Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

EXPERIMENTAL DRUG TEST

Pentagon poisoned GIs

Reserves right to do it again

By Hillel Cohen

A Pentagon-sponsored study has reported that Gulf War Syndrome may have been at least partly caused by an experimental drug that unsuspecting U.S. troops were ordered to take. Before the 1991 invasion of Iraq, the Pentagon brass ordered as many as 300,000 U.S. soldiers to take three pills of the drug pyridostigmine bromide each morning.

An estimated 100,000 veterans of that war have reported symptoms of what has become known as Gulf War Syndrome--chronic pain and fatigue, nausea, memory loss, sleep disorders and general neurological complaints. Some even died prematurely or became permanently disabled, and some veterans have reported severe birth defects among children born after the war.

The Pentagon paid for the study carried out by the Rand Corp., a so-called Pentagon think tank. Study author Dr. Beatrice Golomb concluded that, while PB was not necessarily the cause of Gulf War Syndrome, "the possibility can't be dismissed."

Even this indefinite conclusion is a huge admission. For years, the U.S. government has denied that Gulf War Syndrome even existed. Officials told veterans who filed for disability benefits that they were imagining their illnesses and refused to pay for testing or treatment.

After tens of thousands of complaints piled up and couldn't be ignored, the Pentagon routinely rejected any responsibility. Military officials have claimed that poor wartime record keeping made definitive studies difficult.

The Pentagon claims it gave PB to GIs as a preventive antidote against a chemical warfare agent known as soman. Although PB is a known drug approved for a rare neurological disorder, it was never tested for safety in wide-scale use, nor is it proven to be protective against soman.

The U.S. government has never even suggested that Iraq might have had soman. Yet it administered an untested drug against an unanticipated agent. Was it a massive field test with GIs as guinea pigs? Was it to condition GIs into believing they were at risk of a deadly chemical attack in order to arouse more fear and hostility toward the Iraqi people?

Neither the Rand report nor the capitalist media asks these questions.

Not the only suspect

PB was one of several experimental drugs given to GIs. Other factors may have contributed to Gulf War Syndrome, which is composed of several ailments with overlapping symptoms. No one can tell for sure the effects of the toxic smoke from the thousands of oil and chemical fires that burned for months. Almost a million anti-tank shells used by U.S. forces contained depleted uranium--a radioactive, heavy metal recycled from the toxic waste left behind after the processing of uranium for nuclear weapons and nuclear power plants.

Since large numbers of Iraqi civilians who never had access to the experimental drugs given GIs have also reported illnesses and birth defects similar to those associated with Gulf War Syndrome, it is likely that factors in addition to the PB drug were involved. The Rand study also recognizes the likelihood of other contributory factors, but steers clear of addressing which ones.

The study itself was done only as a result of enormous pressure from U.S. veterans' groups and anti-war activists. Earlier Pentagon "studies" and reports denied the possibility that PB, oil fires, depleted uranium or local viruses or bacteria could possibly be linked to veterans' illnesses. By focusing only on PB, the current report may be designed to cover up other possible factors.

Because DU is such a substantial part of U.S. weaponry, an admission about DU could lead to an international outcry against the U.S. military, or at least to a campaign to ban the use of DU weapons.

Nonetheless, the admission about PB after years of official denials has major importance. Right now, the Pentagon is forcing over a million GIs to accept vaccinations against anthrax. U.S. troops who refuse the injections are subject to court martial. Like PB, the anthrax vaccine was tested for safety only for small numbers. It was designed to protect against the agricultural form of the disease but has never been tested for usefulness against the militarized version.

As a hysteria campaign is promoted over the risks of bioterrorism, there will be more "initiatives" like the anthrax vaccination program. The government may promote experimental programs to guard against the alleged threat of biological or chemical agents. The Pentagon, the CIA and the FBI want to direct public-health policy making in the name of anti-terrorism.

Of course, the people have the Pentagon's word of honor that the programs are necessary for defense and safety--just like PB.

Asked if the Rand report findings would alter Pentagon policy about the use of PB, Dr. Bernard Rostker, an under secretary of the Army assigned to oversee the investigation of Gulf War Syndrome, said, "Its continued use is warranted."

This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)

HOME :: U.S. NEWS :: WORLD NEWS :: EDITORIALS :: SUBSCRIBE :: DONATE