Phony leftists exposed
War of ideas breaks out over battle in Libya
Published Aug 31, 2011 1:14 PM
By directing their enormous joint military and economic power against a poorly
armed, nonindustrialized country of 6 million people, the imperialist states of
North America and Western Europe have imposed a criminal regime on the Libyan
Part of Libya’s continued resistance to this attempted imperialist
takeover of an African state is the ideological struggle within the left and
workers’ movement internationally. The only legitimate position for the
left in the imperialist countries is to support the Libyan resistance to
imperialism, whatever form it takes.
As Libyans continue to battle the takeover, the U.S.-NATO forces may still come
in on the ground. The new Transitional National Council regime, however, has
already been invited to represent Libya in imperialist-dominated international
bodies even as its armed gangs are massacring Libyans and the mostly
sub-Saharan guest workers remaining in the cities it dominates.
The TNC is not a real government at present, but a racist gang of hoodlums and
mercenaries looting homes and museums in Tripoli and other cities. This is
fitting, as its U.S. and European Union masters aim to loot all of Africa as
freely as they did until the 1960s.
Remember though that in Afghanistan in 2001 and in Iraq in 2003, the
imperialists won what appeared to be quick and easy military victories. But an
active resistance movement has stalemated the U.S.-NATO occupation of
Afghanistan. And the Iraqi puppet regime is still shaky enough that the U.S.
occupation will be extended. Reimposing colonialism in Libya may be no
Air war, propaganda war
The U.S.-NATO forces’ advantage can be easily explained. Libya’s
GNP was $96 billion in 2010, much of it in oil production. The combined GNP of
Western Europe and the United States was $29 trillion, or about 300 times
greater than Libya’s. Much of Libya’s wealth from oil sales was
deposited in imperialist banks, which simply confiscated it when their campaign
to destroy the Libyan state began.
This enormous wealth advantage yields military dominance. The Pentagon has half
the world’s firepower. Britain, France, Italy, Spain and Belgium have a
good piece of the rest. This hydra-headed giant faced Libya’s tiny
The imperialist propaganda machine yields another monopoly of words and images.
It demonized Moammar Gadhafi and his family. It disguised the TNC as a
“democratic” movement, when it was a small collection of
pro-imperialist Libyans, mercenaries, monarchists, reactionary religious forces
and opportunist defectors from the Libyan government, with a narrow popular
base only in the region around Benghazi.
The media exposed the decisive role of NATO forces only after the TNC entered
Tripoli. It probably did so because the imperialist military agencies then
wanted credit for what they proclaimed was a victory.
In the Sept. 1 Workers World, Abayomi Azikiwe cites the International Business
Tribune, the London Daily Telegraph and the Associated Press, all of which
point out the decisive role of Britain’s MI6 and special forces, U.S. and
French special forces, U.S. air intelligence and heavy bombing by NATO in the
battle for Tripoli. The truth is that without NATO leading the way, the TNC
forces would never have made it out of Benghazi.
The Qatar-based agency Al-Jazeera has also given the news from Libya an
anti-Gadhafi and pro-NATO slant throughout the last five months. Qatari troops
are part of the TNC armed force that entered Tripoli on Aug. 21.
There is another small contribution to imperialist war propaganda that deserves
discussion. Political analysts who have an undeserved reputation of being
progressive have brought the same arguments to a part of the left movement.
These analysts only carry weight because their “leftist” argument
coincides with what the imperialists need and want.
Following the Aug. 21 invasion of Tripoli, two such analysts were guests on the
Democracy Now! news show, which is popular among progressives.
One “expert” was Juan Cole, a history professor at the University
of Michigan. Cole argued that “Libya has reignited the flame of liberty
in the Arab world.” He claimed the TNC could enter Tripoli easily because
it had popular support. Cole ignored the role of NATO’s bombing, bribing
The other was Gilbert Achcar, a professor at the School of Oriental and African
Studies in London. He chided NATO for allegedly first trying to broker a deal
between the TNC and Gadhafi. He also presented the TNC as a legitimate popular
leadership. Since March, Achcar has promoted the misleading idea that Libyans
could “use” NATO to back a legitimate popular uprising without
being owned lock, stock and barrel by the imperialists.
Neither “expert” added that the NATO powers have waged this war for
oil profits and a military foothold in Africa.
These and similar “experts” around the U.S. and Europe — who
pretend to be progressive — are not acceptable as voices of the left and
must be countered by honest anti-imperialist forces, just as one answers any
Fortunately, there is an attempt to mobilize anti-imperialist ideas — and
action — in the United States. Former U.S. Rep. Cynthia McKinney has been
on a North American tour organized by the International Action Center, bringing
the truth about NATO’s war against Libya. Most of these rallies have
attracted between 200 and 500 people. Much support has come from the
African-American community, which knows of McKinney’s principled
anti-racist and anti-war stand when she represented the people of her Georgia
The tour is an example of how to build an anti-imperialist alliance that can
answer the phony “leftists” and give political support to the
resistance from within Africa.
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Support independent news DONATE