Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

AT WTO MEETS

Fortune 500 bleed world's workers, poor

U.S. imperialism, not china, is the problem

By Fred Goldstein

The gathering of the so-called World Trade Organization in Seattle is meeting angry mass protests in the streets by workers and militants from all sectors of the movement.

This meeting was convened, not by the oppressed and the workers who create the $7 trillion worth of commodities traded annually on the world capitalist markets, but by governments representing the big bankers and multinational corporations that profit and get rich from this trade.

The trade ministers of 136 member states are meeting in this "Millennium Round" to launch a new round of regulations designed to create more opportunities for the multinationals.

Both oppressor and oppressed

The WTO, however, is divided between imperialist countries and oppressed countries. The giant banks and corporate monopolies of the former control the technology and dominate the production, transportation and communication arteries of the world. The latter have been plundered for centuries and driven into a state of underdevelopment.

Any protests should be directed against the plunderers.

In this regard, no one should be diverted by the reactionary position taken by AFL-CIO head John Sweeney and by many liberals. They are using the Seattle demonstrations to attack the People's Republic of China over its negotiations with the U.S. government arranging terms for China's acceptance into the WTO.

The present AFL-CIO leadership has admirably tried to invigorate the labor movement by organizing the unorganized, particularly low-wage workers. It has opened up opportunities for many idealistic young people to help in this struggle and end sweatshops. Such efforts should be supported and energetically broadened.

But Sweeney's broadside against China is an unprincipled, anti-communist attack based on a narrow protectionist position that is harmful to all workers.

Sweeney issued a statement saying that the AFL-CIO will firmly oppose China's entry into the WTO. As grounds he cited a litany of unsubstantiated charges about China's denial of workers' rights, slave labor in the prisons, child labor, the illegality of organizing trade unions and human rights.

What are the facts?

China is a country comprising one fifth of the human race. It was ruthlessly colonized for 150 years. It was "opened up" by imperialism, divided into spheres of influence, and governed by a feudal landlord class propped up by the imperialists--the same world powers that run the WTO today.

What rights did the workers and peasants have under the old regime? Only the right to be hungry, exploited, and die of famine and poverty. That was workers' rights in the old China--until the Chinese Communist Party led the masses in a socialist revolution that liberated the country in 1949.

Since then the U.S. has tried every tactic, including military encirclement, nuclear threat, and diplomatic, economic and political isolation to bring China down. For over 20 years after the revolution, the government representing one fifth of humanity was not allowed to take its rightful seat in the United Nations. Now, after 13 years of negotiation, China has finally pressed its way towards entry into the so-called World Trade Organization.

Its goal is to escape the enforced discrimination in tariffs and trade imposed by the rulers of the WTO. It hopes to escape the tension-producing and humiliating debate each year on Most Favored Nation status in the U.S Congress, and to stabilize and expand its trade with the U.S. and other capitalist countries.

The overriding imperative for China is economic development. For this it must have access to technology, much of which it must acquire from the imperialists. This should be a basic right, not only of China but of all oppressed countries that have been plundered.

The AFL-CIO leadership says it will not support China's entry into the WTO because of prison labor. But listen to what the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions said about U.S. prison labor in a "Report for the WTO General Council Review of Trade Policies of the United States," delivered in Geneva on July 12 and 14, 1999.

The report says that "27,000 of the 1.2 million federal and state prisoners in the U.S. are engaged in work for pay, receiving between $0.23 and $1.15 a day. The prisoners work in several sectors including internationally traded products such as computer circuit-board assembly, clothing, automotive parts, food, telemarketing and telephone reservations systems for hotels and airlines (including Trans World Airlines, which makes extensive use of prison labor) and data-entry.

"There is evidence that at least three states are exporting prison-made goods, partly in order to evade laws restricting trade in prison-made goods between U.S. states. Prisoners who refuse such work lose their chance for early release, are deprived of privileges or sent to higher-security institutions and may be locked in their cells 23 hours a day."

And what of so-called prison slave labor and child labor in China?

In January 1998 the U.S. State Department submitted its "1997 Country Report on Economic and Trade Policy," to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. Section 9, entitled "Workers' Rights," says that China has "reform-through-labor facilities which contain inmates sentenced through judicial procedure" and also "a network of `reeducation through labor' camps."

"Chinese justice officials have stated that in reeducation-through-labor facilities there is a much heavier emphasis on education than on labor. Most reports conclude that work conditions in the penal system's light manufacturing facilities are similar to those in ordinary factories."

China, according to the U.S. State Department, "forbids the employment of workers under the age of 16 and specifies administrative review, fines and revocation of business licenses of those businesses that hire minors." While there is a problem with child labor in poorer, isolated rural areas, "China's urban child labor problem is relatively minor. No specific Chinese industry is identifiable as a significant violator of child labor regulations."

