CIA told media to promote women’s horror stories in Afghanistan
Published Sep 9, 2010 11:04 PM
Recent WikiLeaks disclosures reveal just how low the U.S. government and its
media mouthpieces will stoop to revive support for its occupation of
A March 11 secret memorandum from the CIA’s Red Cell problem-solving
group, now made public, suggests “promoting women’s horror
stories” to bolster faltering support for the Afghan war, says John
Gorenfeld in the Aug. 16 New York Observer.
Gorenfeld continues, “Subtitling their memo ‘Why Counting On Apathy
Might Not Be Enough,’ the agents warned that sending more soldiers to
Afghanistan threatened to outrage the French and German publics.
‘Indifference might turn into active hostility,’ they wrote,
especially if soldiers and civilians die. The fix? Instead of using generals in
desert camo [camouflage] as the face of the NATO mission, use oppressed Afghan
“These victims could make ‘ideal messengers,’ the analysts
wrote, ‘in humanizing the ISAF [NATO International Security Assistance
Force] role in combating the Taliban because of women’s ability to speak
personally and credibly about their experiences under the Taliban, their
aspirations for the future, and their fears of a Taliban victory.’ The
report also urged that these stories be pitched to TV shows with large female
Surely the CIA knows that the reality is that under the U.S. occupation
“women’s rights have actually deteriorated as a direct consequence
of deliberate U.S. policy, including alliances with warlords hostile to
women’s rights,” according to Sonali Kolhatkar, co-director of the
Afghan Women’s Mission of the International Humanities Center
(Women’s eNews, July 26, 2009).
Taliban not the only culprits
Meanwhile, major U.S. media are enthusiastically following the CIA’s
guidelines. That the U.S. occupation hurts Afghan women didn’t matter to
Time magazine when it pictured on its Aug. 9 cover a woman whose nose had been
cut off by a relative living under the U.S. occupation. Time wrongly blamed the
mutilation on the Taliban, and implied that a Pentagon withdrawal from the
country would be “abandoning” Afghan women.
But The Nation, a progressive magazine, blew the whistle in an article
entitled, “Afghan Woman Have Already Been Abandoned” (Aug. 12). Ann
Jones, who recently returned from Afghanistan, said the woman on Time’s
cover, Bibi Aisha, told her that she had been mutilated by her father-in-law as
a punishment, and the Taliban had nothing to do with it. But to the CIA and, it
seems, to Time, what happens to Afghan women is irrelevant, as long as these
women’s sufferings can be exploited to provide backing for the war.
There is another sordid revelation concerning this Time cover story. Its
author, the magazine’s Afghanistan Bureau Chief Aryn Baker, did not
disclose that she personally profits from the U.S. occupation. John Gorenfeld
reports that Baker’s spouse, Tamim Samee, “is a board member of an
Afghan government minister’s $100 million project advocating foreign
investment in Afghanistan, and has run two companies ... that have solicited
and won development contracts with the assistance of the international
military, including private sector infrastructure projects favored by
U.S.-backed leader Hamid Karzai.” (New York Observer, Aug. 12)
Time responded to the Observer investigation by moving Baker to another,
undisclosed country, but continues to defend her specious article as a
“straightforward reported piece.”
With the generous help of the establishment media, the U.S. government would
have us believe that Afghan and Moslem culture is terrible and misogynist; and
that Afghan women need to be “saved” from their culture and from
men by a U.S. invasion. This is a false and racist bill of goods.
Afghan women can never find freedom under an occupying power. For women to have
their rights, the very first need is for the U.S. to leave Afghanistan and stop
interfering in its affairs.
Meanwhile, by relegating violence against women and forced sex with women and
children solely to Middle Eastern and Muslim cultures, the major media downplay
the situation of women here.
The National Organization for Women points out that there is “an epidemic
of gender based violence and sexual assault” right here in the U.S., and
the numbers, NOW says, are shocking. “In 2005, 1,181 women were murdered
by an intimate partner. That’s an average of three women every day. Of
all the women murdered in the U.S., about one-third were killed by an intimate
The National Center for Injury Prevention and Control says that women
experience about 4.8 million intimate-partner-related physical assaults and
rapes every year. The U.S. Department of Justice itself explains that a woman
is beaten every 15 seconds and a woman raped every two minutes. The National
Crime Victimization Survey of 2006 revealed that more than 600 women a day were
raped or sexually assaulted in the U.S.
If Washington is so concerned about violence against women in Afghanistan, why
isn’t it doing anything about violence against women in the U.S.? Why
don’t the media start a campaign exposing the maiming and killing of
women here by spouses and lovers?
The FBI also estimates that well over 100,000 children and young women are
sexually trafficked in the U.S. today. They range in age from 9 to 19, with the
average age being 11. This is sexual slavery of children — right here.
Where are the media exposés?
Western priests rape thousands of children
When it comes to pedophilia, Catholic priests have repeatedly raped thousands
of children in their charge for decades without punishment. In the U.S.
“only a fraction of the perpetrators have been jailed and little been
done to punish those who covered up the crimes.” (Agence France Press,
April 4) The U.S. government did nothing while victims, mostly working-class
boys, were intimidated into silence, and “abusive priests moved to
unsuspecting parishes where they found new prey.”
When researchers from the John Jay College of Criminal Justice were given
access to church files, they “found that more than 4,392 Catholic priests
and deacons sexually abused at least 10,677 American children between 1950 and
2002. Just 615 of those incidents had been reported to law enforcement and only
384 clergy members were criminally charged, resulting in 252 convictions. A
further 3,091 abusive clergy and 4,568 victims were identified from 2004
through 2009, according to a report published [in February].”
Are cops the U.S. Taliban?
The press has reported many stories of Afghan women under the subjection of men
with guns who kill and maim without being reported to police or government.
That doesn’t happen here — or does it?
Barbara Sheehan faces 15 years to life for killing her spouse, a retired police
officer, and will be tried in Queens, N.Y. For 20 years, her spouse, who
carried two guns at all times, beat her black and blue, threatened to push her
out of cars, humiliated her, pulled guns on her and taunted her. He told her
that if she left him, he would kill her family and their children. He dared her
to call the police. “I couldn’t call 911. He was 911,”
Sheehan said. The police “would never have arrested him. And then what
would happen when they left?” (Women’s eNews, July 13)
Women like Sheehan have no one to turn to and often nowhere to go. Many
women’s shelters refuse to take in the abused wives and families of
police for fear of retaliation by that cop and his buddies on the force.
“Domestic violence is two to four times more common in police families
than in the general population,” according to Purple Berets, a group
which advocates for victims of sexual assault. “In a nationwide survey of
123 police departments, 45 percent had no specific policy for dealing with
officer-involved domestic violence. — The most common discipline imposed
for a sustained allegation of domestic violence was counseling.”
This is the U.S. version of the Taliban, and it’s a national phenomenon.
The outcome can be very tragic. For example, Jeffery Grahn, a Clackamas County,
Ore., sheriff sergeant, had been reported three times to his superiors in the
police department for spousal abuse, including holding a loaded gun at his
spouse’s head, and also for being “suicidal.” But an
investigation by the police buried the matter, and allowed Grahn to keep his
badge and gun. On Feb. 12 Grahn killed his spouse Charlotte, two of her
friends, and then himself. (Women’s eNews, Aug. 4)
If Washington doesn’t stand up to this kind of violence against women
here, how could it possibly stop violence against women in Afghanistan?
Next: Washington’s agent of salvation for Afghan women is the
Pentagon. What is the Pentagon’s record on women?
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Support independent news DONATE