Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

CAPITALISM'S DRIVE TO MONOPOLIZE

Hearst swallows up S.F. Chronicle

By Gloria La Riva

San Francisco

In a further move toward monopolization, the Hearst Corp. announced Aug. 6 that it has purchased the San Francisco Chronicle, this city's morning newspaper and the 11th-biggest newspaper in the country. Hearst Corp., a multi-billion-dollar media empire, already owns the San Francisco Examiner, the Chronicle's afternoon competitor.

At the same time, Hearst President and Chief Executive Officer Frank Bennack declared that the Examiner is now up for sale. Given the unfavorable deal demanded for its purchase, the Examiner will likely remain unsold and merge with the Chronicle.

Although editorial rivals for over 30 years, the Chronicle and Examiner have shared operations and profits since 1965 through a Joint Operating Agreement. JOAs are the federal government's exemption to anti-monopoly laws for newspapers. JOAs permit newspapers to combine operations and share profits; the rationale is that one or both would fail otherwise.

Afternoon newspapers are most vulnerable without a JOA, since they usually have much lower circulation than morning papers. The Chronicle's daily circulation is 482,268. The Examiner's is 114,776. On Sunday, they jointly produce a paper with a circulation of 605,356.

With a JOA granted in 1965, the Chronicle and Examiner combined under a new corporation--the San Francisco Newspaper Agency. The papers maintain separate editorial staffs and operate on opposite ends of the downtown plant. But they share production workers, presses, delivery system, advertising and other facilities.

The SFNA employs some 2,000 printers, engravers, drivers, vendors, press, circulation and advertising workers. The Examiner also has its own staff of 217; the Chronicle has 375 editors and reporters.

With the purchase of the Chronicle as well as the SFNA, Hearst obtains all the production and delivery facilities the SFNA owns. Thus the Examiner is doomed, since it has no meaningful production system to accompany its name.

The announced sale of the Examiner is only a formality to meet the legal requirements of the JOA, as Hearst executives admitted.

That means San Francisco will soon join the long list of cities that have gone from several daily newspapers down to two papers, then to one. In a word: monopoly.

In the last 15 years, 12 JOAs have been terminated, from Miami to Pittsburgh to Knoxville, Tenn.

But Professor Robert Terrell told Workers World that there already is a monopoly in San Francisco. Terrell is chairperson of the Department of Mass Communications at California State University at Hayward.

He maintained: "As someone once said, there's not a dime's difference between the two. They claim they are in competition with each other, but there is precious little competition, nor difference of philosophy with regards to how they cover the Bay area."

In particular, Terrell--who is African American--spoke of the newspapers' refusal to cover the issues in the Bay area's communities of color in a meaningful way.

"The sports columnists are 20 to 30 years behind the times. It's almost a colonial mentality the way they cover sports news.

"San Francisco is 35 percent Asian, but you wouldn't know it by reading the Chronicle's society page, which represents the rich, white San Francisco of old. That goes for the Examiner, too."

When asked about the executives' claim that jobs will not be affected, Terrell concluded: "It's just a matter of time before the principle of economies of scale kick in. They'll say, `We don't need two sports editors, two editorial-page editors, we don't need two style sections.

"But San Francisco is a union town, and I think they remember what happened in your strike."

In 1994, some 2,700 workers of the Agency, Chronicle and Examiner struck the newspapers for 11 days in a successful strike that defeated the companies' strike-breaking plans.

The papers are 100-percent union, with 10 unions representing the workers. In 1995, a 10-year contract was signed with the unions, set to expire along with the JOA.

Most of the workers are employees of the Agency under the JOA. With the pending merger, the Agency would be defunct. That leaves the workers and unions vulnerable, regardless of management's promises.

Meanwhile, very little financial information about the sale is forthcoming. Hearst Corp., founded in 1887, is privately owned. Its worth is estimated at almost $2.4 billion.

It owns 12 newspapers and magazines, and owns or controls 26 TV stations.

The Chronicle is also privately owned. So the paper's value when sold is a guarded secret.

Chronicle Publishing Co. owns several newspapers in the United States, along with television stations, including Channel 4, KRON in the city.

Joint Operating Agreements were never about preserving newspaper diversity. For 31 years in San Francisco, the JOA allowed the two entities to amass a greater fortune by splitting costs than they would have made by operating alone.

This in turn gave them an opportunity to use their larger share of profits to expand their holdings and control more media outlets.

The future for the workers remains to be seen. Their union's resolve to defend their jobs and contracts--not only now but also when the contracts expire in 2005--will be decisive.

It is certain, though, that the pace of monopoly in media is quickening. The Chronicle and Examiner are no exception to the inevitable concentration of wealth in fewer hands under capitalism.

This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)

HOME :: U.S. NEWS :: WORLD NEWS :: EDITORIALS :: SUBSCRIBE :: DONATE