Child labor in the U.S.

As for child labor in the U.S., the ICFTU report to the WTO stated that 290,000 children in this country are known to be employed in factories, mines and particularly in agricultural work. This number is said to be underestimated because of the difficulty of monitoring migrant labor.

Regarding the right to organize a trade union in China, a delegation of the International Union of Food, Agricultural, Hotel, Restaurant, Tobacco and Allied Workers Union (IUF), which includes AFL-CIO affiliates, reported on Nov. 24, 1998, that the All-China Federation of Trade Unions "has a total membership of 103 million workers in 16 industrial unions."

The CIA and the State Department, working with the international department of the AFL-CIO, set up imperialist-oriented unions in Poland. This is the only kind of union the U.S. government is really interested in.

"Solidarity," which was financed by the U.S. and the Catholic Church, was instrumental in overthrowing socialism in Poland. Now the Polish working class is in worse condition than during the 1930s. Solidarity, having been abandoned by its bourgeois leaders, is now demonstrating against the new capitalist government that it was fooled into supporting.

China will not allow this type of "free union" organized by the imperialists.

With 103 million workers in unions, the organized proportion of the working class in China far exceeds the 13 percent in the U.S. In fact, the report to the WTO reviewing U.S. trade policies points out that the right to organize in the U.S. is far below the acceptable standards of the International Labor Organization. Some 7 million of the 14 million state and local government workers in the U.S. do not even have the right to collective bargaining, let alone the right to strike. Employers in the U.S. determined to break a union have the law on their side.

So if the AFL-CIO wants to bar any country from the WTO, it should start with the U.S.

In this rich country there are gross violations of workers' rights: prison labor, child labor, discrimination against women workers, restriction of the right of collective bargaining and the right to strike, use of migrant labor as indentured servitude and strike breaking.

The very idea of opposing China's entry on the grounds of workers rights' is preposterous, coming from a labor leadership in the heartland of U.S. imperialism.

Dangers of market economy

Of course, all partisans of the Chinese Revolution are deeply worried about the forced opening up of China to U.S. banks, insurance companies and telecommunications monopolies. These concessions, coming on top of the already growing unemployment and dislocation caused by the market economy, are bound to give a great stimulus to growing capitalist elements within China and erode the morale of the workers.

China wants development. Imperialism wants to return China to its former colonial status. The trade negotiations must be viewed as another phase in the struggle between imperialism and the PRC.

Hopefully, if the imperialists and their capitalist partisans in China get out of hand, they will meet the kind of anti-imperialist sentiment demonstrated in China after the bombing of the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade. The outraged demonstrations were undoubtedly promoted by sections of the party leadership.

The Chinese Communist Party still has state power in China. Despite all the dangerous concessions, this still stands as a barrier to counter-revolution. But, in the long run, this barrier is only as strong as the support of the working class and the peasants. Therein lies the danger of the market reforms.

Dracula to guard the blood bank?

Finally, it is the ultimate in deception to call upon the imperialists in the WTO to enforce "labor rights." That is like asking a vampire to guard the blood bank. The multinationals that run the WTO roam the globe looking precisely for cheap labor in any form they can get it.

If the AFL-CIO leaders want to bring workers' rights to the WTO, they should start by demanding that the world labor movement be brought into the deliberations as full participants, not as outside supplicants begging to be heard by one or another of the imperialist governments.

This is far more consistent with working-class interests than demanding that the WTO impose labor standards on the world. First of all, as a matter of the right of self-determination, the imperialists have no business imposing any standards--labor, tariff, monetary or any other kind--on oppressed countries.

Secondly, if the imperialists sign on to some labor standard, it will not be to raise the condition of workers in the Third World but to facilitate trade discrimination against the poor countries.

Third, the reason wages are low in Asia, Africa, Latin America and the Middle East is because the imperialist powers have forced underdevelopment on the peoples of these areas by denying them technology and using them to extract super-profits. It is in the ultimate interests of workers in the U.S., Europe and Japan to fight to forge solidarity in the struggle to do away with imperialism.

This is how to help raise the wages and living standards of all workers of the world and abolish this abominable competition that divides the working class, setting each against another to the benefit of the bosses.

The way to do this is not to fight a losing battle against "globalization" by campaigning to reform the WTO, but to fight to abolish the profit system upon which the WTO and all trade is based in the capitalist world.

It is time to fight for a new world system of trade, based upon the abolition of private property in the means of production, so economic life can be organized to satisfy human need.

It is time to free the world from tariffs, quotas, embargoes, sanctions and all the devices of capitalist commerce, and establish trade to serve those who create the wealth and make everything happen. This is all part of the fight to replace capitalism with socialism.

This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)

HOME :: U.S. NEWS :: WORLD NEWS :: EDITORIALS :: SUBSCRIBE :: DONATE