Workers.org

Support
anti-war,
anti-racist
news

:: Donate now ::


Email this articleEmail this article 

Print this pagePrintable page


Email the editor

 

VENEZUELA ELECTION

Political setback for IMF austerity

By Andy McInerney

Venezuela's working class was celebrating in the streets on Dec. 7. In the elections the day before, voters had decisively turned their backs on the traditional ruling parties and elected Hugo Chávez president.

Chávez is a former lieutenant colonel who spent two years in prison for leading a junior officers' coup against President Carlos Andrés Pérez in 1992. That coup backed widespread protests against the privatization and austerity measures Pérez had implemented on behalf of the International Monetary Fund.

Now Chávez is back--with a massive popular mandate. His election, and the defeat of the traditional bourgeois parties, marks a clear political setback for the IMF's neo-
liberal policies of privatization and cutbacks in social spending in Latin America.

The Chávez campaign quickly took shape as a class battle in the electoral arena. His Patriotic Pole coalition was based on the working class and nationalist elements of the Venezuelan bourgeoisie.

Four parties forming the Pole put Chávez on the ballot slot: his own Fifth Republic Movement, which received 41 percent of the vote; the Movement to Socialism with 8 percent; the Homeland for All Party with 2 percent; and the Communist Party with 1.2 percent. That gave Chávez about 57 percent of the total vote.

The traditional parties of the Venezuelan bourgeoisie--the social democratic Democratic Action (AD) and the Christian democratic Copei--did not run candidates of their own when it became clear they would be trounced. Instead, they backed Yale-educated Henrique Salas on their ballot slot.

Salas was the darling of the ruling class. But he received only 39 percent of the vote. Copei and AD together polled only 9 of that 39 percent.

The battle could be seen in the streets. "Down with the oligarchy!" was a frequent cry of Chávez supporters. Over 1 million people poured into the streets of the capital, Caracas, for his final campaign speech on Dec. 3.

Venezuela's rich showed their worry by sending their cash, jewelry, art and other valuables to secure bank accounts in Miami.

Early in his campaign, Chávez made a point of praising the "Cuban model." His opponents accused him of siphoning arms to the revolutionary movement in neighboring Colombia.

Cuban President Fidel Castro was among the first heads of state to congratulate Chávez. "Although they incessantly harassed you and slandered you for your heroic visit [in 1994] to Cuba, thinking that by doing so they could diminish forces and votes from your campaign, your smashing victory proves that the people have learned a lot," Castro wrote, according to the Dec. 7 El Universal.

Elections as a barometer

Chávez's electoral win does not in itself loosen the Venezuelan ruling class's grip on state power. But it does provide a significant barometer of the mood and degree of organization of the South American country's working class.

Venezuela has one of the richest economies in Latin America, because of its massive oil industry. This has made Venezuela one of Latin America's most proletarian countries. Seven of every eight workers are employed in the industrial or service sector.

But the oil riches have not reached the working class. Workers' living standards have dropped dramatically in the past 10 years because of the government's neoliberal economic policies.

Eighty percent of Venezuela's 24 million people live below the poverty level. Inflation has been running at 28 percent in 1998.

In 600,000 homes, families do not eat a whole meal every day. Conditions continue to deteriorate due to the current glut in the world oil market and the corresponding drop in oil prices.

The Chávez victory caps 10 years of mass protest against pro-IMF economic policies.

In 1989, government troops massacred over 1,000 people demonstrating against rising food prices. While the 1992 coup attempt failed, continued protests forced Pérez to resign.

More recently, in August 1997, unions staged a mass general strike against low wages and price hikes.

Can electoral success
mean social gains?

The question for the Venezuelan working class is: Can the electoral successes translate into concrete social gains?

Immediately after his victory, Chávez began to moderate his political message.

He described his goal as a government based on a union of "rich and poor, workers and the business sector, civilians and the military." He called his government "neither leftist nor rightist, but rather humanist."

"We don't want the communist model--it is not viable," he said on Dec. 4, two days before his election. "But it is just as certain that we don't want the savage neoliberal model either."

Whatever the president-elect's initial statements and steps, opposing class forces are in motion now in Venezuela.

Since the 1980s the imperialist bankers, acting through the U.S. State Department and the IMF, have imposed neoliberal economic policies on all the governments of Latin America.

With every other Latin American country squeezed in the IMF vise, resistance from Venezuela could prove to be an example for the continent's working classes and nationalistic bourgeoisies alike. It is likely the imperialist bankers and Washington will work actively to undermine any renegade state that refuses to accept the dictates of finance capital.

On the other side of the class barricades, millions of workers who voted for Chávez have concrete expectations. They are now beginning to feel their political power. The Dec. 6 election could become a factor in emboldening the mass struggle against privatization and austerity.

Chávez is calling for a constituent assembly after his Feb. 4 inauguration in order to rewrite the Venezuelan constitution. This is a direct challenge to the Venezuelan ruling oligarchy's legal monopoly over the governmental apparatus, including the management of the state-owned oil industry.

It will open a new arena for the working class to assert its rights, provided that working-class parties are able to operate independently with their own class demands.

This article is copyright under a Creative Commons License.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)

HOME :: U.S. NEWS :: WORLD NEWS :: EDITORIALS :: SUBSCRIBE :: DONATE