Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

Right-wing ballot measure

Big money behind attack on same-sex marriage

By Preston Wood

Los Angeles

Once again, in the regressive and reactionary tradition of big money and right-wing mobilizations in California, two state ballot measures passed on March 7. One intensifies repression against young people, primarily Black and Latino youth, and the other upholds discrimination against the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people.

Proposition 21 lowers the age that a youth can be tried as an adult from 16 to 14 years of age. Proposition 22--known also as the Defense of Marriage Act or the Knight Initiative--reinforces an already existing ban on same-sex marriages in the state.

These measures follow right in line with previously divisive and racist campaigns like Proposition 187 that denied basic rights to immigrants in California, Proposition 209 that struck a blow against affirmative action, and Proposition 227 that targeted bilingual education.

While the repressive components of Proposition 21 are hidden in a huge volume of words, Proposition 22 uses only 17 words to take a direct shot at the fundamental rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people to equal treatment under the law.

The measure designates this whole group of people as unfit for the rights accorded to heterosexuals. It is alarming that a measure so bigoted and hateful could even be granted ballot status.

And it calls into question: Who will be the next target of the right wing?

How did these reactionaries win these two divisive ballot measures? By spending millions of dollars in slick ad campaigns designed to manipulate and confuse the public. They spent a reported $16 million just getting Proposition 22 passed.

They reinforced racist and anti-gay stereotypes. And they mobilized the most conservative sectors of voters.

Those who voted represent a small percentage of the population in this state. Disenfranchisement alone excluded prisoners, millions of immigrants and others.

Of the 46 percent of registered voters who cast their ballots, the heaviest voter turnout was in conservative areas of the state where the California Reaganite Republican Party still has a strong base.

Fundamentalist Christian religious leaders and the Roman Catholic Church hierarchy actively mobilized their members.

The statewide voting results were almost identical for both propositions: approximately 60 percent voted for and 40 percent voted against. Voting patterns among different demographic groups were pretty much the same for both measures.

The results of this voting were disheartening and even shocking to many. But they reconfirm the basic lesson that progressive change doesn't come from the ballot box. The anger and alarm of progressives and the consciousness of those prodded to take a position on these measures can strengthen the movement for lesbian/gay/bi/trans rights and against the racist prison-industrial complex.

After the voting results were in, militant demonstrations took place in San Francisco and in Latino neighborhoods in Los Angeles against Proposition 21.

And lesbian/gay/bi and trans activists have vowed to intensify their struggle for equality and take that struggle into the streets.

This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)

HOME :: U.S. NEWS :: WORLD NEWS :: EDITORIALS :: SUBSCRIBE :: DONATE