Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

KKK goons kill gay white man

Alabama lynching shows need for united action

By Leslie Feinberg

The horrific Feb. 19 killing of a gay, white textile mill worker in Sylacauga, Ala., had all the ritualized trappings of a Klan-style lynching.

Steven Eric Mullins and Charles Monroe Butler Jr. have confessed to killing Billy Jack Gaither on the banks of a creek where many area churches held baptisms. The two men beat Gaither to death with axe handles. Then they set his body ablaze on a pyre of kerosene-soaked tires.

Mullins, an avowed white supremacist, reportedly wore his KKK t-shirts around town and repeatedly provoked African American residents.

When the details of Gaither's murder were finally released by the local sheriff's department they were met with outrage and horror by people from all walks of life. Protests and vigils are already planned--from Sylacauga to New York.

The national media have highlighted Gaither's brutal death. Politicians all the way up to the White House felt the need to speak out in generalities against Gaither's killing.

Why did this crime find its way into national consciousness? Not simply because it was ghastly. Moments of drunken rage or jealous frenzy spark many cruel and horrendous murders that do not attract national attention.

Certainly the media plays a role in determining which cases become prominent. But grass-roots reports of the murder of Billy Jack Gaither traveled fast as a heartbeat through the arteries of the Internet.

The murder of Billy Jack Gaither sent shock waves across this country and around the world because it was a byproduct of right-wing ideology, stripped away of all pretense and hypocrisy.

Billy Jack Gaither's murderers plotted their crime for two weeks. By the killers' own admissions, the gruesome murder was carried out for one reason only: Gaither was gay.

It was a lynching. Like the racist lynching of James Byrd Jr., dragged to his death by white supremacists in Jasper, Texas, last June. Like the anti-gay lynching of Matthew Shepard--a college student who was left to die tied to a wooden fence in Laramie, Wyo., last October.

These murders have begun to awaken a widespread consciousness that each act of right-wing terror--if left unanswered and unchecked--emboldens other fascist elements.

As a result, discussions are taking place in offices, factories, campuses, community centers and homes across the country about why these lynchings are taking place, and how this reactionary violence can be halted.

Will hate crime laws stop hate crimes?

President Bill Clinton issued a statement March 5 denouncing the murder of Gaither. He compared it to the killings of Byrd and Shepard.

Of course, it has been the Clinton administration that has provided a bulwark for the attacks on affirmative action. Clinton found common ground with reactionary Jesse Helms in attacking same-sex marriages. And early in his administration he surrendered to the Pentagon brass when they stepped up their "Don't ask, don't tell" witch hunts.

In his statement, Clinton said he would work for passage of the Hate Crimes Prevention Act. That legislation strengthens the power of the Justice Department to prosecute crimes committed against lesbian and gay victims.

And Alabama State Rep. Alvin Holmes has filed a bill that would broaden the state hate-crime laws to cover gays and lesbians.

Alabama, like Wyoming and 39 other states, provides increased penalties for crimes based on race, religion, ethnicity, national origin or disability. But 18 of these states exclude sexual orientation.

This angers many activists who point out that by leaving out the specific oppression of lesbians, gays, trans and bisexuals, the cops and courts are signaling bashers that it's open season on these targeted segments of the population. And because they are not considered official "hate crimes," anti-gay attacks are not documented and compiled.

These activists are telling legislators that it's time for the state to wield its power by cracking down on gay- and trans-bashers.

It's true that the exclusion of sexual orientation rests on anti-gay bigotry--plain and simple.

But the question is: Will hate crime laws stop hate crimes?

It's not clear, for example, how beefed-up sentencing might have prevented the murders of Byrd, Shepard or Gaither. Their killers all knew they faced the death penalty if they were caught and the case was tried as capital murder. There is no "stiffer" sentence.

At this moment opposition to the death penalty in the progressive movement is so broad and diverse that it may signal a turning point in the struggle to abolish it altogether. Prominent individuals and organizations have denounced the use of executions by the state as a predominantly racist, anti-poor weapon.

And, as gay activist Michael Bronski noted in a Feb. 19 article in the Boston Phoenix, "Although there are not many openly gay men on death row, it is clear that anti-gay prejudice plays a role in deciding who gets the death penalty."

