's protestations to the contrary, it should be perfectly clear that U.S. intervention in Colombia has nothing to do with drugs. If Washington had one drop of sincerity on this issue, the government would have immediately put Col. Hiett and his whole crew on trial. But instead, Hiett has been "relocated" to an unnamed location.

Several years ago, a general in Cuba was charged with involvement in drug trafficking. His past record of bravery and his personal acquaintance with President Fidel Castro made no difference in how he was treated. In fact, the Cuban government took this case extremely seriously precisely because of his high position. The general was tried, found guilty and executed.

There is no drug problem in Cuba today.

Has that ever happened to the real drug kingpins in this country--the bankers who launder billions of dollars in drug money, the "front men" who run so-called legitimate businesses as covers for drug dealing? Or is it the petty dealers, the small-time users, who fill the prisons?

The U.S. political-military establishment has concocted the phony "war on drugs" to divert attention from what it is really doing in Colombia. The mission is the same as it was in Vietnam, or at the Bay of Pigs. It is to prevent an anti-capitalist popular movement from transforming Colombian society.

The mission is to stop a socialist revolution that is long overdue, not just in Colombia, not just in all of Latin America, but in the world as a whole.

That's why all the big-time editors at the media conglomerates, which today are the biggest of big businesses, have conspired to treat the Hiett case as non-news.

This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)

HOME :: U.S. NEWS :: WORLD NEWS :: EDITORIALS :: SUBSCRIBE :: DONATE