EDITORIAL
Racism, Rush Limbaugh and the NFL
Published Oct 28, 2009 4:45 PM
For anyone in U.S. capitalist society who does not see the connection between
racism and mass culture, consider the recent uproar involving the white,
ultra-rightist, extremely racist radio host Rush Limbaugh and his attempt to
invest in the National Football League’s St. Louis Rams.
In early October Limbaugh announced that he was in negotiations with Dave
Checketts, who heads up a Wall Street-dominated investment group that funds the
Rams, to become a part-owner. This is the same Limbaugh who in 2003 publicly
demonized Donovan McNabb, the African-American quarterback with the
Philadelphia Eagles, on ESPN. On a sports show, Limbaugh said that the media
wanted McNabb to succeed because he is Black. This statement caused such a
firestorm of controversy that ESPN was forced to terminate his contract.
This is the same Limbaugh who said that the enslavement of African peoples in
the U.S. “had its merits” and that the NFL resembles a “game
between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons.” The composition of
the NFL is at least 70 percent African American.
Once it was announced that the Rams were even considering making Limbaugh a
part-owner, a number of African-American players immediately denounced the
Rams’ owners’ move. The progressive sports writer, Dave Zirin,
wrote an Oct. 9 column for The Nation entitled “Why the NFL Must Flush
Rush.” In the article he quotes a number of these players. For instance,
New York Giants Mathias Kiwanuka said, “I don’t want anything to do
with a team that he has any part of. He can do whatever he wants; it is a free
country. But if it goes through, I can tell you where I am not going to
play.”
New York Jets Bart Scott remarked, “I can only imagine how his players
would feel ... . He could offer me whatever he wanted; I wouldn’t play
for him.” McNabb stated at a press conference about Limbaugh, “If
he’s rewarded to buy them, congratulations to him. But I won’t be
in St. Louis anytime soon.” (nbcsports.msnbc.com, Oct. 8)
On Oct. 14 Checketts issued a public statement saying that Limbaugh’s bid
had been turned down because “it has become clear that his involvement in
our group has become a complication and a distraction to our intentions;
endangering our bid to keep the team in St. Louis. As such, we have decided to
move forward without him and hope it will eventually lead us to a successful
conclusion.” (usatoday.com)
To make it perfectly clear, Checketts did not reject Limbaugh because of his
neo-fascistic views. On the contrary, most of the owners of the 32 NFL teams
are not only all-white but support the most ultra-right views and are members
of the Republican Party. In his article, Zirin states that most of these owners
are to the right of Dick Cheney. The NFL is run like a modern-day plantation,
with the Black players treated like well-paid indentured servants when it comes
to the lucrative multimillion-dollar profits they make for the owners.
The real reason why Checketts and his Goldman-Sachs backers rejected Limbaugh
had everything to do with the growing number of Black players who expressed
such strong negative feelings about Limbaugh that it could have potentially led
to a boycott of playing the Rams. And even though, unfortunately, no white NFL
players reportedly showed solidarity with the Black players against Limbaugh,
their outspoken protest was a positive step forward in the ongoing struggle
against racism and for players’ empowerment—especially with the
prospects of a lockout by these greedy owners when the next collective
bargaining talks begin before the start of the 2011 season.
Articles copyright 1995-2011 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
ww@workers.org
Subscribe
wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news
DONATE