He cited examples by Donna Clark, the London-based filmmaker who created the documentary "Dykes on Death Row." She noted that women who are perceived to be lesbian are more apt to get the death sentence. And that likelihood increases for women who are considered masculine.

"Gay men are at similar risk," Bronski wrote. Among the examples he offered was the case of Calvin Burdine, an openly gay man sentenced to death in Texas. The prosecuting attorney reportedly asked for the death penalty because "Sending a homosexual to a penitentiary isn't a very bad punishment."

Recently 11 major lesbian and gay organizations, representing the multinational spectrum of that movement, issued statements calling for the elimination of the death penalty altogether. And Billy Jack Gaither's own father said he opposes the death penalty, even in the case of his son's killers. (March 5, CNN)

The call for politicians to strengthen the overall punitive powers of the state through hate crime laws has been met with opposition. Some activists argue that the organized force of the state--police, judges, prison authorities and the military--will not bring its weight to bear for justice for the lesbian/gay/bi/trans communities or any other oppressed group.

For example, activists in these communities have fought the discriminatory Pentagon purges of gays and lesbians. But many of these gay-rights fighters harbor no illusions that forcing the brass to abandon this reactionary policy will make the Pentagon a kinder, gentler killing machine.

The state has always been used as a weapon against communities that organize for sexual and gender liberation.

Consider the anti-gay witch hunts of the 1950s McCarthy era. FBI infiltration and disruption of the early gay and lesbian liberation movement. Court-ordered refusals of child-custody rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans parents. Police entrapment. Brutality against lesbian/gay/bi/trans prisoners.

The lesbian/gay/bi/trans communities have always had to organize to protect themselves from repression by the state. The 1969 Stonewall Rebellion was a four-day running exercise in community self-defense against organized, violent police raids.

After Matthew Shepard's murder, on Oct. 19, some 8,000 people tried to hold a political march in New York City. They were attacked by bashers in blue uniforms. Using the excuse that march organizers had no permit, the NYPD beat and arrested scores of people at the peaceful demonstration.

Since the Giuliani administration illegally refuses to grant permits for progressive protests, the scheduled March 15 demonstration against Gaither's murder is yet another bold confrontation by the lesbian/gay/bi/trans community against the repressive force of the state.

Which way forward?

How the murders of James Byrd Jr., Matthew Shepard and Billy Jack Gaither are characterized helps to either encourage or discourage a mass response.

The media and politicians refer to these as acts of hatred. Certainly hatred is involved. But reducing these crimes to this extreme human emotion limits an understanding of the role of reactionary political ideology in shaping and fomenting that hatred.

The violent bigotry that drives racist and anti-gay lynching is not an enduring feature of human nature. There's a great deal of evidence, for example, that prior to the colonial conquest of the Americas Indigenous peoples lived and worked in cooperative societies in which same-sex love and gender variance were held in high esteem.

That's true of ancient cooperative societies on the European continent as well. The demonization of gay and trans people arose in tandem with the development of those societies into class-divided economies. The colonialists brought these forms of bigotry with their guns and bibles.

The rise of the slave trade and the campaign to wipe out Indigenous peoples and steal their land and resources required the refinement of racist ideology by the ruling classes.

The Ku Klux Klan and racist lynching began as barbarous counterrevolutionary weapons by the former slavocracy, in partnership with the northern industrialists, to crush the gains of Black Reconstruction a little more than a century ago.

Today's media reports that blame the lynching of Byrd, Shepard and Gaither on the region of the country in which they lived, or the size of the neighboring populations, obscure the fact that these murders are a national phenomenon with ties to right-wing agitation.

What will it take to push back the right wing and to win even greater social and economic gains?

The answer can be found in the coalescing anger against the NYPD execution of Amadou Diallo. In the quick reaction of tens of thousands to march in the streets against the murder of Matthew Shepard.

And today, the growing momentum of the April 24 national mobilization to stop the racist execution of political prisoner Mumia Abu-Jamal is shaping up to be the kind of mass coalition that can begin to effectively push back both legal and illegal lynching.

This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)

HOME :: U.S. NEWS :: WORLD NEWS :: EDITORIALS :: SUBSCRIBE :: DONATE